On Wed, 8 May 2024 20:37:28 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the data below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>> name | builder | size | mode | count | score
>> -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
>> b01 | RANDOM | 600 | avg | 325677 | 6.764
>> b01 | RANDOM |
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:01:30 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the data below:
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>>
>>
>> name | builder | size | mode | count | score
>> -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
>> b01 | RANDOM | 600 | avg | 325677 | 6.862
>> b01
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 21:36:46 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>>> Hi Vamsi (@vamsi-parasa), few questions on your test environment:
>>>
>>> * what are the hardware specs of your server ?
>>> * bare-metal or virtual ?
>>> * are other services or big processes running ?
>>> * os tuning ? CPU HT:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:29:59 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Hello Vamsi (@vamsi-parasa),
>>
>> Could you please run benchmarking of 4 cases with **updated** test class
>> **ArraysSortNew2**?
>> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:54:03 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the data below. Each DPQS class was copied to java.util and the
>> JDK was recompiled.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:04:20 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> The new ArraysSortNew.Java has compilation issues:
>>
>>
>> error: DualPivotQuicksort is not public in java.util; cannot be accessed
>> from outside package
>>
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:31:36 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the data below. All tests were run after putting the DPQS code in
>> java.util package and recompiling the JDK for each case.
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 22:23:38 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the JMH data below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>> Benchmark (builder) (size) Mode Cnt Score Error
>> Units
>> ArraysSort.Int.a15RANDOM 600
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 22:23:38 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the JMH data below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>> Benchmark (builder) (size) Mode Cnt Score Error
>> Units
>> ArraysSort.Int.a15RANDOM 600
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:36:22 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>>
>> Please see the data below using the latest version of AVX512 sort that got
>> integrated into OpenJDK.
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>>
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:36:22 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>>
>> Please see the data below using the latest version of AVX512 sort that got
>> integrated into OpenJDK.
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>>
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:36:22 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>>
>> Please see the data below using the latest version of AVX512 sort that got
>> integrated into OpenJDK.
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>>
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:42:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Thank you Magnus!
>
> @vamsi-parasa You said:
>> Made sure that OpenJDK builds without errors using both GCC 7.5 and GCC 6.4.
>
> but now we have https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321688. Did you
> introduce any changes after
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:42:09 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Thank you Magnus!
>
> @vamsi-parasa You said:
>> Made sure that OpenJDK builds without errors using both GCC 7.5 and GCC 6.4.
>
> but now we have https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321688. Did you
> introduce any changes after
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 20:08:22 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the data below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>>
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 20:08:22 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski),
>>
>> Please see the data below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>>
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>>
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:12:41 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and doub
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:12:41 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and doub
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 22:37:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I pushed closed changes.
Thanks Vladimir!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16534#issuecomment-1847939767
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 22:37:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I pushed closed changes.
Thanks Vladimir!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16534#issuecomment-1847939767
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:06:14 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40;>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:31:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Testing have only one failure in closed tests and I need to fix it before
> this can be pushed.
Thanks Vladimir for the update. Is the test failure because of this PR?
-
PR Comment:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 00:31:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Testing have only one failure in closed tests and I need to fix it before
> this can be pushed.
Thanks Vladimir for the update. Is the test failure because of this PR?
-
PR Comment:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:06:14 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy wrote:
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40;>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:09:01 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>>> LGTM, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks Jatin!
>
>> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type
>> `bt`. Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please reve
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 23:09:01 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>>> LGTM, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks Jatin!
>
>> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type
>> `bt`. Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please reve
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:44:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Thanks Jatin!
> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type `bt`.
> Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please r
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:44:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
>> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Thanks Jatin!
> @vamsi-parasa, sorry, I was wrong. I missed that you need to check type `bt`.
> Latest change is more complicated than it was before. Please r
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:exc
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:41:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add missing header files
>
> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:41:26 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> add missing header files
>
> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:exc
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
> xm
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
> xm
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:42:39 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
> LGTM, thanks!
Thanks Jatin!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16534#issuecomment-1843372385
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:42:39 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
> LGTM, thanks!
