* Chris Murphy:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>>
>>> From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally
>>> unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is
>>> unsupportable. That leaves two
Dne 21. 07. 23 v 6:32 Chris Murphy napsal(a):
It should be straightforward to have mock create a subvolume for each chroot
instead of a directory. Subvolumes have their own inode pool.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1146
PR is welcome.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, at 11:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
>> From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally
>> unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is
>> unsupportable. That leaves two options:
>>
>> 1. Break
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> From this thread, it appears that non-LFS 32-bit software is fundamentally
> unsupportable in the long run, just like software with 32-bit time_t is
> unsupportable. That leaves two options:
>
> 1. Break the ABI, preferably in such a way that causes non-LFS
>code to
On 7/20/23 11:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
>> On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>>>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The list of updates that
Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:07 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Demi Marie Obenour:
>
> > On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
> >>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>>
But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>
>>> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
>>> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
>>> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
>>> doesn't raise any alarm bells
* Daniel P. Berrangé:
>> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
>> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
>> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
>> doesn't raise any alarm bells (except maybe the 6.3 kernel):
>> (see
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:47:39PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >
> > On 7/14/23 6:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Neal Gompa:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Jul
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:46:40PM -, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen > wrote:
> >
> > But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> > started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> > The list of updates that were applied to
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
> doesn't raise any alarm bells (except maybe the
On 7/14/23 4:47 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 7/14/23 6:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Neal Gompa:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
Fedora lists are
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> On 7/14/23 6:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Neal Gompa:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer
> >>> wrote:
>
> Fedora lists are
On 7/14/23 17:32, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen said:
>> XFS does have a hack^Wmount option to force inodes into the 32-bit
>> range, but just FWIW we almost never see users running into problems
>> with 32-bit applications (but maybe because they know about the
>> mount
Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen said:
> XFS does have a hack^Wmount option to force inodes into the 32-bit
> range, but just FWIW we almost never see users running into problems
> with 32-bit applications (but maybe because they know about the
> mount option...)
Aren't even most 32-bit
On 7/14/23 6:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Neal Gompa:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
I can only forward this for your information.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:28:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
>
> * Today / soon, I will just reinstall all the buildvm-x86 vm's.
> Thats pretty trivial to do (thanks ansible). It may cause some builds to
> restart as I move things around, but it shouldn't be too much.
ok, this is
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:28:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > The 32-bit binary is what suffers the consequences.
> >
> > The workload that /causes/ the problem can be anything which creates
> > lots of files.
> >
>
> I am aware of that, but having something concretely easily
> reproducible
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:58 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:49:04AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 8:48 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > > * Miroslav Suchý:
> > >
> > > > Dne 14. 07. 23 v 13:53 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> > > >> What about
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:49:04AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 8:48 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * Miroslav Suchý:
> >
> > > Dne 14. 07. 23 v 13:53 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> > >> What about impact beyond the builders?
> > >>
> > >> Are end users are expected to do
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 8:48 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Miroslav Suchý:
>
> > Dne 14. 07. 23 v 13:53 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> >> What about impact beyond the builders?
> >>
> >> Are end users are expected to do this? Do we have a tool for this?
> >
> > Close to zero. You have to do a
* Miroslav Suchý:
> Dne 14. 07. 23 v 13:53 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
>> What about impact beyond the builders?
>>
>> Are end users are expected to do this? Do we have a tool for this?
>
> Close to zero. You have to do a really lots of builds. And keep the
> buildroots of these (failed) builds.
Dne 14. 07. 23 v 13:53 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
What about impact beyond the builders?
Are end users are expected to do this? Do we have a tool for this?
Close to zero. You have to do a really lots of builds. And keep the buildroots
of these (failed) builds.
For normal users the
* Neal Gompa:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >
>> > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
>> > I can only forward this for your information.
>> >
>> > This causes
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:28:55PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
> > I can only forward this for your information.
> >
> > This causes problems with the i686
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:15 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:53 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Fedora lists are hostile to
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:53 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
> > > I can only forward this for your
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
> > I can only forward this for your information.
> >
> > This causes problems with the i686
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
> I can only forward this for your information.
>
> This causes problems with the i686 builders.
I wonder how this only started to happen recently? Has something
Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so
I can only forward this for your information.
This causes problems with the i686 builders.
Thanks,
Florian
--- Begin Message ---
As far as I can tell, btrfs assigns inode numbers sequentially using
this function:
int
31 matches
Mail list logo
