Besides World Tribunal, Guardian Writings refer to World Parliament too.
Dear Firouz,
This is the explanation which the House gives in its letter of April 27,
1995:
The Administrative Order is certainly the nucleus and pattern of the World
Order of Bahá'u'lláh, but it is in embryonic form, and
But I
don't think the House will legislate all the Ahkam-i-madaniyyih or a
detailed Qanun for various countries.
Dear Firuoz,
Well, we do have national and local Houses of Justice as well.
I m not sure why. Maybe Guardian never read this letter. Maybe this was a
personal opinion of Guardian
Dear Susan,
I am sure you have read the following, but let's once more have a look at
them:
For example, the question of Universal Peace, about which His Holiness
Bahá'u'lláh says that the Supreme Tribunal must be established: although
the League of Nations has been brought into existence,
Draer Susan Steve,
I would like to thankboth of you for
responding to me on this topic. I do appreciate your time. I willfurther
appreciate your feedback here. My purpose is to make things more clear in my own
mind.
Susan, you wrote:
"The reference to the House of Justice making civil
In a message dated 1/17/2005 2:51:43 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not think that "the wisdom of referring the
laws of society to the House of Justice" the laws of society means civil
laws,
Dear Firouz,
My translation of akham-i madaniyyih here isthe
In a message dated 1/18/2005 12:36:22 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of
course, in context, `Abdu'l-Baha is referring to legislative deductions.
Correct. But the issue of the proper relationship between religion and
state is a matter of law.
warmest, Susan
Dear Susan,
Thanks so much for your detailed email explaining
the relationship between state and religion in Baha'i Faith. Still I have a few
questions. I am away from home for a few days, I would like to read the
references you quoted and I will get back with my questions.
I do appreciate
Susan,
At the top of the document Jonah states "Note: the article "Church and State in the World Order of Baha'u'llah," by Sen McGlinn, also addresses these issues." Is this the document that the Universal House of Justice isrefuting?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that the word
In a message dated 1/14/2005 3:47:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the
top of the document Jonah states "Note: the article "Church and
State in the World Order of Baha'u'llah," by Sen McGlinn, also addresses
these issues." Is this the document that the
