Hello all,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 06:32:04AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>
> >
> > I am sorry to say that I don't expect us to be caught up with 1.75
> > (which is 5 trips through bin-NEW, one of them bigger than usual cause
>
Package: apt
Version: 2.9.1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
Testing the new apt UI with freeplane showed a rather interesting bug. Apt will
now install a package without confirmation if all the deps are met.
I triggered this like so:
apt install
Hi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Jan Katins wrote:
> Subject: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1
> Package: cryptsetup
> Version: 2:2.7.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After a recent apt upgrade, my system failed to unlock. After a
> ctrl-alt-del, I
Hi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Jan Katins wrote:
> Subject: cryptsetup: Fails to unlock the filesystem with missing libgcc_s.so.1
> Package: cryptsetup
> Version: 2:2.7.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After a recent apt upgrade, my system failed to unlock. After a
> ctrl-alt-del, I
Package: libanyevent-i3-perl
Version: 0.17-3
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
See: https://github.com/i3/i3/issues/5986
The version of AnyEvent::I3 is 0.17 on CPAN while the git repo has version
0.18.
Could you grab the version from the
Hi,
> Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins {
> "o=Debian, a=stable";
> "o=Debian Backports, a=buster-backports"; };
The problem with the example is that it uses a=CODENAME-backports and not
a=stable-backports. The a= should be n= or codename= when using the CODENAME.
I've
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 07:24:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> So far it looks like no one has been able to figure out an obvious way
> for this to be exploitable, but I wanted to make sure that you were
> aware of this upstream issue:
>
> https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1609
>
>
Package: rustc
Version: 1.70.0+dfsg1-9
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to build a rust package from source when I noticed they use
traits. Async traits are supported as of 1.75. It would be beneficial to Debian
that
we can start developing
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:43:35AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-12-12 20:25, Perl wrote:
> >* What led up to the situation?
> >I noticed, since long time ago, that I was not anymore able to use
> >Apt-Pinning for installing packages from Stable and Testing Releases.
> >*
Hi,
> In the apt-cache(8) man page:
>
> http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/ gives a "Page Not Found"
> error.
>
> http://rw4.cs.uni-sb.de/users/sander/html/gsvcg1.html should be
> changed to
> https://www.rw.cdl.uni-saarland.de/people/sander/private/html/gsvcg1.html
I fixed these
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 115.9.0esr-2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I went digging for how firefox works on Debian because I want to make a partial
switch from Google Chrome to firefox. There are some things that could be
improved I think. Mainly by
Package: chromium
Version: 122.0.6261.128-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I've started up Chromium and want to sync my Google account.
* Create new profile
* Login to Google (succesfully)
Within Google.com you are known, myaccount.google.com shows
Package: kde-spectacle
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
someone on #debian on libera noticed a small typo in the man page. It is fixed
upstream:
https://github.com/KDE/spectacle/commit/992d197d34a0f04ac259e34b2e1e7a821eaff519
Cheers,
Wesley
-- System
Package: kde-spectacle
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
someone on #debian on libera noticed a small typo in the man page. It is fixed
upstream:
https://github.com/KDE/spectacle/commit/992d197d34a0f04ac259e34b2e1e7a821eaff519
Cheers,
Wesley
-- System
Hi all,
I'm looking at bug reports to try and clean some up and I noticed this one. I
think we can close it, see my reasoning below your message and if you don't
agree feel free to reopen the bug.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:14:24AM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> After upgrading from lenny to
Hi all,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:01:53AM +0800, Tianyu Chen wrote:
> In apt-get(8):
> The arguments are interpreted as binary and source package names. See the
> --only-source option if you want to change that.
> I think this bug should be closed now?
> Best regards,
> Tianyu Chen @ deepin
I
Control: reassign 1.21.22 debconf
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 04:07:11PM +, t3atwv+9rzw960a1ydj0@cs.email wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It doesn't matter which package you try to install, I'm using 'hello' as an
> example of a very simple package with no dependencies.
>
> If you try to run an
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:44:02AM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> > If "apt upgrade" is saying that it removes packages, that is a bug, yes.
>
> @david: it is not a bug, apparently.
