radek
On 2011-04-23 15:44, radek polak wrote:
Since:
linux-image-2.6.37-qtmoko-gta02_v34-1_armel.deb
is v34, should:
uImage.bin-2.6.37-qtmoko
be installed along with:
qi-v34.udfu
and:
qtmoko-debian-v34.ubi
? (I currently have the v35 stuff installed).
You can use it also with v35.
I tried it but then I can't get a USB connection to 192.168.0.202 . .
which I need for x11vnc etc . .
I'm finding that is problematical with the stable v35 kernel also; the only way
I can make the desktop recognize a usb0 is by rebooting it with the phone
already connected.
That is not
Here's an illuminating article about a (well known) alternative to an open
phone.
:)
http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news22-04-11.php#rotten
--
David Matthews
m...@dmatthews.org
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
dmatthews,
On 2011-04-23 17:12, dmatthews.org wrote:
I tried it but then I can't get a USB connection to 192.168.0.202 .
. which I need for x11vnc etc . .
I'm finding that is problematical with the stable v35 kernel also;
the only way I can make the desktop recognize a usb0 is by rebooting
El día Thursday, April 21, 2011 a las 10:10:37AM +, Niels Heyvaert escribió:
Hi all,
To those of you who didn't see summary flying by on Linuxtoday.com, there is
recent article published about the Openmoko:
Greetings,
I'm still using my FR as my daily and only cellphone (it still runs
Om2008.9) and I'm happy with it, [...].
I am glad to see someone saying that :-)
I am also using my freerunner (with QtMoko) as my only phone and I am
also very happy with it. Of course, I also find a few
On Friday 22 April 2011 09:56:07 Matthias Apitz wrote:
I'm still using my FR as my daily and only cellphone (it still runs
Om2008.9) and I'm happy with it, even if the battery is poor and lasts
only 6-8 hours. But I don't care because I nearly always have my laptop
or some external batteries
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and after 5
days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked. So it looks
like freerunner is maybe one of the best smarphones as for battery life,
Regards
Radek
WOW
When will it be available for us?
Radek,
On 2011-04-22 18:56, Radek Polak wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2011 09:56:07 Matthias Apitz wrote:
I'm still using my FR as my daily and only cellphone (it still runs
Om2008.9) and I'm happy with it, even if the battery is poor and lasts
only 6-8 hours. But I don't care because I nearly
Hi
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and after 5
days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked. So it looks
like freerunner is maybe one of the best smarphones as for battery life,
Just for the record, I find that remarkable. I'm running
On Friday 22 April 2011 11:04:29 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote:
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and
after 5 days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked.
So it looks like freerunner is maybe one of the best smarphones as for
battery
Radek,
On 2011-04-23 00:40, Radek Polak wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2011 11:04:29 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote:
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and
after 5 days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked.
So it looks like freerunner is maybe
Since:
linux-image-2.6.37-qtmoko-gta02_v34-1_armel.deb
is v34, should:
uImage.bin-2.6.37-qtmoko
be installed along with:
qi-v34.udfu
and:
qtmoko-debian-v34.ubi
? (I currently have the v35 stuff installed).
You can use it also with v35.
Regards
Radek
Hi all,
To those of you who didn't see summary flying by on Linuxtoday.com, there is
recent article published about the Openmoko:
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/mowi/article.php/3931296/What-Happened-to-Real-Open-Source-Phones.htm
I'm sure that after reading the article, you'll have the
Le 21/04/2011 12:10, Niels Heyvaert a écrit :
Hi all,
To those of you who didn't see summary flying by on Linuxtoday.com, there is
recent article published about the Openmoko:
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/mowi/article.php/3931296/What-Happened-to-Real-Open-Source-Phones.htm
I'm sure that
Hello!
After reading the article, I think it is just a waste of time. The
article does not even deserve to react on it. By commenting you just
give importance to it and that's what the post seek.
In my opinion it is just a confusing and lousy article with no relevant
information to make a bit
The article pretty well sums up my experience with the GTA02, although I
certainly have no regrets about buying one. All things considered, the
idea of the machine was great, but it is really unfortunate that the
performance, stability and general quality of the applications was
somewhat below
Balint,
I think it is just a waste of time.
Actually, I disagree.
What the article's author is saying is what a lot of people outside the
project have said, and with the GTA04 on the threshold of moving
forward, I think it is time to start putting down the naysayers again.
From my viewpoint
Unfortunately, I feel the struggle for a Linux phone is pretty much
submerged by the Android phenomenon, which is in my opinion, too bad.
Phone hardware that ran linux out of the box would be wonderful.
It depends on what you mean by Linux.
Personally I would like the GTA04 to run a Linux
19 matches
Mail list logo
