Reminder from: digitalradio Yahoo! Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/cal
Illinois D-STAR Net
Wednesday April 7, 2010
9:00 pm - 10:00 pm
(This event repeats every week.)
Location: Illinois D-STAR Reflector Channel REF001B
Notes:
Illinois D-STAR Repeaters can Participate in the
Hi all,
Just had my arcing power line pole fixed and my noise has dropped off to
zero on all HF bands except 160m, fantastic!!! And a result.
A friend of mine said that his noise floor was -110db. Impressive I think.
All I know from my spectrum scope is that mine has dropped by about
On Friday, May 14, I am the moderator (and speaker) at the SDR forum at the
2:30 PM - 5 PM session. I have two speakers (Scotty on openhpsdr, and I
speak on general SDR topics).
I need to fill out this time and this leaves at least 1.5 hours to fill. I
would like to get this settled as soon as
Hi Bob,
Will your presentation be available via YouTube or similar? I'm unable to
attend this year due to gardening requirements (85 year-old mother dictated
this), I would very much like to view the SDR presentations.
If homeland security let me come over in 2011 I'll contact you.
I 110% agree with you there.
Bonnie (yes, I'm not bashful about calling her out) controls ALE as if it
were HERS. In my opinion, it's little more than a business for her...not only
can you join HF-ALE, but you can also BUY MERCHANDISE.
ALE/141A is great in a military application, but
This is little more than a frequency grab by Bonnie that would benefit the
HF-ALE group, I feel, the most. If adopted, this would give Bonnie her own
frequencies...channels if you will, that she or ANYONE else from the HF-ALE
network could claim...and then chase away legal ops using her/their
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:37:25PM -, kb2hsh wrote:
This is little more than a frequency grab by Bonnie that would
benefit the HF-ALE group, I feel, the most. If adopted, this would
give Bonnie her own frequencies...channels if you will, that she or
ANYONE else from the HF-ALE network
For me one word sums up Bonnie - and it's Arrogant. Crackpot and Barking Mad
also come to mind, but so does the word lawyer so I'll say no more.
What's quite amazing with her spectrum demands is that she wants part of
160m as well as the WARC bands.
This will just get digital mode users
kb2hsh wrote:
This is little more than a frequency grab by Bonnie that would benefit the
HF-ALE group, I feel, the most.
OK, so I have to ask how would it benefit HFLink
- HFLink already has well established centers of activity in the current
bandplan
- ALE by definition does not
Hello Tony,
I bet Patrick could make that happen.
It could be possible, but too much complex, so the most probable is that it
will not happened.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 6:59 AM
Subject:
kb2hsh wrote:
Bonnie (yes, I'm not bashful about calling her out) controls ALE as if it
were HERS. In my opinion, it's little more than a business for her...not
only can you join HF-ALE, but you can also BUY MERCHANDISE.
OK, this is going too far. I'm heavily involved in HFLink
Transmitting soundings without checking for activity on the frequency,
or by not sounding if there is activity, is an AUTOMATIC operation. Do
you deny that soundings that cover many frequencies in a short time are
not transmitted without ALWAYS listening first! That would be hard to
believe!
KH6TY wrote:
It would give ALE ops more frequencies
This is a huge leap of paranoia.. ALE operation by definition does
not want or even can utilize more frequencies. Hams who want to use
ALE already have well established frequencies to use. There is no
advantage to adding more, and really
It does not matter if ALE ops do not intend to USE more frequencies or
not. Apparently the interest in PC-ALE is so small, the impact would be
minimal anyway.
However, to support changing any allocations to provide more space for
wide-bandwidth automatic stations, no matter who will use them,
Want to fight to get rid of semi-auto operation? Knock yourself out.
It's allowed now under FCC regs and is not likely to change. More
influential groups than the mythical omnipotent evil mastermind Bonnie
will make sure that will not change!
I think this misses the point. Yes, there are some
Alan Barrow wrote:
My view is that debates about digi-modes are tempest in a teapot. The
broader issues are around impact of contesting, allowing for continuing
to advance the state of the art, etc.
I think you hit the nail on the head. The broader issues encompass
contesting, advancing the
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM, kb2hsh kb2...@amsat.org wrote:
I 110% agree with you there.
Bonnie (yes, I'm not bashful about calling her out) controls ALE as if it
were HERS. In my opinion, it's little more than a business for her...not only
can you join HF-ALE, but you can also BUY
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM, kb2hsh kb2...@... wrote:
I 110% agree with you there.
Bonnie (yes, I'm not bashful about calling her out) controls ALE as if it
were HERS. In my opinion, it's little more than a
18 matches
Mail list logo
