On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as
long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon,
simply because I don't think there is enough energy here to sustain
two parallel version of Struts.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:29:40 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
* The request may not have come from a form or a link; it may have
been submitted using an XMLHttpRequest object. In such cases, forms
as we talk about them are not relevant. Instead, we may want to
provide the request input in the form
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31514.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'd like to roll a release after you are finished with that. I really,
REALLY want to keep these rolling (about 1 every few weeks) which has the
added benefit of (hopefully) breaking this bad habit we seem to be in (~18
month GA release cycle).
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source
Works for me. I'm getting ready for a one-day trip on Thursday, but if it's not done
by this weekend, I'll do it as soon as I get back.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:37:39 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
I'd like to roll a release after you are finished with that. I
really, REALLY want to keep these
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter wrote:
One more thing: Could we finally start designing to Java interfaces
into Strutssup2/sup? Ta.
interface IActionRequest { ... }
interface IActionResponse { ... }
interface IActionForward { ... }
interface IActionContext {
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
+1
====
Ditto for Subversion. I was stunned by how many Subversion
questions there were. It's obvious that a lot of people can
use a compelling replacement for CVS, that is easy to
install and
Date: 2004-10-13T09:23:14
Editor: UlrichElsner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsDocView
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsDocView
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
While I don't disagree with any of Ted's points, I do think that we
need to expand our horizons with Struts Next, rather than just provide
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
Hubert Rabago wrote:
I also believe that Struts can release more often that every 18
months, but I don't know if a new release every few weeks will help.
In some cases, I think it might hurt Struts, because it can make
things pretty confusing for users. I can see it now on the user list:
Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases?
I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers
are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA. But,
what goes into a release? Does new features/enhancements go into a 1.2.x
Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases?
I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers
are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA. But,
what goes into a release? Does new features/enhancements go into a 1.2.x
Unfortunately, I had scheduling conflicts so I'm going to miss this one :-(.
Craig
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:20:56 -0700, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any Struts committers planning on attending ApacheCon? If so, how about
the Hackathon? I'll be there and am anxious to have lively
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:23:32 +0200, Anders Steinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases?
I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers
are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as
long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon,
simply because I don't think
17 matches
Mail list logo
