On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c51ef03e91 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
27 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-111c0bd3f5
ntfs-3g-2022.5.17-2.el8
4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ed4f47e9f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-69c4ed93d1
ntfs-3g-2022.5.17-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aa30752bd2
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el7
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fe3af9cc3f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-385dd3d5e4 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried it
there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe the same problem.
Scott
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an
error handler that should not be installed by a
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 8/15/22 04:37, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 08. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
>> On 8/11/22 10:23, Ben Beasley wrote:
>>> I don’t enjoy this topic at all, but I feel obligated to contribute some
>>> relevant links.
>>>
>>> A previous discussion on the packaging mailing list[1]
Hello,
beginning with scummvm version 2.6.0, the license for the packages scummvm
and scummvm-tools have been changed as follows:
scummvm: "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD and OFL and MIT and ISC"
scummvm-tools: "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT"
Best regards,
Christian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118460
Bug ID: 2118460
Summary: perl-IO-Async-0.802 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Async
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MinizipRenaming
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MinizipRenaming
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118427
Bug ID: 2118427
Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 03:47:28PM +0200, Petr Salaba wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> My name is Petr and I'm a new intern at RedHat, hoping to start
> maintaining packages in Fedora, currently starting with some perl packages.
> Other than that I've made a few open source contributions here and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck ---
The package perl-Data-Float has been built meanwhile, it's submitted to EPEL 9
testing, and there is an active buildroot override. Thus perl-Data-Entropy can
now be built for EPEL 9 testing, too.
--
The Bug Blocker Review meeting got cancelled today as Ben has other things
to take care of
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 2:23 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel the
> QA meeting today. I am going to be on a plane to devconf.us, so I
> won't be
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ed4f47e9f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8ed4f47e9f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 09:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 08. 22 v 13:58 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 04:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
>> automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c51ef03e91 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c51ef03e91
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
since i started guayadeque to compile with wxsqlite3-4.8.2-5.fc36.x86_64 and
wxGTK-3.1.5-6.fc36.x86_64 compile, the program starts on F37/F38 with the
following error message:
../src/generic/imaglist.cpp(44): assert "m_size != wxSize(0, 0)"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-385dd3d5e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-385dd3d5e4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-242fcfacf0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-242fcfacf0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon, Aug 15 2022 at 03:37:45 PM +0200, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Yes, that is fine. But at the same time, there is no warning like
"Your system won't be provided with updates anymore, because it is
EOL" followed up with "While there is new version available, your
system is too old to be upgraded,
On 8/15/22 09:37, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 15. 08. 22 v 13:58 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
I think for Fedora 34 and beyond, the user will now get a big banner
on Workstation saying 'A new version of the operating system is ready
for you' which will require them to click that they want to upgrade
Hello everybody,
My name is Petr and I'm a new intern at RedHat, hoping to start
maintaining packages in Fedora, currently starting with some perl packages.
Other than that I've made a few open source contributions here and there,
and I'm hoping I can learn some new things along the way.
Here is
Dne 15. 08. 22 v 13:58 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 04:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would
not need
yesterday to update the system from F33
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.090-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117024
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|ASSIGNED
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220813.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220815.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 69
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 359.63 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel the
QA meeting today. I am going to be on a plane to devconf.us, so I
won't be able to run it.
Thanks folks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net
Hi,
Am 15.08.22 um 13:58 schrieb Stephen Smoogen:
I don't know of an Operating System which isn't a rolling operating
system which works this way. MacOS, Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora
all require a manual clickthru to get to the 'next' version which is
available. This is because these
Hi,
since i started guayadeque to compile with wxsqlite3-4.8.2-5.fc36.x86_64 and
wxGTK-3.1.5-6.fc36.x86_64 compile, the program starts on F37/F38 with the
following error message:
../src/generic/imaglist.cpp(44): assert "m_size != wxSize(0, 0)" failed in
GetImageCount(): Invalid image list
OLD: Fedora-37-20220814.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220815.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.14 MiB
Size
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 04:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
> automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would not need
> yesterday to update the system from F33 (I am rawhide user, so pardon my
> ignorance).
>
> Therefore my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fe3af9cc3f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fe3af9cc3f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7818db773a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7818db773a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On 15. 08. 22 12:36, Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
Miro Hrončok píše v Po 15. 08. 2022 v 12:04 +0200:
Hello,
for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build
with
dependency issues like this:
Wild guess: could it be excluded by the -java* pattern in the kickstart
file?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Thanks for responding. So, this appeared to have worked now:
dnf update fedora-gpg-keys
dnf update fedora-repos --release 37
(--release 38 made no difference for now). And now this works, because
gpg-pubkey-eb10b464-6202d9c6 is now installed:
$ dnf download --assumeyes --releasever=rawhide zip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116190
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Miro Hrončok píše v Po 15. 08. 2022 v 12:04 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build
> with
> dependency issues like this:
>
>
Wild guess: could it be excluded by the -java* pattern in the kickstart
file?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117966
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118082
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
Hello,
for a few days now, the Fedora 37 Python Classroom Lab fails to build with
dependency issues like this:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- package emacs-1:28.1-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 15th
August(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat).
The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You
can join us over:
Matrix:
> Major version updates often change behaviour of the apps or the system itself
It's also worth mentioning that if some packages are retired, they will not be
available in the new Fedora version. In the old days, this would mean you
might get some old & broken packages stuck on your system;
Hi,
I've decided to write a Fedora change that will contain all of the
information about this possible retirement.
I have to fill the dependencies that will be affected by this change, so
I'm looking for the tool/command which will give them to me.
I've seen multiple suggestions here in this
On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 10:20 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I don't think that Fedora should allow to keep the system outdated
> and without updates.
Hi,
Fedora is not a rolling distro. Najor version updates often change
behaviour of the apps or the system itself, not talking that there are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117966
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Dne 15. 08. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
On 8/11/22 10:23, Ben Beasley wrote:
I don’t enjoy this topic at all, but I feel obligated to contribute some
relevant links.
A previous discussion on the packaging mailing list[1] concluded that it
doesn’t seem possible to package HTML
I just wonder, is the system upgrade to the more recent Fedora
automatic? I suspect that the answer is *no*, otherwise I would not need
yesterday to update the system from F33 (I am rawhide user, so pardon my
ignorance).
Therefore my question is, can it be automatic? Is it configurable?
Just
58 matches
Mail list logo
