with gcc-4.0 as well, so it
shouldn't be a system problem.
cu,
Thomas Chust
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
with the builtin
##sys#thread-block-for-i/o primitive. For an example how that can be
done and neatly wrapped into a custom input port, I suggest you read the
sourcecode of CHICKEN's tcp unit.
cu,
Thomas Chust
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
.
cu,
Thomas Chust
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
/sqlite3.egg, the
documentation, which is also included in the egg, at
http://www.chust.org/projects/sqlite3.html.
I have done some basic tests with the code but its most likely not
bug-free yet, so feel free to report any problems.
cu,
Thomas Chust
this is some kind of amplified rounding
error or a more serious problem.
Any idea or work around is appreciated.
cu,
Thomas Chust
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
(add1 i))) ((= i 100) n))
1
cu,
Thomas Chust
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken
Hello,
thank you for the patch. I don't even think it is too slow, as it is
still comparable in speed with dc, which is really fast.
With this problem removed, the numbers egg is really cool!
cu,
Thomas Chust
Alex Shinn wrote:
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:37:21 -0500, Alex Shinn wrote
Hello,
I fixed two type conversion problems in the sqlite3 egg. The new version
is available at the same place as the old one.
cu,
Thomas Chust
Thomas Chust wrote:
[...]
The egg is available at http://www.chust.org/projects/sqlite3.egg, the
documentation, which is also included in the egg
Am 06.09.2005, 15:56 Uhr, schrieb Michael Benfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it possible within Scheme code to get pointers to Scheme strings that
can be passed to C? I don't want to just pass it as a c-string; I need
[...]
Just pass the string as a scheme-object and manipulate it by hand then.
Am 16.09.2005, 01:36 Uhr, schrieb Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I'm also considering breaking the utf8 module into 3 modules:
utf8
utf8-srfi-13
utf8-srfi-14
which will speed compile and load times (it's a pretty huge module).
This is also because I plan to write a string-cursor
Hello,
I just found the following prototype in chicken.h:
C_fctexport void C_apply(C_word c, C_word closure, C_word k, C_word fn,
...) C_noret;
I wondered why on earth there was a closure parameter and a fn parameter.
Reading the sourcecode of runtime.c carefully reveiled that the closure
Am 19.09.2005, 15:31 Uhr, schrieb felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
The standard calling convention is:
argument-count, closure, continuation, arguments...
so, the closure is the actual closure object that contains the
code-pointer
and the free variables. Primitives have no free
Am 28.09.2005, 16:17 Uhr, schrieb Graham Fawcett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi folks,
I'd like to be able to fetch data from an HTTPS url. I don't see this
capability within the existing Chicken eggs. A libcurl binding for
chicken would probably be the most expedient route.
[...]
Hello,
on a
Am 28.09.2005, 17:48 Uhr, schrieb Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
on a sidenote, there is also the crypt egg for CHICKEN, which I wrote
ages ago. It is able to provide SSL support and should be usable
together with the http egg by providing custom ports generated with
crypt
Am 01.10.2005, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Brandon J. Van Every
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Does SCons have the ability to abstract away the compiler details? A
friend of mine said it didn't, that you had to specify all the flags
manually yourself.
[...]
Hello,
SCons doesn't require you to set
Am 03.10.2005, 15:47 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
1. Note that I had to name the exe chicken_d. I could easily rename it
in a
later step, but the point is that CMake doesn't seem to easily support
custom file names. Files will be named for the target plus the
Am 03.10.2005, 14:32 Uhr, schrieb Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Well, well. For those of who are interested,
here is my sample code, which is a quick hack and is dirty.
[...]
I would think more how to improve ajax.scm.
