Hi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd
like an ack/review from a perl person, which I'm not.
I don't know enough about
Slobodan Aleksi?? wrote:
Sorry, I wrote on the wrong list!
Sorry, but yes. :)
The proper list for your question would be debian-user or - if the problem
has been located as a kernel problem - debian-kernel @lists.debian.org.
The debian-release mailing list is to be used for planning the
* Matthias Klose:
get the files from testing/unstable touch debian/control.in
debian/rules debian/control
I end up with this:
mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp \
cd /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp \
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:10:39 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.01.2011 20:46, Florian Weimer wrote:
Do you plane to switch to IcedTea 1.9 or a later version during the
squeeze release?
I will not do this myself, altough I would welcome this. Apparently
Debian does allow these kind of
Hi Florian,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a
separate package there anyway, I think). Is there an easy way to do
this?
I think there is some code in debian/rules:
ifneq (,$(filter
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for
sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not
apply to openjdk, as far as I know.
I think that openjdk is not that
* Torsten Werner:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for
sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not
apply to openjdk, as far as I know.
I think that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package chromium-browser
chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-5) unstable; urgency=high
* Backported security
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
I have ready NMUs for most of the affeted packages. I can upload them
soon.
My plans are to upload before the end of the upcoming week-end an NMU
for each of the affected package(s).
This
* Florian Weimer:
AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are
re-rebranded as IcedTea.
Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:55:15 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package util-linux
This is a translation
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:35:02 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Alternatively, we could first wait for -7 to enter testing, then fix
the PO files but, here, I doubt we'd have enough time if the release
is very close.
I don't really see the point of introducing more broken translations in
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Yes, and I find no free time for looking at this more deeply. :-(
Of course, an easy fix would be using my patch without thinking
further as the bug reporter said that this fixed the problem for
him.
This is what I finally did. I'm waiting
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package calendarserver
There is a bug I have detected with calendarserver 2.4.dfsg-2.1 currently in
squeeze. It has been filed here - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
ia32-libs-gtk:
Looks ok'ish. I'll do a final review once it hits the queue, though,
so please go
On Sun, January 16, 2011 14:41, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
ia32-libs-gtk:
Looks ok'ish. I'll do a final
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Florian Weimer:
AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are
re-rebranded as IcedTea.
Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK.
Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:42:31 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package chromium-browser
chromium-browser (6.0.472.63~r59945-5) unstable; urgency=high
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:43:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I said on IRC the debian/rules change was wrong, and for the rest I'd
like an
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:10:55 +0100, Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
Hello,
I am aware of the current deep-freeze of squeeze, but i want to propose
a bugfix-only-release of Docky which only includes cherry-picked patches
and translation updates!
NAK. It's too late for non-critical fixes.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:54:17 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package update-manager
What's with
+ * NOT RELEASED YET - changelog needs completion!
?
Cheers,
Julien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 16/01/2011 11:06, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:54:17 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:38:40 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:08:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:01:48 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
found 603986 1.4.0+12730-3.1
thanks
Argh
it breaks grass
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:23:06 +0100
with message-id 20110116152306.go2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#609622: unblock: update-manager/0.200.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #609622,
regarding unblock: update-manager/0.200.5
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:22:24 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
Hi,
pgdesigner 1.2.17-2 has just been uploaded to sid, and closes an RC bug
affecting squeeze.
I've managed to backport only the fix from the svn repository and make a
minimal patch
Care to explain the debian/rules and
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 20:25:05 -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-release
if update is needed)
This mhonarc release fixes multiple security problems. Please propagate it
everywhere.
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:28:17 +0100
with message-id 20110116152817.gs2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610056: unblock: bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610056,
regarding unblock: bind9/9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:29:32 +0100
with message-id 20110116152932.gt2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610059: unblock: clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610059,
regarding unblock: clamav/0.96.5+dfsg-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:30:35 +0100
with message-id 20110116153035.gu2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610076: unblock: nss/3.12.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #610076,
regarding unblock: nss/3.12.8-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:31:32 +0100
with message-id 20110116153132.gv2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610104: unblock: postgrey/1.32-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610104,
regarding unblock: postgrey/1.32-6.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:17:48 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Is there a proper way to edit already uploaded changelog?
Uploading a new version. So not necessary (and not really welcome right
now).
