+1 to delete personal branches
Also +1 to Matthias to disable push if the branch is nonexistent
> committers for various
> reasons, bugfix, tests.
That is interesting. Can anyone share the details here? I’d like to know the
bug/test which need to have a branch.
Chia-Ping
> Mickael Maison
An alternative would be to have a convention for personal branches. For
example "tmp/ijuma/blah". I don't have a strong opinion, but it seems
useful if people want to collaborate on a branch.
Ismael
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:02 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have accumulated a number
+1
Sounds like a good idea to me.
-Bill
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 2:55 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> +1
>
> Should be fine to just delete all of them (as long as nobody raised
> objections).
>
> Not sure if we could enable some protection GitHub side that disallow to
> push into non-existing
+1
Should be fine to just delete all of them (as long as nobody raised
objections).
Not sure if we could enable some protection GitHub side that disallow to
push into non-existing branches and thus avoids accidental branch creation?
-Matthias
On 3/13/24 11:39 AM, Josep Prat wrote:
Hi
Hi Michael,
I think it's a good idea. Only "official" branches should exist in the
upstream repo.
I guess the only exception would be if a massive feature would be done by
different individuals collaborating and they would need a "neutral" place
for the branch to be. But This didn't happen yet
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:02 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> What do you think?
I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if these branches (not trunk or
release branches) were created by mistake by the committer.
Thanks,
--
-José
Hi,
We have accumulated a number of personal branches in the github
repository: https://github.com/apache/kafka/branches/all
All these branches have been created by committers for various
reasons, bugfix, tests.
I wonder if we should avoid creating branches in the apache repository
(always use