Basically, support of script-enabled(?) paremeters
and
Am 04.10.2005, 13:42 Uhr, schrieb Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I will have to duplicate a whole bunch of code from CHICKEN's tcp unit,
though. It's just a matter of copy and paste, but my question to Felix
is, whether it wouldn't perhaps make sense to export all the ##net
Am 04.10.2005, 20:46 Uhr, schrieb Peter Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
What if the messages that a message passing system used were themselves
continuations? Chicken already compiles to continuation passing style,
so what would it mean to package up the continuation and move it to
another
Am 05.10.2005, 02:36 Uhr, schrieb Brandon J. Van Every
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Chust wrote:
Am 03.10.2005, 15:47 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Brannan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
1. Note that I had to name the exe chicken_d. I could easily rename
it in a
later step, but the point
Am 05.10.2005, 03:41 Uhr, schrieb Peter Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:21:55PM -, Thomas Chust wrote:
CHICKEN does not have any feature that would make continuations
serializable; it would mean that you somehow have to transform machine
pointers to arbitrary memory
Hello,
a preliminary version of my OpenSSL SSL/TLS library bindings for chicken
is available at
http://www.chust.org/projects/openssl.egg
so far only the client side is implemented and verification of peer
certificates is useless, because you cannot load certificate chains, yet.
Am 05.10.2005, 14:21 Uhr, schrieb Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
a preliminary version of my OpenSSL SSL/TLS library bindings for chicken
is available at
http://www.chust.org/projects/openssl.egg
[...]
Documentation for the full interface as it will be (in a few days or so
Am 10.10.2005, 05:00 Uhr, schrieb felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Do you think it is also sensible to convert things like the tcp-server
egg
into SSL enabled versions?
Hm...I don't know - the tcp-server code is pretty simple - I guess it
would
be not too much work to roll
on
the
low level side. Everytime you acces the variable in example B, machine data
has to wrapped into or unwrapped from scheme data types -- with the int
type
in CHICKEN this should not cause noticeable performance losses, but with,
for
example, double variables it would.
cu,
Thomas Chust
Hello,
I think, the futures egg should conform to its own documentation and
export the future-complete?, -failed?, -condition procedures ;)
A patch for futures-base.scm is attached.
cu,
Thomas
futures.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Chicken-users
Am 05.11.2005, 18:06 Uhr, schrieb Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Should I scan all the sources to find (declare (uses extname)) and
then look
for the /usr/local/lib/chicken/extname.setup, extract all the filenames
from the file list and link against them all ?
[...]
Hello,
it would
Am 06.11.2005, 16:13 Uhr, schrieb Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How do I make an extension of two or more files ?
[...]
Hello,
the short answer is: It's possible, but why on earth would you want to
do that ;)
The long answer is that CHICKEN generates a C-function executing the
top-level
Hello,
yesterday I realized a really stupid mistake of mine in sqlite3:changes,
which I fixed. I also renamed sqlite3:call-with-temporary-statement to
sqlite3:call-with-temporary-statements and enabled it to create any
number of prepared statements (but the new function is still backwards
Am 11.11.2005, 03:34 Uhr, schrieb Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Attached is a corrected setup for the amb egg.
[...]
Argh! Thanks for the correction -- I am generating the .setup files
automatically and hadn't configured my Makefile correctly for an
extension with syntax :(
cu,
Thomas
Am 11.11.2005, 22:30 Uhr, schrieb Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was testing out the RPC egg and noticed it didn't work between a Mac
and a PC. This stems from endian issues in the s11n egg. Now, I
don't know if serialization was ever intended to work across
architectures, but I went ahead and
Am 12.11.2005, 14:48 Uhr, schrieb Sean Doran [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12 Nov, 2005, at 13:58, felix winkelmann wrote:
I'm not sure how to proceed, though.
One approach would be to translate the binary output into a tagged/
marked-up format like *gasp* XML...
[...]
Hello,
CHICKEN already
Am 16.11.2005, 09:18 Uhr, schrieb Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Does anyone know of any existence of a lazy-let macro,
which does the following?
convert from
(lazy-let ([a (get-a)][b (get-b)])
(if (condition) a b))
into
(if (condition) (get-a) (get-b))
[...]
Hello,
I haven't
Am 17.11.2005, 15:21 Uhr, schrieb Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...] READ throws
errors when it encounter the reader macros (those starting with #). I
am not
interested in them, I'd just like to ignore them and not get any error
[...]
