[EPEL-devel] Re: python39 in EPEL7

What do you mean by support? The only thing EPEL supports (using the term loosely) is enabling Fedora packagers to branch and build their packages for EPEL. Any maintainer of the Fedora python3.9 package (or any related package necessary for bootstrapping) can request an epel7 branch and start

Re: can't login FAS

Honggang LI kirjoitti 6.4.2021 klo 16.03: On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:54:42PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:27:52AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote: Hi, After input my FAS accout and password, I got this

Fedora-IoT-33-20210406.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20210315.0): ID: 845909 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/845909 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests

[389-devel] please review: PR 4718 - UI - Migrate database tables to Patternfly 4

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4718 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

* Ondrej Mosnacek: > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class > to the policy, all SELinux domains for which we don't add the >

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > The code is available. From what I remember, they had a fairly beefy > server dedicated to the indexing... But if somebody provides that, it > should be fairly easy to duplicate. Michael even expressed interest about setting up an instance, if I recall correctly,

Re: questions about "Fedora Localization Statistics"

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:16:59PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 06/04/2021 16:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > >>>Specifically those numbers are from the languagePopulation elements > >>>in the most recent CLDR release. >

Fedora-IoT-34-20210406.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210404.0): ID: 845798 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/845798 ID: 845807 Test: x86_64

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 01:20:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=userfaultfd(=1 > > lists a few candidates… > > You beat me to this suggestion. :) > > I'd love for Fedora to

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On 4/6/21 10:58 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:43 PM Colin Walters wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many >>> downgrades to complain

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=userfaultfd(=1 > lists a few candidates… You beat me to this suggestion. :) I'd love for Fedora to someday have a similar service! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > Hi all, > > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class > to the

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > Hi all, > > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class > to the

Re: Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > Hi all, > > Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the > userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in > Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class > to the

Looking for users of userfaultfd(2) syscall in Fedora

Hi all, Kernel 5.12 added support to SELinux for controlling access to the userfaultfd interface [1][2] and we'd like to implement this in Fedora's selinux-policy. However, once we add the corresponding class to the policy, all SELinux domains for which we don't add the appropriate rules will

Re: questions about "Fedora Localization Statistics"

On 06/04/2021 16:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: Specifically those numbers are from the languagePopulation elements in the most recent CLDR release. The data for DE in PL in CLDR specifically references a source:

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 06. 04. 21 v 16:02 Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 4/6/21 1:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: For example, what is common for Python "namepsace" packages, e.g. pkg_name.foo. 1) We want to test installed files, not what is in $PWD, so we set PYTHONPATH to

Fedora-34-20210406.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 18/189 (x86_64), 19/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210405.n.0): ID: 844541 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/844541 ID: 844731 Test: aarch64

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-04-07 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-04-07 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Re: questions about "Fedora Localization Statistics"

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 03:21:26PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 06/04/2021 15:16, Tom Hughes wrote: > >On 06/04/2021 14:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > >>I'm looking at https://languages.stg.fedoraproject.org/territories/pl/, > >>and it says: > >> > >>be (0.58 %) > >>csb

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:01 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> - libuv-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 >> - libuv-devel-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-devel-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 >> - libuv-static-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-static-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 >>

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:43 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many > > downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like > >

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:08 AM wrote: > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-04-07 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 > America/Indiana/Indianapolis >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > > More information available at: >

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

Hi, On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many > downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like > F34FTBFS, already excluded from the list). > > However, the list also

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210406.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210405.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210406.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 45 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 70.99 KiB Size of dropped packages:2.89 MiB Size

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:42:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > - icedtea-web-0:2.0.0-pre.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 > > icedtea-web-0:2.0.0-pre.0.3.alpha16.patched1.fc34.3 > > Versioning snafu - alpha 13 should not sort higher than alpha 16, I guess. In case it's not obvious, it's the change

Re: questions about "Fedora Localization Statistics"

On 06/04/2021 15:16, Tom Hughes wrote: On 06/04/2021 14:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I'm looking at https://languages.stg.fedoraproject.org/territories/pl/, and it says: be (0.58 %) csb official_regional (0.13 %) de official_regional (19 %) en (33 %) lt official_regional (0.021 %)

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/6/21 3:01 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote: […] 2. change %check not to rely on unpackaged files in buildroot That one is non-trivial and depends on the reason it is needed. For example, what is common for Python "namepsace" packages, e.g. pkg_name.foo. 1) We

Re: questions about "Fedora Localization Statistics"

On 06/04/2021 14:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I'm looking at https://languages.stg.fedoraproject.org/territories/pl/, and it says: be (0.58 %) csb official_regional (0.13 %) de official_regional (19 %) en (33 %) lt official_regional (0.021 %) pl official (96 %) ru (18 %) sli (0.031

[Bug 1943227] perl-Perl-Metrics-Simple-1.0.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943227 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1941319] perl-Perl-Metrics-Simple-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941319 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/6/21 1:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 04. 21 11:16, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/1/21 12:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote: * Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds  > ... * Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter

questions about "Fedora Localization Statistics"

