On 06/17/2016 06:27 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
> Just another opinion - but I too have been stuck on ASSP problems, posted
> questions, and never got answers. I've learned to live with the problems and
> just have to weigh the benefits of a broken ASSP installation vs no ASSp
> installation.
On 03/03/2016 12:41 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:44:43 AM Lee Howard wrote:
>
>> How many is "many"?
> It was discussed in the past on list by several, and some other put it on
> Wikipdia. How much do you need?
I'm merely po
On 03/03/2016 11:30 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thursday, March 03, 2016 08:43:44 AM you wrote:
>
>>
>> This last bit about "just about every other modern program and project"
>> is irrelevant and a red herring fallacy. Do you have some statistics on
>> every other modern program and
On 03/03/2016 09:37 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>
> Its not just mine, its a sentiment that has existed for years, shared by many.
I think debate and discussion are healthy but it needs to be done
without these types of hyperbole.
How many is "many"? Did you take a survey? Or are you
Forgive me for jumping into this mid-discussion, and admittedly I have
not read every word of this thread, but...
I have understood that there are two primary points that William is
promoting:
1) breaking-up the installation so that it becomes more-integrated with
the system - such as logs
On 01/23/2015 01:07 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Am I the only one having stability issues with ASSP?
I'm not having any problems, but I'm using an older version... ASSP
version 2.3.3(14029).
Anyone else seeing ASSP run away when rebuilding spamdb, and other odd errors?
I had occasional
Was there a problem with Sourceforge?
Thanks,
Lee.
On 06/11/2014 11:11 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Hi all,
as of 19.06.2014 all hosted applications on sourceforge are down
The ASSP project page was changed yesterday.
phpBB could now be found under 'Forum' - NOTICE that you must explicite
On 05/19/2014 12:49 PM, SM Hosting.sk wrote:
It is not easy to switch, for example the latest ASSP v2 wont start on
perl 5.10.1 on debian squeeze (the version before was working fine)
after the latest update and I must downgrade and latest ASSP v1 seems to
be buggy.
Wheezy servers are fine,
On 05/12/2014 08:35 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Hi all,
Fritz Borgstedt (15. April 1945 - 8. Mai 2014) is no longer with us. He
lost the battle with cancer.
I am so sorry. My condolences go out to his family and friends.
Fritz may no longer be with us, but his legacy lives on.
Indeed. I
Hello everyone.
I would like to accept all mail (no filtering) from authenticated
users. Is there a configuration setting for that?
Thanks,
Lee.
--
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion Make the Move to
or
IP-network to 'noHelo'. This will solve the blocking, but NOT the source
of the problem - the NON-SMTP talker.
If you use this quick dirty fix - the behavior of assp could be
unexpected.
Thomas
Von:Lee Howard fax...@howardsilvan.com
An: For Users of ASSP assp-user
I've modified WhitelistLocalOnly as well as strictSPFRe as suggested.
Thanks,
Lee.
On 02/14/2014 05:59 AM, Jeff Kabanuk wrote:
+1 for the spf resolution, I had to do this about 6 months back when everyone
was getting your IRS audit, BBB report etc emails all claiming they were from
I'm using ASSP version 2.3.3(14029). I have been getting spam from
fr...@aexp.com due to it being whitelisted (for some unknown reason),
and so I removed that address from the whitelist. However, subsequent
spam seems to have auto-whitelisted that address again. Can someone
explain to me
On 02/05/2014 11:57 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Is there any inherent problem in sharing the
databases between these two different versions?
This will not work for several tables, because both versions are storing
different records (content) for the same set.
V1 does not know 'mysqlSlaveMode'
On 01/16/2014 01:34 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Would someone kindly confirm that this dual-head ASSP server both
using
a shared database is a supported configuration?
Look into the GUI, section File Paths
So, I believe that I have
I've been using ASSP for years on multiple mail servers. I'm quite
happy with it, thanks.
I am about to attempt an installation that will have two different mail
servers sharing the same databases (via MySQL).
I've looked for confirmation, but I haven't specifically found a
statement that
16 matches
Mail list logo