Hello,
I think set-dispatch-read-syntax! is the
Am 19.11.2005, 01:18 Uhr, schrieb Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 17 November 2005 14:23, felix winkelmann wrote:
You will have to add reader-procedures (via set-read-synrax!
or set-dispatch-read-syntax!) for the missing macros yourself
and skip the contents.
After reading about it, it
Am 19.11.2005, 09:30 Uhr, schrieb Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I am parsing Chicken Scheme source code in the search for all the
includes.
Hello,
I dug up a piece of code to allow CHICKEN's read to parse CHICKEN source
containing the # ... # syntax. But I must admit that it isn't
Am 22.11.2005, 17:04 Uhr, schrieb Matthew David Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...] So I had to do sizeof(strlen(argstring) + 1) instead.
Hello,
what is that sizeof operator doing there? It should just be something like
malloc(strlen(argstring) + 1)
otherwise the value of the expression will
Am 23.11.2005, 12:40 Uhr, schrieb felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/23/05, Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, could someone perhaps explain me what exactly C_mutate does?
I played around with it a little and found that I have apparently
totally
misunderstood
Am 23.11.2005, 15:51 Uhr, schrieb Ralph Allan Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
I have been monitoring the list for a couple of months now. I am
curious about the type of projects or applications that everyone has
been creating using Chicken. I've seen some of the applications
listed at
Am 24.11.2005, 13:44 Uhr, schrieb felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
libffi should work fine on OS X, so I don't see a problem here.
It should, but it never did for me... After all the failed attempts, I have
developed a certain dislike for the libffi library ;)
objc_msgSendv() might
Am 25.11.2005, 06:49 Uhr, schrieb felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Well, objc_msgSendv is undocumented, and we have to
construct calls somehow, anyway. I don't know how easy it is to
build NSInvocation instances by hand, but it all looks like a hack as
well (just as with libffi),
Am 26.11.2005, 14:30 Uhr, schrieb felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/25/05, Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building NSInvocation instances is even easier than doing everything by
hand -- for example the parsing of ObjC parameter type encoding strings
is much less work, because
Am 26.11.2005, 23:52 Uhr, schrieb Matt Gushee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Is there a function that returns the current date/time? I've looked
carefully through the posix interface docs, and can't find it there; and
I see that Chicken doesn't support SRFI-19 (wouldn't that be a good
idea?). So,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, RalphMoritz wrote:
[...]
is there an Emacs mode available that will run csi as
an inferior Emacs process (preferably with syntax
highlighting)? Starting csi from eshell isn't so cool...
[...]
Hello,
standard Emacs distributions usually include support for starting an
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Sunnan wrote:
#;31 (define rec itrec)
#;32 ((rec zero? 1 * sub1) 6)
Error: during expansion of (letrec ...) - (letrec) unexpected object:
[...]
Hello,
I would say this is expected behaviour, because rec is bound in macro
transformer space -- see
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, SergeyKhorev wrote:
[...] So I was wondering how difficult would be a task replacing Chicken
runtime system? My idea is to keep current runtime interface but
substitute the body with calls to the host language other than just C.
Has anyone looked into this or even
Hello,
a small but (at least for me) nerve saving update to the sqlite3
interface: All procedures like sqlite3:exec, sqlite3:update, etc. now
reset prepared statements before working on them -- this saves you the
tedious task of having to do that by hand anyway, but it doesn't break
existing
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, LeviPearson wrote:
The readline library expects to be able to call a generator function
with a string and an index and get back a newly-allocated string that it
can use and then free(). To accommodate this, I wrote a C function that
calls a define-external'd scheme
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Dominique Boucher wrote:
[...]
How do I quote the parens and brackets above and use them later? Is
that even possible without renaming them to L-BRACKET, etc.?
Terminals can only be denoted by Scheme symbols. So yes, you'll have to
rename all special characters to
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, AshishShrestha wrote:
+ libtoolize --force --copy --automake
autogen.sh: line 3: libtoolize: command not found
[...]
This is the output of autogen.sh. Where do I get libtoolize?
[...]
On 1/29/06, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make w/ MacOS X is gmake, just use
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, DaishiKato wrote:
My suggestion is the following:
Check every commit automatically by a script,
and upload the egg only if the version number (maybe in the setup file)
is changed upwordly.