>
> To put everything in a nutshell:
>
>- "apt upgrade" can remove packages
No. Without a
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:40:01AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:12:33PM -0400, Wesley Schwengle wrote:
> > I do not know what the bug here is, it could be one of these options:
> >
> > 1) apt-get/apt upgrade accepts packages to upgrade
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:32:24PM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> > I see. It looks like `apt upgrade ' behaves as `apt install
> > '. Which (to me) is unexpected behaviour, as the man page is
> quite
> >clear on its behaviour (man 8 apt-get):
>
> Well, clearly it shouldn’t. To begin with,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:48:53PM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> Hi Wesley, David,
>
> > You keep saying `apt upgrade' yet your command was `apt full-upgrade'.
>
> Yes, maybe it didn't express itself properly. After your suggestion about
> not using "apt full-upgrade" during this t64
Package: vokoscreen-ng
Version: 3.7.0-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
apt-cache depends vokoscreen-ng
[snip]
Recommends: pulseaudio
[snip]
Could you add an OR here with pipewire and/or pipewire-pulse?
Many thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian
Hi Miguel,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 05:09:47PM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> > I do not know, at times I'm also wondering why it doesn't do it, but I
> didn't
> > take time to look at the code to understand what the resolver is doing.
> Also,
> > it was sort of expected. I think we can
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:50:12AM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> >This problem isn't because of apt, the problem is that gdb-minimal/gdb
> > dependencies cannot be satified. A full-upgrade is the equivalent of a
> > dist-upgrade which will remove packages to resolve the
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Miguel Angel wrote:
> # apt full-upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Error!
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
>
ves me, but the last one
feels like it should be the best
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
___
Aptitude-devel mailing list
Aptitude-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
ves me, but the last one
feels like it should be the best
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley Schwengle
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:01:25 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Don't show update information
The application tells a user that an update is available. This is the
opposite of what we want in Debian. We want users to only update when
Debian ships a new .deb. Rem
Package: rofi
Version: 1.7.5-0.1+b1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I saw a cool thing on /r/unixporn on reddit and it made me look at rofi. I want
to replace it for the dmenu call to dmenu of suckless-tools. However there is
an issue.
rofi states that it
is a
configuration file showing example values for all possible options.
The file location is incorrect (on Debian sid), this should be
/usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index. It documents all the
options you can find.
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
Package: steam-installer
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I wanted to install the steam-installer package, this fails:
$ sudo apt-get install steam-installer/unstable
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state
Small update on the previous message.
It's the same as Debian #1055694, which is upstream bug
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62572
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
Small update on the previous message.
It's the same as Debian #1055694, which is upstream bug
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62572
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
Package: gerbera
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to see how gerbera does m3u playlist support so I installed it
from the repo and tried to access the web UI. What happens is that you only get
to see a login button. Once
Package: gerbera
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to see how gerbera does m3u playlist support so I installed it
from the repo and tried to access the web UI. What happens is that you only get
to see a login button. Once
a look
into your /var/log/apt/history.log to try to figure out what happened to
your linux-{image,headers}-* packages around the 11th, 18th and later on.
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
changed [not included]
-- no debconf information
>From 11cebcbcfbd245590a95e31af4375478e780c880 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley Schwengle
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 21:17:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in debian/minidlna.default: change systerm to system
Signed-off-by: Wesley Schwen
informing
users/sysadmin about this change.
I'm fine with adding a d/NEWS entry, that is mainly the reason why I
reported the bug. I think it's worth a mention because it confused me
quite a bit :)
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle
E: wes...@schwengle.net
Package: kitty
Version: 0.31.0-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: wes...@schwengle.net
Dear Maintainer,
On Debian stable version 0.26.5 of kitty is running, on testing/unstable this
is 0.31.0. In 0.28.0 a change in text rendering is made by upstream, this is
mentioned in the changelog.
Text
On 9/1/22 10:08, Tom Lane wrote:
Wesley Schwengle writes:
There is a view that we create and it uses a function and the view
definition changes between runs. I'm not sure why this is happening,
does someone know?
The core reason for the discrepancy is that the parser inserts
implicit
- yields as View definition
-- SELECT myfunc(hstore(ARRAY['bar'::text, 'baz'::text],
ARRAY[foo.bar::text, foo.baz::character varying::text])) AS sometext
-- FROM foo;
```
--
Wesley Schwengle, Developer
xxllnc Zaaksysteem, https://www.zaaksysteem.nl
Package: kitty
Version: 0.21.2-1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #1011079
Dear Maintainer,
The kitty release of 0.21.2 is from a year ago (release 2021-06-28) per
https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/changelog/
Could we get a bump to 0.25.2 released 2022-06-07?