Thanks Jatin!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16534#issuecomment-1843372385
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:19:23 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> remove unused avx2 64 bit sort functions; add assertions
>
> src/java.base
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:37:34 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:19:23 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> remove unused avx2 64 bit sort functions; add assertions
>
> src/java.base
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:37:34 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:59:19 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Hi Magnus (@magicus),
>>
>>> Are you saying that when compiling with GCC 6, it will just silently ignore
>>> `-std=c++17`? I'd have assumed that it printed a warning or error about an
>>> unknown or invalid option, if C++17 is not
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:59:19 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Hi Magnus (@magicus),
>>
>>> Are you saying that when compiling with GCC 6, it will just silently ignore
>>> `-std=c++17`? I'd have assumed that it printed a warning or error about an
>>> unknown or invalid option, if C++17 is not
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:33:48 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:33:48 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:19:00 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Hi Marcus (@magicus), please see the updated code which added guards to
>> check for GCC version >= 7.5 in
>> `src/java.base/linux/native/libsimdsort/{avx2-linux-qsort.cpp,
>> avx512-linux-qsort.cpp}`. GCC >= 7.5 is needed to
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:19:00 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Hi Marcus (@magicus), please see the updated code which added guards to
>> check for GCC version >= 7.5 in
>> `src/java.base/linux/native/libsimdsort/{avx2-linux-qsort.cpp,
>> avx512-linux-qsort.cpp}`. GCC >= 7.5 is needed to
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:15:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 22:15:24 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:48:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> But you are saying that you want to skip building this library unless you
>>> have a gcc version that supports c++17?
>>>
>> Yes, the request is to skip building the simdsort library if GCC version is
>> < 8 as only GCC >= 8
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:48:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> But you are saying that you want to skip building this library unless you
>>> have a gcc version that supports c++17?
>>>
>> Yes, the request is to skip building the simdsort library if GCC version is
>> < 8 as only GCC >= 8
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:07:19 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> But you are saying that you want to skip building this library unless you
> have a gcc version that supports c++17?
>
Yes, the request is to skip building the simdsort library if GCC version is < 8
as only GCC >= 8 supports C++17
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:07:19 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> But you are saying that you want to skip building this library unless you
> have a gcc version that supports c++17?
>
Yes, the request is to skip building the simdsort library if GCC version is < 8
as only GCC >= 8 supports C++17
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
>
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:38:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd to me too as the existing simd code seems to C code residing
>> in .cpp files for some reason.
>
> Yeah, that is also a good point. Why setting C++ flags in CFLAGS, and not
> just CXXFLAGS?
>
> Also @vamsi-parasa,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:38:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd to me too as the existing simd code seems to C code residing
>> in .cpp files for some reason.
>
> Yeah, that is also a good point. Why setting C++ flags in CFLAGS, and not
> just CXXFLAGS?
>
> Also @vamsi-parasa,
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
> xml
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
> xml
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:38:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd to me too as the existing simd code seems to C code residing
>> in .cpp files for some reason.
>
> Yeah, that is also a good point. Why setting C++ flags in CFLAGS, and not
> just CXXFLAGS?
>
> Also @vamsi-parasa,
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:38:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd to me too as the existing simd code seems to C code residing
>> in .cpp files for some reason.
>
> Yeah, that is also a good point. Why setting C++ flags in CFLAGS, and not
> just CXXFLAGS?
>
> Also @vamsi-parasa,
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:exce
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:exce
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:08:00 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 5391:
>>
>>> 5389: BasicType bt = elem_type->basic_type();
>>> 5390: // Disable the intrinsic for 64-bit types with AVX2
>>> 539
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:25:57 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 5448:
>>
>>> 5446: BasicType bt = elem_type->basic_type();
>>> 5447: // Disable the intrinsic for 64-bit types with AVX2
>>> 5448: if ((bt == T_LONG || bt == T_DOUBLE) && UseAVX == 2) {
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:25:57 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 5448:
>>
>>> 5446: BasicType bt = elem_type->basic_type();
>>> 5447: // Disable the intrinsic for 64-bit types with AVX2
>>> 5448: if ((bt == T_LONG || bt == T_DOUBLE) && UseAVX == 2) {
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:08:00 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 5391:
>>
>>> 5389: BasicType bt = elem_type->basic_type();
>>> 5390: // Disable the intrinsic for 64-bit types with AVX2
>>> 539
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:23:00 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull r
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
> xmlns=&
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:23:00 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull r
75 | 5.7
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 10 | 4299.519 | 862.63 | 5.0
> ArraysSort.floatSort | 100 | 50889.4 | 10972.19 | 4.6
>
>
>
>
>
> xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
> xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel"
> xmlns=&
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 23:44:25 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> Not listed here: https://oca.opensource.oracle.com/?ojr=contributors
>
> Yes, Vamsi is part of Intel Java team. He also has the author status
> (https://openjdk.org/census#sparasa).