[...]
Hello,
generally I consider it a bad idea to change something without
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, AshishShrestha wrote:
[...]
The sqlite3 egg is hardcoded to rename the library .so instead of .dll
so it fails to install. Hope someone can fix it.
[...]
Hello,
I wonder why this is a problem on Windows. At least on Unices CHICKEN
seems to load every piece of compiled
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, felixwinkelmann wrote:
On 2/1/06, Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just removing the -o argument in the csc statement will break the
following install-extension statement, which relies on the output being
called .so
In fact, install-extension handles
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, KonLovett wrote:
On Mar 4, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Thomas Chust wrote:
[...]
Maybe a macro like this one should be added to CHICKEN:
(define-macro (with-locked-mutex-specific mtx proc)
(let ((mtx-var (gensym 'mtx)))
`(let ((,mtx-var mtx))
(dynamic-wind
Hello,
these days I needed a small SCGI server, which I packaged as an egg. The
interface is roughly similar to http-server.
The documentation and egg can be found at
http://www.chust.org/projects/scgi.html
http://www.chust.org/projects/scgi.egg
cu,
Thomas
Hello,
the SQLite3 bindings got a big update and now support user defined
collation sequences and SQL functions written in Scheme. They also do
automagical recompilation of stale statements now.
For technical reasons I had to break the valid NULL statement workaround
for these changes,
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Reed Sheridan wrote:
[...]
Why not just do something like:
(define (make-locking-hash-table)
(cons (make-mutex) (make-hash-table)))
(define (locking-hash-table-set! lht . args)
(dynamic-wind
(lambda () (mutex-lock! (car lht)))
(lambda () (apply hash-table-set!
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 14:51 + schrieb Thomas Chust:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote:
actually I must admit that I haven't used the SQLite3 egg for a real
multithreaded application so far. Nevertheless I have done
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, KonLovett wrote:
On Mar 4, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, KonLovett wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Thomas Chust wrote:
[...]
FWIW my reading of the source is 1) No 2) Yes. You could surround
access w/ disable/enable interrupts, since
Hello,
just a small question: Are CHICKEN's hash tables threadsafe by design or
do I have to surround all hash table accesses in multithreaded
applications by a mutex-lock! / mutex-unlock! pair?
cu,
Thomas
___
Chicken-users mailing list
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, ThomasChust wrote:
[...]
just to make sure: Am I right that CHICKEN's hash tables are thread safe or
can I mess up their internal data structure by concurrent access from
multiple SRFI-18 threads?
[...]
Sorry for reposting my question, but after more than two days
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, KonLovett wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Thomas Chust wrote:
Hello,
just a small question: Are CHICKEN's hash tables threadsafe by design or do
I have to surround all hash table accesses in multithreaded applications by
a mutex-lock! / mutex-unlock! pair?
FWIW my
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Sunnan wrote:
Just to make sure, to prevent duplication of effort: is there an easy
way to strip accents from unicode characters with Chicken?
Not that I know of. Proper case mapping is included in the utf8 egg, but
not this functionality.
Failing that, is there an
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Is anyone using darcs? Are you using any tools or just straight command
line? [...]
Hello,
I use darcs a lot for small projects. I like that darcs works without any
setup work just about everywhere and that it is very flexible in the way
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, DaishiKato wrote:
[...]
After reading the egg code, it can be simply done with
the attached patch. It will be committed to the svn,
once someone review it and say ok.
This works on my machine and looks fine as far as the use of the openssl
egg is concerned. I would like
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, DaishiKato wrote:
At Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:27:43 + (GMT),
Thomas Chust wrote:
This works on my machine and looks fine as far as the use of the openssl
egg is concerned. I would like to remark, though, that it may be useful if
one could somehow specify the second optional
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, marin kooka wrote:
[...] Is chicken-entry-points missing in chicken 2.3? I can't find a
mtching file anywhere. [...]
Hello,
the entry points API has been removed from CHICKEN some time ago, because
the same results can be achieved better by using procedures defined with
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The mailbox egg does not work on my 2.3 build: it deadlocks on
mailbox-wait! if the mailbox is empty. [...]
