Gents,
I agree - isn't the 30m ham band being used for the purpose of adding
legitimate Amateur Radio RF to an otherwise low-use band? I believe that the
FCC would LOVE to strip this band from us and auction it off (remember to what
happened to the 220 MHz band). Who cares what content there
Simon,
Check this out:
http://www.dspguru.com/sw/tools/filtdsn.htm
I have tried ScopeFIR so far.
Regards,
Sergio, EA3DU
Mensaje original
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recibido: 20/01/2008 23:15
Para:
Asunto: [digitalradio] FIR Filters
I have written my own code to design FIR filters using
Roger J. Buffington wrote:
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Maybe all would be well if the word WinLink had not been used.
Probably. Other forms of amateur communication listen before they
transmit, thereby preventing unnecessary QRM.
Please, can we not go round this circle *yet
I left WSJT in mode JT65A monitoring last night as well.
80M, 3.576MHz on the dial and no deep search (see the 1 0 at the end
of the captures). Again, all whilst I was asleep. HI.
043800 6 -18 -0.1 -3 3 * CQ N4UPX EM50 1 0
043900 0 -18 -0.6 19 1
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Once, I had a clash with a british net controller, which I regarded
as
fascist instantly, imposing a limit of 5 K per piece of mail sent
to
the british network. It happened
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts.
Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations
using the two different systems please?
For example, I received the following today
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was it, no report, not even OOOs. I was using what, in the
guide, says is the European standard of sending the received dB signal
strength, but the EA station was using the US version, appart from no OOO.
Sorry, my mistake, I missread the guide. Seems
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
Look like real ones to me, now if only you could work them while sleeping !
No point in stopping up tonight though.
2008 ARRL RTTY Round-Up
Begins 1800 UTC Saturday, ends 2400 UTC Sunday (*January 5-6, 2008).
*At 1800 on the dot I had to give up any chance of
Mind you, I do have to pay attention to the difference between the
column marked DT and the one marked dB when sending a report - Ooops!
I'm having a problem coverting to the HF reporting system from the MS
one. Well, that is my excuse.
Dave (G0DJA)
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one receives
FALSE CQs. When I first started using WSJT on HF and left on
overnight , I received a few CQs from Japan on 40M but I was on a
frequency that is not used in Japan.
That's why I *never* have deep search
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi Andy,
7072 is not best the freq in my part of the world . Heavy QRM from SSB.
But I will try copy you
of course ;)
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
OK, I've got NBEMS running, and decoding signals on 20M, and I've run
FLARQ and the file folders appear to be OK.
So,
Oh dear, fist trial with NBEMS was not a happy one, for me, I'm afraid...
Appart from not knowing my way round the program, which is not the fault
of the program of course, I also had terrible trouble with it missing
keystrokes.
Either it gave lowercase where I wanted uppercase, or it missed
kh6ty wrote:
Dave,
Do not try to type at the same time you are linked with another station,
because flarq is going to be sending keystrokes to VBdigi, often at the same
time as you try to type. As you point out, NBEMS is a messaging system, not
a chat system. It is also primarily for 2m
Rick wrote:
When you loaded your software, did you get a warning that a file was
newer on your computer and that it recommended you keep the file? In my
case it was one of the system32 files: MSCOMCTL.OCX.
Yes, that is a known issue. You should have kept the newer file.
Dave (G0DJA)
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
It makes sense to me.
If you have TWO soundcards set in your PC, you need to tell VBdigi the
soundcard settings you want to use. I have the same setting as you, I
have an internal motherboard based souncard and a Creative PCI card.
The default Windows souncard is the
If only I didn't have to sleep!
Found a load of the following CQ calls on 80M, from leaving WSJT running
overnight...
034600 3 -16 1.6 100 3 * CQ KD5JGA EM161 0
034700 0 -15 3.3 -471 3
034800
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
Of the 15 or so logs received so far, the comments appear to be.
The bands (40 and 20M) were in very poor conditions
I'm sorry that I wasn't able to be as active as I wanted to be. A
family illness and a guest staying overnight on New Years Eve/New Years
Day
Dave Bernstein wrote:
15 QSOs in about 2 hours of operating, just under half with European
stations, all on 20m. There was an MFSK-16 station QRV that
threatened my sanity; it wasn't the QRM, it was listening to 2 hours
of that moronic music that made me feel like Red Buttons in the
I am trying to update my DRCC member tracker, designed to help me keep
track of the DRCC members that I work per band and mode. However, the
latest database system exports the information with speechmarks arround
the DRCC number and name and I don't want them.
Can anyone advise how best to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to update my DRCC member tracker, designed to help me keep
track of the DRCC members that I work per band and mode. However, the
latest database system exports the information with speechmarks arround
the DRCC number and name and I don't want them
This is what often puts me off HF...
I see this.
13:40:02 Main
aoytc n ?SK
CQ CQ CQ DE UV5QA UV5QA UV5QA
CQ C
CQ CQ CQ DE UV5QA UV5QA UV5QA
CQ CQ CQ DE UV5QA UV5QA UV5QA
PSE K
So, I call him, to get this...
13:40:13 Main
DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX DX
CQ CQ CQ DE UV5QA UV5QA UV5QA
.
144 * 7 = 1008 TOTAL CONTEST SCORE.
(multipliers count PER band, e.g. K3UK DRCC number 000 , worked on 40
and 20M is two multipliers. Grid square FNO2, worked on 40M and 20M, is
two multipliers
Submit a log SUMMARY in ASCII format to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by Feb 1 2008.
