On 2022-11-21 20:46, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Please go ahead after filing the bug against malitt-keyboard.
Ok.
* maliit-keyboard bug: https://bugs.debian.org/1024593
* libpinyin 2.7.92-2 uploaded to unstable
Hi,
We have been performing the rebuilds and fixing packages for a while,
you can see the results of our last test rebuild (from the beginning of
this month) here:
https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby3.1
Some package listed as build failures were actually fixed already. From
the list
Hi Nilesh,
Le lun. 21 nov. 2022 à 18:29, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>
> Lastly I also want to higlight that: while bioc transition is in theory a
> transition (I agree)
> but to my understanding, there is no _real_ API change. It is just the tool
> taking the
> API field from DESCRIPTION file into
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 21:38:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024588: genomicsdb needs hinting into testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024588,
regarding genomicsdb needs hinting into testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:52:39AM +0100, Ansgar wrote:
Source: grub2
Version: 2.04-16
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ftpmas...@debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
grub2 currently uses grub-efi-signed-* as source package names for the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
binary-any + binary-all, but binary-any does not build on most
architectures.
This results in autopkgtest failure due to missing binaries on
the architectures without binaries where autopkgtest is anyway
run due to the binary-all.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1024540 [release.debian.org] transition: libpinyin
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1024540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-11-21 08:03:26 +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hello Release Team,
>
> libpinyin
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945
>
> On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1023535 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1023535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:27:46 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024027: transition: ros-class-loader
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024027,
regarding transition: ros-class-loader
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:27:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1023955: transition: rocksdb
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023955,
regarding transition: rocksdb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 11/20/22 20:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 11/19/22 20:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2022-11-11 11:55:45 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc:
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2022 19:43:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1022248: transition: icu
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022248,
regarding transition: icu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 2:00 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-10-30 14:08:55 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package 0ad and gnucash fail to build [1][2] with ICU 72.1 and bugs are
> > filed.
> > Package supercollider failed to build due to another issue [3]. Its
> > packaging Git has
On 2022-11-21 16:39:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > > Control: block -1 by
Hi Filippo
On 2022-11-21 09:58:08 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > > > > For the libs under my control, the transition is already prepared and
> > > > > these
> > > > > projects are going to be linking against the Qt6-built library,
> > > > > contrary to all
> > > > > the other packages
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian and others,
>
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:33:52PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > > packages from the transition. I actually injected two
Hi Adrian and others,
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:33:52PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
> > higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new
Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
308 armel
313 armhf
316 i386
613 mipsel
I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024567
On 11/21/22 17:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
higher levels manually to be able to build
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
> > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
> > higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new packages. So
>
On 11/21/22 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
As this
On 21 November 2022 at 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
| > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
| > > Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
| > > I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP
Hi Sebastian,
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > Control: block -1 by 1024567
> >
> > Some of the BioConductor packages need new
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1024563
> Control: block -1 by 1024565
> Control: block -1 by 1024567
>
> Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
> I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
> blocker.
As this is happening
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1024563
Bug #1023731 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-bioc-3.16
1023731 was not blocked by any bugs.
1023731 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1023731: 1024563
> block -1 by 1024565
Bug #1023731 [release.debian.org] transition:
Control: block -1 by 1024563
Control: block -1 by 1024565
Control: block -1 by 1024567
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Greetings, Sebastian,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 08:17:41PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Filippo
On 2022-11-11 10:56:08 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
Greetings Sebastian,
Thank your for your message.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:04:54PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1
Hi,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 308 armel
> 313 armhf
> 316 i386
> 613 mipsel
>
> I think it is fairly safe to say that the problem affects 32bit
> architectures.
Could this be https://bugs.debian.org/1023286 in fakeroot as well as
Niels pointed out in
31 matches
Mail list logo