Many thanks!
Wesley
Hello Vincent,
On 7/13/20 1:08 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 12 juillet 2020 16:14 -04, Wesley Schwengle:
In December 2019 version 1.7.0 was released and in April 2020 1.7.1 and
1.7.2 were released. It adds a very useful feature:
https://cookiecutter.readthedocs.io/en/1.7.2/advanced
On 2020-10-15 19:13, Wesley Schwengle wrote:
When booting with the linux-image-5.8.0-2-amd64 kernel I don't have
sound on my HDMI output. The pulseaudio config hasn't changed yet it
suddenly stopped working after a reboot.
When booting linux-image-5.8.0-1-amd64, the whole setup works again
On 2020-10-15 19:13, Wesley Schwengle wrote:
When booting with the linux-image-5.8.0-2-amd64 kernel I don't have
sound on my HDMI output. The pulseaudio config hasn't changed yet it
suddenly stopped working after a reboot.
When booting linux-image-5.8.0-1-amd64, the whole setup works again
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.8.7-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When booting with the linux-image-5.8.0-2-amd64 kernel I don't have
sound on my HDMI output. The pulseaudio config hasn't changed yet it
suddenly stopped working after a reboot.
When booting linux-image-5.8.0-1-amd64, the
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.8.7-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When booting with the linux-image-5.8.0-2-amd64 kernel I don't have
sound on my HDMI output. The pulseaudio config hasn't changed yet it
suddenly stopped working after a reboot.
When booting linux-image-5.8.0-1-amd64, the
Package: cookiecutter
Version: 1.6.0-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
In December 2019 version 1.7.0 was released and in April 2020 1.7.1 and
1.7.2 were released. It adds a very useful feature:
https://cookiecutter.readthedocs.io/en/1.7.2/advanced/directories.html
I would like to make use
Package: zsh
Version: 5.7.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
ZSH seems to segfault in the following scenario in larger git
repositories:
```
vi Zaaksysteem::Bar::voo::vooo::voo
# you'll receive the following message: Killed by signal in compadd after 0s
vi
# segfault
```
Package: zsh
Version: 5.7.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
Have a zshrc with the following setopts:
setopt hist_reduce_blanks
setopt hist_ignore_space
setopt interactivecomments
* Run zsh -f
* Now enter `
Package: poppler-utils
Version: 0.71.0-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
$ /usr/bin/pdfsig ~/Downloads/bar.pdf
Digital Signature Info of: /home/wesleys/Downloads/bar.pdf
Internal Error (0): Input couldn't be parsed as a CMS signature
zsh: segmentation fault /usr/bin/pdfsig
Hello Christian,
2018-09-03 6:00 GMT+02:00 Christian Couder :
> Hi Wesley,
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Wesley Schwengle wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've made some progress with the hook.d implementation. It isn't
>> finished, as it is my first C project I'm
:
* run_hook_le
* run_hook_ve
What do the postfixes le and ve mean?
Cheers,
Wesley
format-patch:
>From 129d8aff8257b22210beadc155cdbcae99b0fc4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley Schwengle
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 02:40:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] WIP: Add hook.d support in git
Add a gene
file or multiple files, the attack
stays the same?
I think I'm asking if this would be a show stopper for the feature.
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley Schwengle, Developer
Mintlab B.V., https://www.zaaksysteem.nl
E: wes...@mintlab.nl
T: +31 20 737 00 05
in. This allows us to provide post commit hooks
and allows the user to add additional hooks him/herself. We could
implement this in our own code base. But we were wondering if this
approach could be shared with the git community and if this behavior
is wanted in git itself.
Cheers,
Wesley
--
Wesley
Package: pass
Version: 1.6.5-7
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
I was reading
https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/password-store/2018-June/003308.html and
checked my installation and saw the security fix wasn't
Public bug reported:
KDE https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345973
The last comment is:
You must have libkf5notifications5 package version 5.10 or newer. If you have,
it might be another issue (although unlikely). If you don't, then please
update.
