Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0

On 8/7/2012 12:49 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Jeff Trawick wrote: But if somebody else with a platform that is not Linux, AIX, Netware, or Windows wants to do some testing first, that would be appreciated. Maybe Solaris or FreeBSD, anyone? BTW, did anyone test on

Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.1

[ +1 ] Release apr-util 1.5.1 as GA I see no new issues, just the stuff I had mentioned on 1.5.0. The warning was not an issue, I should not have even mentioned it. Again, the win32 sources are missing .mak/.dep files. These have always been part of the windows source packages until quietly

Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient

On 9/20/2012 1:48 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi Michael, Am 20.09.2012 10:34, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 20.09.2012 08:53, schrieb Michael Felt: Yes, unfortunately? or fortunately! hehe, I would say fortunately since that makes it no regression and therefore your issue might not be something to

Re: missed aprutil.make file

On 3/29/2013 4:03 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Gregg, Stefan is preparing another 1.5 apu release. I think it would be useful to add the dep and mak files provided by you. Can you add them to svn Evidently no karma, or my working copy is broken. C:\svn\apr\apr-util\branches\1.5.xsvn ci svn:

Re: using new apr-util command-line make files... stuck on apr-iconv

On 3/30/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: To state the obvious, I'm probably doing something stupid. I am using Visual Studio 2010 + SP1 (to get around an incremental linking bug). I have a directory with: apr-1.4.x as apr apr-util-1.5.x as apr-util apr-iconv-1.1.x as apr-iconv Within

Re: using new apr-util command-line make files... stuck on apr-iconv

On 3/30/2013 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote: On 3/30/2013 11:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: To state the obvious, I'm probably doing something stupid. I am using Visual Studio 2010 + SP1

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.4.7

Sorry this previously got sent to you Jeff, Thunderbird does that with the APR list on reply. On 5/6/2013 7:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eric Covener

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On 10/17/2013 7:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote: On 10/17/2013 7:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:traw...@gmail.com

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

Just a note, On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote: I'd like to first rid the 1.5 traditional Windows build of the Release9x Debug9x targets. Anyone

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400 Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote: Just a note, On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 17

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On 10/29/2013 10:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700 Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote: Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead? You mean using the CMake and dropping the Traditional build

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

On 10/29/2013 11:07 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: On 29.10.2013 18:56, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather than pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature detection and headers buys us anything in compiling code which should

Re: Which of y'all are working on un-APR-izing gen_test_char, and how will the rest of us know if it is stalled and needs help?

On 11/5/2013 1:51 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 05 Nov 2013, at 11:04 PM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote: TIA! (ping) If nobody in the gen_test_char-with-traditional-Windows-build sub-thread knows what I'm talking about, please let me know. Maybe I am confused about the planned work.

Re: Link errors in apr_atomic with VS2013

On 11/7/2013 2:10 PM, Arsen Chaloyan wrote: On Thursday, November 7, 2013 4:27 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:49:22 -0800 (PST) Arsen Chaloyan

Re: Link errors in apr_atomic with VS2013

On 11/12/2013 10:33 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 11/12/2013 10:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:00:18 -0800 (PST) Arsen Chaloyanachalo...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyway, if it turns out the change has to be #ifdef-ed, which is most likely, then testing _MSC_VER only

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.0

On 11/13/2013 8:25 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5 autoconf version: 2.69 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2) libtool version: 2.4.2 (same as apr 1.4.8 and apr-util 1.5.2)

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.3

On 11/13/2013 8:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES files: http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-1.5 http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES-APR-UTIL-1.5

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.3

On 11/13/2013 1:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote: On 11/13/2013 8:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Shortcut to CHANGES files: http

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.3

On 11/13/2013 2:04 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 11/13/2013 1:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net mailto:g...@gknw.net wrote: On 11/13/2013 8:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Tarballs/zipfiles are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist

Re: CMake build doesn't define 'WINNT', but apr headers check for it anyway

G. On 12/5/2013 9:23 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 12/5/2013 6:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl mailto:b...@qqmail.nl wrote: Hi, On Windows apr_arch_misc.h checks for the ‘WINNT’ define, which was unconditionally defined on Windows before

Re: Building apr on win32

Ugg, this list and using reply in thunderbird. On 6/13/2014 9:24 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: Hello Christopher, Old instrucions for building in IDE really. If you want to build in the IDE just open apr-util.dsw and allow VC to convert. If you want to build at the command line; On 6/13/2014 8:49