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:24 +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
my package ldap-account-manager has a rc bug (606794) and I would like
to ask you if this needs to be fixed in lenny or if I can just wait
until squeeze is out (where it is already fixed).
The bug in the lenny package version leads to a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 610146 + lenny confirmed
Bug #610146 [release.debian.org] pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
Added tag(s) confirmed and lenny.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610146:
tag 610146 + lenny confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I want to fix both issues described in #609923
The permissions of /etc/mumble-server.ini SHOULD be fixed in the next point
release, but I want to ask, if I should also add the patch for the not
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:01:05 +0100
with message-id 20110116160105.gy2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610075: unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610075,
regarding unblock: moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:00:11 +0100
with message-id 20110116160011.gx2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610115: unblock: update-inetd/4.38+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610115,
regarding unblock: update-inetd/4.38+nmu1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:01:49 +0100
with message-id 20110116160149.gz2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610142: unblock: nbd/2.9.16-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610142,
regarding unblock: nbd/2.9.16-7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:04:11 +0100
with message-id 20110116160411.ga2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610061: unblock: ddclient/3.8.0-11.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #610061,
regarding unblock: ddclient/3.8.0-11.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:05:01 +0100
with message-id 20110116160501.gb2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610065: unblock: halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #610065,
regarding unblock: halevt/0.1.6.2-1.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:05:35 +0100
with message-id 20110116160535.gc2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610096: unblock: ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #610096,
regarding unblock: ocsinventory-agent/1.1.1-2.3
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:06:14 +0100
with message-id 20110116160614.gd2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#610139: unblock: xmail/1.27-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610139,
regarding unblock: xmail/1.27-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hello,
There is a upstream patch for geda-gaf packaged that fixes an arbitrary
code execution issue:
http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=16b3d32fcf8458389a491aed9437be835131b4b9
here is the bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gaf/+bug/700194
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:09:41 +
with message-id 1295197781.23434.1115.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610108: unblock: setserial/2.17-45.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #610108,
regarding unblock: setserial/2.17-45.3
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:08:48 +
with message-id 1295197728.23434.1108.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610110: unblock: slbackup-php/0.3-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #610110,
regarding unblock: slbackup-php/0.3-2.2
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:07:54 +
with message-id 1295197674.23434.1101.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610113: unblock: typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610113,
regarding unblock: typo3-dummy/4.3.0-4.1
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:12:50 +
with message-id 1295197970.23434.1136.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610074: unblock: iog/1.03-3.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #610074,
regarding unblock: iog/1.03-3.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:11:57 +
with message-id 1295197917.23434.1129.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610094: unblock: nvidia-cg-toolkit/2.1.0017.deb1+nmu3
has caused the Debian Bug report #610094,
regarding unblock:
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:10:52 +
with message-id 1295197852.23434.1122.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610100: unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #610100,
regarding unblock: poker-network/1.7.7-3.2
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:13:48 +
with message-id 1295198028.23434.1143.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#610054: unblock: bandwidthd/2.0.1+cvs20090917-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #610054,
regarding unblock: bandwidthd/2.0.1+cvs20090917-4.1
to
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:27:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 12:18 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:10:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This change looked a little odd:
[...]
+ case TON_SCHRITT:
+- strcat(name,
Am 16.01.2011 16:57, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
tag 610146 + lenny confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I want to fix both issues described in #609923
The permissions of /etc/mumble-server.ini SHOULD be fixed in the next point
release, but I want to
On 01/16/2011 03:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Don't these things have CVE IDs?
Not yet.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 20:38 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Here's the new debdiff; thanks for your time!
Thanks for that.
Two small things:
+- strcat(strcpy(croom, ROOM: ), slevel_number);
[...]
++ snprintf(croom, sizeof(croom), ROOM: %s, slevel_number);
The new version has one fewer space
tag 610146 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 19:46 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 16.01.2011 16:57, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
tag 610146 + lenny confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 18:01 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
I want to fix both issues described in #609923
[...]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 610146 + pending
Bug #610146 [release.debian.org] pu: package mumble/1.1.4-4+lenny1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
610146:
Processing changes file: mydms_1.7.0-1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_5lenny9_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mumble_1.1.4-4+lenny2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:08:13 +0100, Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of the package hugs98.
The upload would fix this RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/608220
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hugs98/hugs98_98.200609.21-5.2.dsc
Hi Felix;
On 01/16/2011 04:25 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:22:24 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
Hi,
pgdesigner 1.2.17-2 has just been uploaded to sid, and closes an RC bug
affecting squeeze.