Hello,
I think this is not a bug, but rather a desired behaviour. When you
execute mailbox-receive! and the message queue is empty, the
Hello,
some days ago version 3.3.5 of SQLite3 has been released, with which the
sqlite3 egg version 1.5.3 works just fine. It is no longer necessary to
use the CVS version of SQLite3 with the 1.5.3 egg or the 3.3.4 version of
SQLite3 with the 1.2.0 egg.
cu,
Thomas
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, ThomasChust wrote:
[...]
A small example using TinyCLOS and SQLite3 is attached. It does runtime
generation of classes and accessor methods completely automatically from the
database schema and is terribly easy to use because I didn't have the time to
make up something
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, PeterBex wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:40:41PM +, Thomas Chust wrote:
[...]
A small example using TinyCLOS and SQLite3 is attached. It does runtime
generation of classes and accessor methods completely automatically from
the database schema and is terribly easy
Hello,
attached is a darcs patchfile that fixes a typo in csi.scm which turned
(macroexpand (string-symbol s)) into (macroexpand 8string-symbol s). The
error broke tracing of procedure calls.
cu,
Thomas
New patches:
[Fixed a spelling mistake that broke tracing in csi
Thomas Chust [EMAIL
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
[...]
While trying to figure out deployment models for binaries, I
came up with some hack for Linux:
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/coop?page=Deploying%20Linux%20binaries
[...]
Hello,
the basic idea behind this mechanism is fine, but the
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Reed Sheridan wrote:
[...] Also, the implementation of absolute-path? has a bug. It returns
#t for a pathname starting with windows-style drive letters, but in
Unix, A:/foo is a perfectly valid relative pathname. I'm not sure how
to conditionalize Chicken code for
Hello,
those of you always updating to the latest darcs version of CHICKEN may
have seen that the compiler has a very cool new feature to check for
possibly undefined symbols at compile time. It's one of those really
useful features that saves you from typos and that I always missed in
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Heath Johns wrote:
Hey there, nice scheme you've got here folks :)
I've got a noob question: Why does this segfault? Should I be doing
this differently? I'm using 2.3 stable on linux... [...]
Hello,
try using c-string* instead of c-string as the return type of nothing.
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Matthew David Parker wrote:
[...]
Normally I type:
$ chicken -dynamic xpai.ss
compiling `xpai.ss' ...
generating `xpai.c' ...
$ gcc -o xpai.so xpai.c path/to/c/lib/libxpilot_ai.so `chicken-config
-shared -cflags -libs`
Which makes xpai.so and I can load it in csi. But in
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Graham Fawcett wrote:
While speaking of buffers, is there an efficient, low-level way to set
a substring within an existing string? [...]
Hello,
you can probably hack something together in pure CHICKEN Scheme using
move-memory!, pointer-offset and direct access to the
On Wed, 24 May 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 5/23/06, Frédéric Peschanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Finally, I don't really understand which commands I should use
for compilation :
[...]
- of the library .o == .so
csc X.o Y.o -s -o libXY.so
[...]
Hello,
as I already pointed
On Wed, 24 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 24 May 2006 12:13:25 + (GMT), chust wrote:
as I already pointed out in my earlier reply to this thread (which is
apparently, like so often these days, delayed forever by the mailing list
software)
Not the software, it's us, the
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
What is the list length of (1 . 2) anyway? Only 1 makes sense.
Hmm, I think throwing an error, ÿÿjust like (length 'foo) doesÿÿ, would
make more sense than returning 1 for (length '(1 . 2)).
I vote for returning 1.5 ;-)
cu,
I'm reposting this, as it didn't make its way to the mailing list,
apparently. The original problem it refers to seems to have been solved
anyway, though...
--
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, jbarciela jbarciela wrote:
[...]
I want to play with scgi and chicken on my laptop (Mac G4, OSX 10.4.6)
and I'm
Hello,
it's probably important to know under which operating system this problem
occurs.