> @sviswa7 I am asking about the copyright
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 23:44:25 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> Not listed here: https://oca.opensource.oracle.com/?ojr=contributors
>
> Yes, Vamsi is part of Intel Java team. He also has the author status
> (https://openjdk.org/census#sparasa).
> @sviswa7 I am asking about the copyright
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 17:26:52 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
>> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
>> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
>> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:04:55 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull r
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:04:55 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull r
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:14:18 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> Hello Vamsi (@vamsi-parasa),
>>
>> Thank you very much for benchmarking, I appreciate your efforts!
>>
>> I looked at non-parallel sorting when radix sort is switched off
>> (DualPivotQu
ysSort.longSort | 25 | 0.101 | 0.073 | 1.4
> ArraysSort.longSort | 50 | 0.227 | 0.219 | 1.0
> ArraysSort.longSort | 75 | 0.446 | 0.332 | 1.3
> ArraysSort.longSort | 100 | 0.714 | 0.557 | 1.3
> ArraysSort.longSort | 1000 ...
Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target ba
ysSort.longSort | 25 | 0.101 | 0.073 | 1.4
> ArraysSort.longSort | 50 | 0.227 | 0.219 | 1.0
> ArraysSort.longSort | 75 | 0.446 | 0.332 | 1.3
> ArraysSort.longSort | 100 | 0.714 | 0.557 | 1.3
> ArraysSort.longSort | 1000 ...
Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target ba
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:09:13 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Comparision of Stock JDK ( with AVX512sort) vs. Radix sort for All
>> (https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_RadixForAll.java)
>> > xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
>>
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 17:26:52 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
>> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
>> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
>> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:33:02 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>> Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>>
>> Will provide the performance data using AVX512 sort as baseline by early
>> next week.
>> (Friday is a holiday for us due to Veterans Day)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vamsi
>
> Hello Vamsi
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 17:26:52 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> * improved mixed insertion sort (makes whole sorting faster)
>> * introduced Radix which sort shows several times boost of performance and
>> has linear complexity instead of n*ln(n)
>> * improved merging sort for almost sorted data
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:12:36 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> Hello @PaulSandoz and @AlanBateman !
>>
>> Did you have time to look at the latest benchmarking?
>
> Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski)
>
> Will provide the performance data using AVX512 sort as
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:15:37 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
>>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:15:37 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
>>
The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking advantage
of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of magnitude speedup
for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
For serial sort on random data, this PR shows upto ~7.5x improvement for
The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking advantage
of AVX2 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of magnitude speedup
for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
For serial sort on random data, this PR shows upto ~7.5x improvement for
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:26:33 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
wrote:
>>> Hi Paul (@PaulSandoz), Alan (@AlanBateman), Any update? Do you agree with
>>> Radix sort in parallel case only?
>>
>> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous
>> comment was wondering if we need
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 03:21:52 GMT, himichael wrote:
>>> my question is that this feature should improve performance several times,
>>> but it doesn't look like there's much difference between open jdk 22.19 and
>>> jdk 8. is there a problem with my configuration ?
>>
>> Hello @himichael,
>>
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 03:21:52 GMT, himichael wrote:
>>> my question is that this feature should improve performance several times,
>>> but it doesn't look like there's much difference between open jdk 22.19 and
>>> jdk 8. is there a problem with my configuration ?
>>
>> Hello @himichael,
>>
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:31:14 GMT, himichael wrote:
> my question is that this feature should improve performance several times,
> but it doesn't look like there's much difference between open jdk 22.19 and
> jdk 8. is there a problem with my configuration ?
Hello @himichael,
Using your code
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:31:14 GMT, himichael wrote:
> my question is that this feature should improve performance several times,
> but it doesn't look like there's much difference between open jdk 22.19 and
> jdk 8. is there a problem with my configuration ?
Hello @himichael,
Using your code
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