I'm looking at https://languages.stg.fedoraproject.org/territories/pl/, and it says: be (0.58 %) csb official_regional (0.13 %) de official_regional (19 %) en (33 %) lt official_regional (0.021 %) pl official (96 %) ru (18 %) sli (0.031 %) szl (1.3 %) uk (0.39 %) I think it's be good to order

Fedora-IoT-35-20210406.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210405.0): ID: 82 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/82 ID:

Fedora-Rawhide-20210406.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 17/189 (x86_64), 15/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: can't login FAS

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:54:42PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:27:52AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote: > > > > Hi, > > After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message. > > > >

Re: can't login FAS

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:27:52AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote: > > Hi, > After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message. > >After input where? What place did you get this error?

Re: can't login FAS

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote: > Hi, > After input my FAS accout and password, I got this error message. > > After input where? What place did you get this error? > = > > 500 Internal Server Error > > Could not convert return value of the view

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210406.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210405.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210406.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 65 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 14.44 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Miro Hrončok wrote: > […] >> 2. change %check not to rely on unpackaged files in buildroot > That one is non-trivial and depends on the reason it is needed. > For example, what is common for Python "namepsace" packages, e.g. > pkg_name.foo. > 1) We want to test installed files, not what is

[CANCELLED] Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-04-06)

We would hold the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net, but there is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #2582 F35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields from spec files

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

* Neal Gompa: > It's basically required for building containers that will work at > runtime where OpenShift assigns an arbitrary UID. I put something together It avoids the need to edit /etc/passwd to support dynamic user IDs for PID 1. Security

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > - libuv-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 > - libuv-devel-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-devel-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 > - libuv-static-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-static-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 > > libuv 1.41.0 was built for f34, but the bodhi update is stuck

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:36 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:23 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:30, Daniel Walsh wrote: > >> > >> On 4/3/21 02:34, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> > Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a): >

Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 12:42:33 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, Hello! Thanks very much for catching this. > - python-PyLEMS-doc-0:0.5.2-1.fc33 > python-PyLEMS-doc-0:0.5.1-2.fc34 > - python3-PyLEMS-0:0.5.2-1.fc33 > python3-PyLEMS-0:0.5.1-2.fc34 > > Updated to 0.5.2 for f32, f33,

Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)

Hi everybody, It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like F34FTBFS, already excluded from the list). However, the list also includes some pretty important "critpath" packages (ostree (!), rpm-ostree,

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 06. 04. 21 11:16, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 4/1/21 12:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote: * Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds  > ... * Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:23 AM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:30, Daniel Walsh wrote: >> >> On 4/3/21 02:34, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> > Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a): >> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote: >> >>> On Thu,

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 02. 04. 21 v 12:07 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:33:48AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 03. 21

Re: memleax spec file and review

Done! Review Request: memleax - Debugs memory leak of a running process - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1946499 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Retiring from Perl maintenance

Hello, here is as a brief announcement with a certain impact on Perl packaging in Fedora: I found a different role in Red Hat which is incompatible with maintaining hundreds of packages. As a result, I will reassign my packages with a Red Hat's interrest to Michal Spacek (mspacek) who replaces

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/1/21 1:33 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote: > >* Strict checking for unpackaged content

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210406.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210405.0): ID: 843904 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/1/21 12:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote: * Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds > ... * Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always backwards compatible. We

[rpms/perl-Net-IPv6Addr] PR #1: Tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-IPv6Addr` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-IPv6Addr/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

License change: R-rvest GPLv3 -> MIT

As in subject; change will be in F34+ only due to necessary dependencies. -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: memleax spec file and review

Il 04/04/21 23:55, Ian McInerney ha scritto: > > On Sun, 4 Apr 2021, 21:53 Germano Massullo, > mailto:germano.massu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Good day, I am creating a spec file [0] for memleax memory leaks > analyzer [1], but during build [2] I am getting error "invalid option: >

[rpms/perl-Net-IPv6Addr] PR #1: Tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-IPv6Addr` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-IPv6Addr/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210406.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210405.0): ID: 843725 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Re: F35 Change proposal: Smaller Container Base Image (remove sssd-client, util-linux, shadow-utils) (Self-Contained Change)

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 20:30, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 4/3/21 02:34, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Dnia Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:30:30PM -0400, Neal Gompa napisał(a): > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote: > >>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Unless

fedpkg push failed for main

Hi, I have been maintaining open-vm-tools for several years, but never encountered this failure before. Today, I got following error for the first time: $ fedpkg push Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads Compressing objects:

Re: Outreachy Applicant Introduction

Hi Shreya, welcome to Fedora QA and thanks for showing interest in our project. There shouldn't be any issues with Ubuntu - the javascript dependencies are not distro specific. Lukas On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 11:39 AM wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am Shreya Gupta, a sophomore at IIT Patna,