POSIX compliant systems allow the deletion of files while they are open
without causing trouble for the process that opened them. Win32 systems
don't regularly allow it -- and in the cases where they do,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 6/19/06, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
2) Remove the divide-by-zero trap in inexact division, and allow the IEEE
results to appear openly. This will mean that (/ 1.0 0.0) will evaluate
to Infinity.0, (/ -1.0 0.0) to -Infinity.0,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, John Cowan wrote:
Abdulaziz Ghuloum scripsit:
Out of curiosity, why not simply do f==1.0/0.0 || f==-1.0/0.0 to test
if f is +inf.0/-inf.0?
Umm. Too obvious, I guess. I started working these out in
Chicken, where dividing by zero throws an exception, so I
wanted some
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, John Cowan wrote:
Thomas Chust scripsit:
in my humble opinion it is a good idea to throw an exception by default
if a numerical operation does not make sense. This makes error detection
in algorithms much easier. If CHICKEN did not throw exceptions in cases
like division
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 6/28/06, jbarciela jbarciela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] I used scgi-example.scm as a starting point and just called
scgi:add-resource with my own functions. My question is: is there a way
to have a REPL in such an environment and modify the
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Graham Fawcett wrote:
[...] SCGI the protocol does not specify how the Web application process
runs. The original SCGI-server implementation was for Quixote, a Python
web framework, and runs as a forking-server (each request is handled by
a child process, managed in a
Sorry, I forgot to Cc the list on this message, so I forward it again:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Thomas Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 21.07.06 08:22:37
An: Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Chicken-users] synch egg renaming
Hello,
in my humble opinion the new names
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
[...] I wonder, why would anyone else want to understand the CMake
build? Unless they wanted to extend it, I can't think of a reason.
[...] CMake online documentation in general is poor. The mailing list
is great, you can get all your
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
[...] As I don't have a Mac, and I don't really know the quality of
CMake's MacOS X support, it wouldn't surprise me if there are troubles
here. Felix, don't you have a Mac? Not trying to add to your burdens,
but we do need someone around here
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
[...] Please delete ChangeLog from your build directory and your source
directory. If you pulled from Darcs, there shouldn't be any ChangeLog in
your source directory, but just make sure. Then go to your BUILD
directory using THE SAME SHELL
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
Built and ran fine (not installed, but in the local directory, but
the linker paths look allright).
This is version 2.430 (current darcs head).
Could you say whether `otool -L chicken-static` does or doesn't report
libchicken.dylib? I'm kind of
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Thomas Chust wrote:
[...] For this kind of issue, you'd need to write a trivial
CMakeLists.txt that reproduces the problem, then get on the CMake
mailing list and report the bug.
I'll do that if it actually annoys me and if I have too
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
[...] Seems pretty important if removing the bootstrap compiler toasts
the installation. [...]
Hello,
removing the bootstrap compiler only toasts the installed chicken-static
and csi-static, not chicken and csi. And so far I have *never* had
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
[...] But, we'll see if my INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES bulletproofing has any
effect on this problem. [...]
Hello,
I just pulled the latest changes using darcs and rebuilt
{chicken,csi}-static with CMake -- I still get dynamically linked
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Ashish Shrestha wrote:
[...] Don't know the reasons for it but I think, specially for those
using lighttpd, it would be more helpful to use script_name or
request_uri rather than path_info as path_info is always empty. [...]
Hello Ashish,
at the moment I don't have
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, felix winkelmann wrote:
[...] A release candidate for CHICKEN 2.5 is available now: [...] Please
give it a try. [...]
Hello,
seems to work fine for me. It even builds and runs flawlessly on Windows
using CMake and MinGW!
cu,
Thomas
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Ashish Shrestha wrote:
I am using scgi with lighttpd 1.4.11 and really enjoying it. [...] Don't
know the reasons for it but I think, specially for those using lighttpd,
it would be more helpful to use script_name or request_uri rather than
path_info as path_info is always
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Ashish Shrestha wrote:
Sorry for not updating. Yes, I did find that out while I was trying
out different combinations. You mentioned documentation. I didn't find
much in the scgi and fastcgi modules. Where is it documented?
Hello Ashish,
the lighttpd distribution tarball
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