Re: Building apr on win32

On 6/13/2014 9:36 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Greg, On 6/13/14, 12:24 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Old instrucions for building in IDE really. If you want to build in the IDE just open apr-util.dsw and allow VC to convert. If you want to build at the command line; Yeah, I'd like something

Re: Building apr on win32

On 6/13/2014 10:16 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Greg, On 6/13/14, 12:57 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 6/13/2014 9:36 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Greg, On 6/13/14, 12:24 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Old instrucions for building in IDE really. If you want to build in the IDE just open apr-util.dsw

Re: Building apr on win32

On 6/13/2014 10:16 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Yeah, I'd like something that I can script. Right now, there's basically one guy who knows how to build tcnative on win32. We're trying to change that ;) I'm going to blindly assume scripting using a batch file which something I forgot to

Re: Building apr on win32

Christopher, On 6/18/2014 9:52 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: All, On 6/18/14, 12:44 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Greg, On 6/18/14, 12:11 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: nmake /f makefile.win ARCH=Win32 Release CRYPTO_LIST=openssl buildall checkall If I don't need to build libapr

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-util 1.5.4

On 9/16/2014 4:47 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: [+1] Release apr-util 1.5.4 as GA Built: VC6 in tree with httpd-2.2.29 VC9 on it's own Tested: VC9, no regressions noticed in dll tests.

Re: building apr on windows server 2008 R2

Hi Greg, The linker is not finding libapr-1.lib it looks from the errors. Studio 2010 was the most problematic for me personally when it came to converting the vc6 project files. We all love the IDE, but 2010 2012 seemed to be extra quirky on conversions. My suggestion here is to actually

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 4/23/2015 5:36 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/22/2015 06:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+? PR 57191. As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something

Re: Any concerns with a TR of apr 1.5.2 on Saturday a.m.?

On 4/22/2015 3:19 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: (subject says it all) Did we ever decide the best way to handle apr_atomic.c on VC 2013+? PR 57191. As often as APR is released, it would be nice to get something done this time around, even if it's not the perfect solution. It has to better than

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 4/28/2015 1:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/28/2015 04:28 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but [ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA After 73 hours we have two

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 4/28/2015 7:34 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/25/2015 09:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Looks like you have enough binding votes now anyway but [ +1 ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA After 73 hours we have two binding non-zero votes (fortunately in the same direction). Gregg indicated that he may

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build apr tests libdll pass httpd-2.4.12 build regression Win Vista, VS 2008 x86, zip, retro build apr tests libdll pass httpd-2.4.12 build regression apr-1.lib(rand.obj) : error

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.5.2

On 4/27/2015 4:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/27/2015 08:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/27/2015 08:15 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 04/26/2015 11:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 4/25/2015 6:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: +/-1 [ ] Release APR 1.5.2 as GA Win 8.1, VS 2013 x86, zip, retro build

Re: minor APR 1.5.2 build error on Windows

On 6/22/2015 2:49 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: Hi, I just tested building APR 1.5.2 from source on windows, following the instructions from the readme file. compiling (aka: nmake -f Makefile.win) succeeded without problems, but the following install command (aka: nmake -f Makefile.win PREFIX=FOO

Re: minor APR 1.5.2 build error on Windows

On 6/25/2015 10:51 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: Hi Gregg, On 6/22/2015 3:58 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: Hi Gregg, On 6/22/2015 2:49 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: Hi, I just tested building APR 1.5.2 from source on windows, following the instructions from the readme file. compiling (aka: nmake -f

Re: minor APR 1.5.2 build error on Windows

On 6/22/2015 3:58 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: Hi Gregg, On 6/22/2015 2:49 AM, Stefan Hett wrote: Hi, I just tested building APR 1.5.2 from source on windows, following the instructions from the readme file. compiling (aka: nmake -f Makefile.win) succeeded without problems, but the following

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On 8/27/2015 1:45 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 8/26/2015 9:56 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Aug 26, 2015 11:41 PM, Branko Čibejbr...@apache.org wrote: On 27.08.2015 06:37, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Several years ago, we combined the functionality

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

On 8/26/2015 9:56 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Aug 26, 2015 11:41 PM, Branko Čibejbr...@apache.org wrote: On 27.08.2015 06:37, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Several years ago, we combined the functionality of apr and apr-util, and that library no

Re: Time for APR 2.0?

Sorry Bill. For the rest, here it is where it should have been sent in the first place. On 8/27/2015 7:54 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Aug 27, 2015 3:47 AM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote: On 8/26/2015 9:56 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Aug 26, 2015 11:41 PM, Branko

Re: Mailing list semantics

On 1/27/2016 8:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics Please!