Results will be posted
Phil Wells wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave wrote:
I understand the basics of using a balun, but have a question
about the specifics.
Sorry to have to ask this Dave, but if you understand the basics,
why
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n6vl wrote:
Let's give the DRCC a shot!
Hi Steve,
I wasn't aware of DRCC, ut then I guess no one can keep up to date with
everything that goes on. HI.
Ah, now I have a very red face, as I didn't recognise the name of the
group that I'm already
n6vl wrote:
Let's give the DRCC a shot!
Hi Steve,
I wasn't aware of DRCC, ut then I guess no one can keep up to date with
everything that goes on. HI.
The problem with creating another organisation that encourages digital
modes is that there are already two that I know of, which are
Dave wrote:
I understand the basics of using a balun, but have a question about the
specifics. Using a dipole, what would be the difference between using a
4:1 balun compared to a 6:1 balun? Which would I choose, and why would
I choose it? Planning on feeding the dipole direct from the
Zack wrote:
From the ARRL CONTESTER'S RATE SHEET, 17 OCTOBER 2007
Joe K1JT reports, Some of us have been experimenting recently with
two new narrow-band digital modes called JT2 and JT4. A basic
description and a status report is now available at
http://tinyurl.com/2c7ktb
If you are
Zack wrote:
I left out part of the last line.
From the ARRL CONTESTER'S RATE SHEET, 17 OCTOBER 2007
Joe K1JT reports, Some of us have been experimenting recently with
two new narrow-band digital modes called JT2 and JT4. A basic
description and a status report is now available at
I'm considering getting a new radio for the car and the choice, at the
moment, is between the Icom IC-E2820, with the optional UT-123 board, or
the Kenwood TM-D710E or V71E. Depending on whether I decide that I'm
going to be active with APRS again in the future.
Now, all the other
Rick wrote:
The problem that I have, is that except for narrower bandwidth and some
non amateur radio applications through the internet, I just have not
been able to come up with solid reasons. And there are some serious
negative trade offs you have to make.
Thanks for the feedback
Lou Everett, Sr wrote:
This link definately doesn't have any list, nor does it terminate as it
should.
Lou WA5LOU
Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It took a while, but I have mined the information associated with
the
2900 plus members of the Digitalradio mail
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
I don't want to be a policeman , I think it is to many of them already,
but I have a wish. 14109.5 seems to be a bit overcrowded when
everyone are sounding and trying to make a AMD qso. What about QSYing
to another frequency when a contact is establish on 14109.5?
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I'm an odd ham in that I smile with amusement when amateur radio
groups rush to defend frequencies and worry about some non-hams
getting our frequencies. I happen to think we have more than we
need and can easily give some away.
I read the rest of the message and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will be monitoring 14,077.5 tomorrow. Today the only thing I heard was a
noise that sounded like someone playing a flute badly.
That was probably JT65A or one of the other WSJT modes.
Dave (G0DJA)
Simon Brown wrote:
Doesn't this assume an accurate system clock? I think I see a class in gMFSK
/ fldidgi to compare input = output but for calibration we need an
accurate source.
I use Dimension-4 to keep my PC clock on time, but there are other
similar programs about.
I suspect that
Simon Brown wrote:
Expect more Olivia in a few days, possibly some Domino modes next week.
Why - because I'll be letting my test team lose on a new DM780 kit which
already supports Throb and MFSK.
Just had my 1st MFSK-16 QSO uning Simons' DM780 multi-mode digital
program and I have a
audio transformers and a couple of
opto-isolators for PTT and FSK. You could build the
whole thing for less that $10.00. My webpage give the
diagram that the Rascal uses.
73 and good Luck
Joe K0BX
--- Dave Corio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe, thanks for the info! What puzzles me is
that I
As far as I can determine the BUXCOMM GLX Rascal is
the same for the 746 and 756 series.
You should go to:
http://www.commparts.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=8products_id=130236
and get this one, plug it in and be working FSK in
less than 10 minutes.
I am using the BUXCOMM GLX Rascal on
did wrong with one of your alleged messages.
It seems to me anyway.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
-- John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else getting these messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED] when they post to the list ? ?
At 06:14 PM 6/7/2006, you wrote:
MDaemon has
"digitalradio" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
using the PK unit on 7075 or is it the PTC unit? You are
bloody fortunate to be able to drop the bucks for one of the
SCS offerings.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:41 AM 5/26/2006, you wrote:
If I am correct, WL2K HF system is dependent on PACTOR. PACTOR
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
"digitalradio" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Hobby and craft supply
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yah
had a fresh line of thinking
thanks.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
Erik KI4HMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/ / / / / / / / S N I P
The original question though was whether it wouldn't be
better to use a more commonly available (i.e. cheaper)
protocol, especially as it would increase the number
http://www.ure.es/winurecon/descarga/WinURECon-2.0-inst.exe
Mensaje original
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recibido: 08/03/2006 1:34
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] EA PSK31 TEST software
SINCE I CANT SPEAK OR READ SPANISH, WHERE EXACTLY IS
THE DOWNLOAD BUTTON
Same thing here, I'll try another download later.
Jerry WW0E
--
-- Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
There are a lot of mode titles missing. The buttons work ok but fiding
Curious, perhaps a bad downloading. Try again, if it continues, PSE
Hi guys - what is PAX, and where can I download it?
Jerry WW0E
-- Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello John,
RR for all. If a better QRG, acceptable by all regions could be chosen for
PAX QSOs, it will be welcome!
73
Patrick
- Original
50 matches
Mail list logo