This bug is fixed in 5.10 of
Public bug reported:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324501
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04
Codename: trusty
$ apt-cache policy konsole
konsole:
Installed: 4:4.13.3-0ubuntu0.1
** Description changed:
- I have supplied a patch upstream: https://github.com/libwww-perl/lwp-
- protocol-https/pull/18
+ I have supplied a patch upstream:
+ https://github.com/libwww-perl/lwp-protocol-https/pull/18
liblwp-protocol-https-perl:
- Installed: 6.04-2ubuntu0.1
- Candidate:
Public bug reported:
I have supplied a patch upstream: https://github.com/libwww-perl/lwp-
protocol-https/pull/18
liblwp-protocol-https-perl:
Installed: 6.04-2ubuntu0.1
Candidate: 6.04-2ubuntu0.1
Version table:
6.06-2 0
100 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ utopic/main amd64
** Description changed:
I have supplied a patch upstream: https://github.com/libwww-perl/lwp-
protocol-https/pull/18
+
+ liblwp-protocol-https-perl:
+ Installed: 6.04-2ubuntu0.1
+ Candidate: 6.04-2ubuntu0.1
+ Version table:
+ 6.06-2 0
+ 100
** Description changed:
- I have supplied a patch upstream: https://github.com/libwww-perl/lwp-
- protocol-https/pull/18
+ I have supplied a patch upstream:
+ https://github.com/libwww-perl/lwp-protocol-https/pull/18
liblwp-protocol-https-perl:
- Installed: 6.04-2ubuntu0.1
- Candidate:
** Summary changed:
- Unable to send signed e-mails with Thunderbirg/Enigmail
+ Unable to send signed e-mails with Thunderbird/Enigmail
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269388
Title:
In case you want to patch it, this is the fix:
http://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/source/ci/919619a01db4653e81a633479dfe286f4b449b61/tree/package/enigmailCommon.jsm?diff=a9a66932a37b607f30a0de217f553f4f1823d8b2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
The original bugreport can be found here:
http://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/175/
This bug is to have enigmail patched and/or it's version bumped in
Ubuntu:
apt-cache policy enigmail
enigmail:
Installed: 2:1.5.2-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
Candidate: 2:1.5.2-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
I still have this issue on several boxes:
$ lsb_release -a ; apt-cache policy aptitude ; aptitude -s safe-upgrade ;
aptitude -s -y full-upgrade
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04
Codename: precise
aptitude:
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #663134
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663134
** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663134
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
fails to install
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: nvidia-current 195.36.15-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic 2.6.32.32+drm33.14
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Nov
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891375
Title:
package nvidia-current 195.36.15-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
nvidia-current kernel module failed to
Public bug reported:
fails to install
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: nvidia-current 195.36.15-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic 2.6.32.32+drm33.14
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Nov
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891375
Title:
package nvidia-current 195.36.15-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
nvidia-current kernel module failed to build
To manage
The bug was opened during the Lucid development cycle and got fixed
after another update during the development process. Because more files
where missing from various packages I closed the bug and marked it as
invalid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I can confirm the bug is fixed in Lucid. Aptitude now respects the
preferences file(s) in /etc/apt/preferences.d/.
@Rolf:
It is very easy to replicate.
Create a preferences file:
Package: totem-mozilla
Pin: version 2.30.0git20100413-0ubuntu1
Pin-Priority: 1001
Remove totem-mozilla package.
@Rolf, apt-cache is NOT aptitude. It is provided by the apt package not
by aptitude. So you see the correct pinning values with apt-cache
policy, but aptitude is not respecting it. Which is the bug :)
In other words, replace install the totem-mozilla package with :
aptitude -y -s totem-mozilla
@Julian, thanks for the commit to Debian sid. As I happen to run sid, if
you need it tested feel free to contact me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399474
Title:
RFE: include support
On Solaris:
# python -c import paramiko
/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40:
RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This application uses RandomPool, which is
BROKEN in older releases. See http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
Where can
** Changed in: update-manager-core (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Check for release upgrade only
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415026
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
/tmp is always a dir of /, you need to have a mount point to mount the
filesystem.
--
Temporary /tmp and /var/tmp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18661
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On 01.04.10 03:02 John Scoles wrote:
Hard to say exatly are you sure you are connecting to oracle corretly??
use DBI;
my $dsn = 'DBI:Oracle:host=localhost;port=1527;sid=XXX';
is a rather odd dsn
I always the the method above, although I don't define the host and port part,
since it is
I simulated the sync and got the packages from Debian sid directly,
build them on Karmic and had them tested by Marco Filetti. He confirmed
everything works as expected.
https://launchpad.net/~wesleys/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=karmic
After enabling my PPA he stated:
The version numbers
A friend of mine tested the package on Karmic and it works as expected.
He saved/loaded a game, tested a save game of mine. Which worked.