RE: svn commit: r1773931 - in /apr/apr-util/branches/1.6.x: ./ crypto/ crypto/crypt_blowfish.c

Hi Yann, Author: ylavic Date: Tue Dec 13 08:39:51 2016 New Revision: 1773931 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1773931=rev Log: Merge r1773929 from trunk, follow up to r1772979. apr_crypto: blowfish: follow up to r1772803: also cap hash verification time. Modified:

Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

As for I, the only problematic VC IDE is 10 because it simply refuses to recognize /implib which is a baked in bug. Instead it names the import library the same as the project so all consumers trying to link to apr-1/libapr-1.lib cannot. The majority of squeaking over the years seems to be

Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

Please ignore my comments about this. thx On 11/30/2016 10:27 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 11/30/2016 10:05 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: revert As for cmakelist.txt, I doubt this is going to work any longer, at least at those paths; SET(EXPAT_SOURCES xml/expat/lib/xmlrole.c xml/expat/lib

Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

On 12/3/2016 4:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: Right off the bat, with 1.6, we should enable IPv6 out of the box. I couldn't agree more on this. I was going to mention it but evidently I spaced it.

Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

On 12/3/2016 4:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: As for I, the only problematic VC IDE is 10 because it simply refuses to recognize /implib which is a baked in bug. Instead it names the import library the same as the proj

Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

On 11/30/2016 10:05 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: revert As for cmakelist.txt, I doubt this is going to work any longer, at least at those paths; SET(EXPAT_SOURCES xml/expat/lib/xmlrole.c xml/expat/lib/xmltok.c xml/expat/lib/xmlparse.c )

Re: 1.6 apr/apr-util scope/timetable?

On 11/30/2016 9:23 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Even as httpd is operating under paralysis by analysis, we are long past a year since the last releases. Is there anything holding up the jumps to 1.6, or 2.0? I'd personally like to see an API harmonising memcache to redis, but that can't

Re: 1.6 release timetable

On 3/22/2017 8:30 AM, Nick Kew wrote: [sorry, reposting by cut from this morning when mail was broken] On Sun, 2017-03-19 at 20:44 -0700, Gregg Smith wrote: On Sun, 2017-03-19 at 20:44 -0700, Gregg Smith wrote: > I've been hacking on the .mak and .win files. > Had

Re: 1.6 release timetable

On 3/22/2017 8:30 AM, Nick Kew wrote: Gregg, any thoughts on a timeframe for commit? Obviously nice-to-have, though I'm also thinking if we have to release without a fix, we can at least use Jan's latest post in a release note. -- Nick Kew My retro

Re: 1.6 release timetable

Arg, this list bites me again. Sorry for the double Jan. On 3/19/2017 11:44 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Nick Kew in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:57:37 +): On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 08:28 +0100, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Will this 1.6 release contain support of OpenSSL 1.1.x or is

Re: svn commit: r1790911 - in /apr/apr-util/branches/1.6.x: aprutil.dep aprutil.mak libaprutil.mak

On 4/11/2017 3:11 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:46 PM, wrote: Author: gsmith Date: Tue Apr 11 03:46:02 2017 New Revision: 1790911 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790911=rev Log: remove dbd_freetds from .mak/dep I don't use it, but know it

Re: svn commit: r1790911 - in /apr/apr-util/branches/1.6.x: aprutil.dep aprutil.mak libaprutil.mak

On 4/12/2017 2:01 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 19:15 -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: remove dbd_freetds from .mak/dep I don't use it, but know it compiled at one time. What's the backstory to this depreciation? http://svn.apache.org/r1789903 Thanks! See also

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 5/31/2017 8:51 AM, Nick Kew wrote: I've uploaded release candidates APR-1.6.1 alongside the existing APR-UTIL-1.6.0. These bring the benefit of a number of updates to our users. Please test and VOTE on releasing these as our best available versions. [-1] Release apr-1.6.1 [+1 / 0 / -1]

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-1.6.1 and APR-UTIL 1.6.0

owe-clan.net> wrote: Investigating which commit may have been missed... Update within the hour. On May 31, 2017 1:44 PM, "Gregg Smith" <g...@gknw.net> wrote: Something tells me not everything of timelock got ripped out. cl.exe /nologo /MD /W3 /Zi /O2 /Oy- /I "./

Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.6.2

On 6/9/2017 6:09 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: With good fortune, all architecture-specific issues are fixed, and we are ready to bless a 1.6 initial release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path contains the candidate. +/- votes please [ ] Release apr 1.6.2 [+1] Release apr