I've managed to backport only the fix from the svn repository and make a
minimal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
Am 16.01.2011 16:53, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Yes, this looks worth fixing in lenny. Please could you send a debdiff
of your proposed change?
I built a new version that includes the fix for 606794.
Please find the debdiff and 2.3.0-2
Hi Julien
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 04:02:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:43:51 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:00:20PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:19:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:08:13 +0100, Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of the package hugs98.
The upload would fix this RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/608220
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 21:57:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Ok, no other changes done apart from the dh_clean -k call in the
install target. I have uploaded it now with urgency high (directly
without delay queue).
Unblocked, thanks.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:25:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 20:38 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Here's the new debdiff; thanks for your time!
Thanks for that.
Two small things:
+- strcat(strcpy(croom, ROOM: ), slevel_number);
[...]
++ snprintf(croom,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:36 +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
Am 16.01.2011 16:53, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Yes, this looks worth fixing in lenny. Please could you send a debdiff
of your proposed change?
I built a new version that includes the fix for 606794.
Please find the debdiff and
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 21:51 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:28:09AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
I'll try to get a perl lenny upload (#606995) in stable NEW by Monday.
[...]
perl (5.10.0-19lenny3) stable; urgency=low
.
* [SECURITY] CVE-2010-2761 CVE-2010-4410
Hey,
Tor is releasing version 0.2.1.29, a release with lots of security
fixes, both minor and not so minor, including one for CVE-2011-0427
(heap overflow bug, potential remote code execution), a denial of
service involving compression bombs, and zeroing out of cryptographic
keys after use to
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:14:02PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sun, January 16, 2011 14:41, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:30:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sun, January 16, 2011 00:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Thijs
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:38:37 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 17:24:25 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
Dear jcristau and d-release all,
the current version of freevo in testing is 1.9.0-7 ; it is affected by
RC bugs
#607921 python-freevo: package fails to upgrade
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 23:40:43 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote:
I've upload a new version to Debian Mentors without the LDFLAGS change
and CCed the bug.
Well you've still not sent a patch to the bug, afaict.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 16.01.2011 22:12, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 16:19:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
Hi Felix;
Please discuss with the release team (in CC) whether your upload is OK
for squeeze. If they approve it I (or someone else) can sponsor the NMU.
Release team: diffstat is big
Dear release team,
regarding my mail from the Fri, 7 Jan 2011, may I ask if anybody could take a
look at it and tell me if the changes would be acceptable?
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:06 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
The following patch fixes many issues with the SE Linux policy that were
discovered after the release of Lenny. It also supports using the Squeeze
kernel which is really useful for virtual servers that have Lenny DomU and
Squeeze Dom0.
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net writes:
With the above changes, please feel free to upload (bearing in mind that
the deadline for inclusion in the next point release is tomorrow).
Thanks!
Well, since I'm not a full DD yet, and xdigger doesn't fall under my DM
rights, I hereby throw myself
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:09:19 +
with message-id 1295222960.23434.3295.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#609727: permission to upload sympa/6.0.1+dfsg-4 to
testing proposed updates
has caused the Debian Bug report #609727,
regarding permission to
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 00:48 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net writes:
With the above changes, please feel free to upload (bearing in mind that
the deadline for inclusion in the next point release is tomorrow).
Thanks!
Well, since I'm not a full DD yet, and
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:07:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
With that proviso, please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded!
M.
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3
xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc}
--
To
Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de (17/01/2011):
I didn't realize that you were talking about the patch itself.
Attaching it now.
Thanks, sponsored. Thanks for spotting I failed to get it fixed in the
first place, too.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing changes file: xdigger_1.0.10-13+lenny1_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.0.2-3+lenny12_arm.changes
ACCEPT
diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues?
No.
However, I do not have the ability to isolate (and especially validate)
just the security fixes. Additionally, it is conservative release that
should not break any existing
Hi Julien!
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:45:04 +0100, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
severity 609761 serious
Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work
Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical'
tags 609761 - squeeze
Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work
Removed tag(s)
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:49:34PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
reassign 609444 libevent-1.4-2
severity 609444 important
quit
Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de writes:
When the session is ended by closing the last shell within tmux,
tmux hangs.
Yes. This is a known bug in
81 matches
Mail list logo