--
Backport simutrans from Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538897
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
Thanks for the prompt reply!
However, I spoke to the Debian maintainer of Simutrans, and he made a
sync request for simutrans, simutrans-pak64 on Lucid:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simutrans/+bug/538004
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simutrans-pak64/+bug/538005
Can we
I created a backport (https://bugs.launchpad.net/karmic-
backports/+bug/538897). So if you can test it, much appreciated!
--
unable to load any saved game
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454700
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hi all,
I've submitted a backport request for the simutrans package in Karmic.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538897
I think I followed the correct process, could someone have a look and
post back if you need something else?
I've requested to test the package from my PPA on the Ubuntu forums.
Public bug reported:
Rationale given here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg06365.html
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simutrans/+bug/454700
This backport solves a bug in the existing Karmic version.
It builds with pdebuild and I've uploaded it to my PPA,
Hi,
If I change the locale (LANG) to nl_NL.utf8 it works as intented.
However, when I set my LANG to en_US.utf8 and my LC_TIME to nl_NL.utf8 -
or anything else like en_GB.utf8) it will still use the LANG setting and
not respect the LC_TIME variable.
Cheers,
Wesley
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello, I've added a debdiff for lucid, it builds on both my box and my
PPA.
** Attachment added: Debdiff against lucid
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40440611/update-manager_0.132.2.debdiff
--
Check for release upgrade only
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415026
You received this bug
And a debdiff for karmic-proposed.
** Attachment added: Debdiff for karmic-proposed
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40443594/update-manager_karmic_0.126.9.1.debdiff
--
Check for release upgrade only
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415026
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hello,
I can confirm this bug with 2.14.5-7 (testing/unstable) and 2.14.5-5
(stable).
I did not have the problem with yiff-server 2.14.5-5.1.
While I'm typing this e-mail the problem got solved (after I
removed/purged yiff-server and reinstalled it).
Hope this helps..
/var/log/aptitude:
@martin
Thanks for the answer, much appreciated!
--
sun-java6 6b16 update for karmic, hardy and jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420426
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@martin
Thanks for the answer, much appreciated!
--
sun-java6 6b16 update for karmic, hardy and jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420426
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The removal of Sun's Java from Ubuntu saddens me. I don't understand the
reason behind it either. Is there more information regarding this
change? I follow both the MOTU and kubuntu-devel maillinglists and never
saw anything regarding this issue.
Does anyone know if there are plans to include the
The removal of Sun's Java from Ubuntu saddens me. I don't understand the
reason behind it either. Is there more information regarding this
change? I follow both the MOTU and kubuntu-devel maillinglists and never
saw anything regarding this issue.
Does anyone know if there are plans to include the
Michael Meskes wrote:
severity 567316 normal
thanks
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
You're kidding right? I just don't get the joke.
A calender which displays incorrect weeks is not usable, not to me at least.
I've noticed it also with the testing version,
Package: bsdmainutils
Version: 8.0.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello, I have the same bug as reported here. Since that bug is marked as fix
released I'm opening a new one. Feel free to merge them if needed.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556029
On
Package: bsdmainutils
Version: 8.0.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello, I have the same bug as reported here. Since that bug is marked as fix
released I'm opening a new one. Feel free to merge them if needed.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556029
On
Hi all,
I've enabled-proposed and tested the package, works for me :)
$ apt-cache policy gdesklets
gdesklets:
Installed: 0.36-5ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.36-5ubuntu1.1
Package pin: 0.36-5ubuntu1.1
Version table:
0.36-5ubuntu1.1 995
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com
Hi all,
I've enabled-proposed and tested the package, works for me :)
$ apt-cache policy gdesklets
gdesklets:
Installed: 0.36-5ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.36-5ubuntu1.1
Package pin: 0.36-5ubuntu1.1
Version table:
0.36-5ubuntu1.1 995
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com
gdesklets (0.36-5ubuntu1.1) jaunty-proposed; urgency=low
* python depends are not correct: 2.5 is now forced (LP: #350562)
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:07:09 +0100
Changed-By: Wesley Schwengle wes...@schwengle.net
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com
Signed-By: Ilya
Hello to all,
I'm currently busy with packaging and I'm running into a smallish
problem. For a PPA upload I need the *_source.{changes,dsc} files. But
my pdebuild didn't create these files.
According to the documentation[1] pdebuild doesn't create a source
package when using
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