Re: [VOTE] Release APR-UTIL 1.6.0

On 6/9/2017 6:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: As I mention in parent post, this is a distinct thread for any final votes and to tally vote count of apr-util 1.6.0 release. Usual http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ path for candidates. +/- votes please [+1] Release apr-util 1.6.0

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

On 5/6/2017 2:59 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 12:23:52 +0100 Nick Kew wrote: BTW, we could use reports from Windows, Netware and Beos on what works for you. The one difference I see between 1.5 and 1.6 is testpipe of 1.6 Failed TestsTotal Fail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

solution. The right fix there is to just switch compiling sources for linking to a library, and let that library maintainer do their thing. So +1 to the dsp/mak change, but alternate CMakeFiles.txt feedback to follow... On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

cmake should be as well. http://svn.apache.org/r1805330 On 9/26/2017 7:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Proceeding with the understanding that mak, and dsp files are OK on -dev, thank you for the review in your schema, Steffen! Cheers, Bill On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Steffen

Re: expat removed from APR project (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA)

e to consume, but the cmake was done to turn windows builds into a conventional solution. The right fix there is to just switch compiling sources for linking to a library, and let that library maintainer do their thing. So +1 to the dsp/mak change, but alternate CMakeFiles.txt feedback to follow..

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; I'm not there to vote yet, my question is how did you expect us to build APU with a precompiled lib and this lib put where? Looking at both makafile.win and libaprutil.mak I see not

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/18/2017 7:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Two additional footnotes... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: On 10/18/2017 7:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following candidate packages; I'm not there to vote y

Re: Linking with libapr-1.lib on MS Windows using MSVC 19

No not really, but this gives me problems trying to build x86 on a x64 computer so I just remove it from makefile.win. !IF [$(COMSPEC) /c cl /nologo /? \ | $(SystemRoot)\System32\find.exe "x64" >NUL ] == 0 ARCH=x64 Release !ELSE ARCH=Win32 Release !ENDIF Are you using the VS20xx x64

Re: [Vote] apr-1.6.3, apr-util-1.6.1, apr-iconv-1.2.2 releases

On 10/19/2017 1:49 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Now, seeing Steffen's problems and what Michal had to go through to get this to build for him, so I'm -1 with apu 1.6.1. Sorry, I meant -0 as I'm not going to stop this from going out. I am still quite unhappy this was done midstream. I'll

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

On 9/11/2018 1:30 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 9/10/2018 2:22 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Please cast your votes on the following release candidate found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) Release apr-1.6.5    [  ] +/-1

Re: Showstoppers to 1.7.0?

My working copy just refuses to show the changes but the merge info is there, strange. Taking testencode.c from trunk and it builds great. Test passes. Thank you. cheers On 3/25/2019 4:05 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi Gregg, On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:17 AM Gregg Smith wrote: No, r1856096

Re: Showstoppers to 1.7.0?

= (unsigned char[]){'f', 'o', 'o'}; On 3/22/2019 4:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:37 PM Gregg Smith wrote: testencode doesn't want to compile on Visual Studio. A showstopper maybe not but it is nice to run the tests to compare with previous versions. abts.c testencode.c

Re: Showstoppers to 1.7.0?

I finally got time to give this 1.7.0 a try and utterly failed :) r1839494 fixed a problem run into on VC when r1816608 added support for IPv6 link-local address scope/zone mapping. r1839494 requires NT6. Our apr.hw is still targeting NT5 which has been EOL for eons now, 6.0 also as Vista

Re: Showstoppers to 1.7.0?

testencode doesn't want to compile on Visual Studio. A showstopper maybe not but it is nice to run the tests to compare with previous versions. abts.c testencode.c testencode.c(91): error C2059: syntax error: '}' testencode.c(206): error C2059: syntax error: '}' testencode.c(416): error C2059:

Re: apr-2 ... cleanup

Hello, On 5/13/2020 1:41 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Related mostly to Windows port 1. Remove all those .dsp, .dsw .mak files from APR trunk    None of them works for years.    Replace all that with cmake 2. Remove all _WIN32_WCE, APR_NOT_IN_WCE    Just a bunch of code for Windows CE that  

Re: apr-2 ... cleanup

, but they still can be. Prebuild events I admit are quite tough to hand job into both mak/dsp if needed. Regards On 5/13/2020 1:48 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 13/05/2020 22:08, Gregg Smith wrote: #1, I think this may be your opinion but not so much mine. No, .mak/defs are not in trunk