2013-11-12 18:02 Jeff Trawick napisał(a):
Are there any known issues?
Please fix remaining part of bug #55690 and backport full fix (r1535027,
r1535157, rXXX) to 1.5.x branch.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55690
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2013-11-12 18:02 Jeff Trawick napisał(a):
Are there any known issues?
Please fix remaining part of bug #55690 and backport full fix (r1535027,
r1535157, rXXX) to 1.5.x branch.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfrever@gmail.com wrote:
2013-11-12 18:02 Jeff Trawick napisał(a):
Are there any known issues?
Please fix remaining part of bug #55690 and
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested in
+1 from me.
On Oct 29, 2013, at 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:32 +0100
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather
than
Just to verify what I should be testing - and - is it too late to get
something added for packaging?
I assume that for httpd-2.4.X that should build with only apr-1.5.X
(preferred), or with apr-1.4.some-minimum + apr-util-1.5.X
What I would like to add is the buildaix scripts - similar to what I
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to verify what I should be testing - and - is it too late to get
something added for packaging?
I assume that for httpd-2.4.X that should build with only apr-1.5.X
(preferred), or with apr-1.4.some-minimum +
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:00:26 -0700
Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 10/28/2013 2:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:58:45 -0400
Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Mon, 28
On 10/29/2013 9:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:00:26 -0700
Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
On 10/28/2013 2:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:58:45 -0400
Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700
Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when
building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead?
You mean using the CMake and dropping the Traditional build
completely? -1
Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700
Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when
building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead?
You mean using the CMake and dropping the Traditional build
completely? -1
I currently do not see the problem with
On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather than
pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature detection and
headers buys us anything in compiling code which should 'just work' on
any compiler still in use in this
On 10/29/2013 10:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700
Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when
building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead?
You mean using the CMake and dropping the Traditional build
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:07:32 +0100
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather
than pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature
detection and headers buys us anything
On 10/29/2013 11:07 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather than
pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature detection and
headers buys us anything in compiling code which should
Just a note,
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net
mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote:
I'd like to first rid the 1.5 traditional Windows build of the
Release9x Debug9x targets. Anyone
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Just a note,
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:
g...@gknw.net wrote:
I'd like to first rid the
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Just a note,
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Just a note,
On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:58:45 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400
Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 10/17/2013 7:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net
mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote:
On 10/17/2013 7:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick
traw...@gmail.com mailto:traw...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
On 10/17/2013 7:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested in
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't forgotten :) I want to wrap up the apr_shm stuff on Windows
and
finish working through appropriate fixes that aren't in 1.5.x.
On 02 Oct 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also the apr_escape API from v2.0 which has not been backported yet.
That doesn't work on Windows; relies (or just uses?) some non-portable escape
sequence... I see the warnings roll by during compile and the
(whoops, meant to respond to both places; I hate this list setup)
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 02 Oct 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also the
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks Rainer,
The backport looks good!
Perhaps you could also consider applying my doc patch for apr_buckets.h in
bug 55115.
-
On 02.10.2013 16:19, Mike Rumph wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Since you are considering a release of APR 1.5.
This might be a good time to backport the APR documentation patch from
revision 1496407.
The second patch in bug 55133 will apply to the APR 1.5.x branch.
-
On 01.10.2013 14:26, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x:
* Compare 1.4.x-1.5.x and see if anything was missed. (I'm pretty
sure that there are some .h fixes that skipped 1.5.x; dunno what else.)
I did a comparison and reduced the delta. As far as I can
Thanks Rainer,
The backport looks good!
Perhaps you could also consider applying my doc patch for apr_buckets.h
in bug 55115.
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115
It is a small doc change, but corrects a misconception that could
mislead a module writer.
Take care,
I also did a by-dir diff, which is easier... in this way, you
can see the actual changes. Still not fully baked, but
this provides insight...
http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/apr-15-trunk/
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
* Check for anything whatsoever that could be merged from trunk and see
what to do, as presumably there won't be another opportunity for a while.
The
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Sure, no prob. Let me know if that
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Brian J. France br...@brianfrance.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this
On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Brian J. France br...@brianfrance.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj
On 01 Oct 2013, at 2:26 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x:
* Compare 1.4.x-1.5.x and see if anything was missed. (I'm pretty sure
that there are some .h fixes that skipped 1.5.x; dunno
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 01 Oct 2013, at 2:26 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x:
* Compare 1.4.x-1.5.x and see if anything was missed.
Hello Jeff,
Since you are considering a release of APR 1.5.
This might be a good time to backport the APR documentation patch from
revision 1496407.
The second patch in bug 55133 will apply to the APR 1.5.x branch.
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55133
This contains about
On 02 Oct 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also the apr_escape API from v2.0 which has not been backported yet.
That doesn't work on Windows; relies (or just uses?) some non-portable escape
sequence... I see the warnings roll by during compile and the
Subj sez it all.
I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
42 matches
Mail list logo
