--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave dco...@... wrote:
Does anyone use JT65A on 17 or 30 meters, and if so, what frequency is used
on both?
Tnx es 73
Dave
KB3MOW
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the 80 meter jt65A contact tonight. Most use 10.139 for jt65a but it
is crowded with Winlink,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley jbrad...@... wrote:
Hey man you are preaching to the choir!!! ALE400 is a great mode, even at
higher latitudes such as I am.
Now if we can only convince people to give it a try.
John
VE5MU
Echo, preaching to the choir!
I
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
I'll agree with John, while many here will find ALE400 easy to
tackle, many average hams will be intimidated by an unfamiliar
process. That is why Skip Teller's concepts behind NBEMS are good,
using mode that many hams use
I have not been able to get it to boot; no problems with the earlier release.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W mrf...@... wrote:
Have you been able to get this alpha to boot up?
(Note: you have to change erac to esrac in the main url to access the site.)
73,
Hi Jim,
Been awhile since I have see Picture Packet. If your version is missing
features you probably have the lite version. See:
http://www.huntting.com/picturepacket/
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jim seeber wb3...@... wrote:
Hi, new user here, Jim kw3u in NE Pa.
Thanks for the information, actually a good idea. Believe we used to have our
original FeldHell club net in that area or up from there a bit; not a heavily
used band slice usually, but might need to dodge some Winlink Pactor I and II
stuff.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony d...@... wrote:
All,
Just copied a most interesting CQ message on 20 meter PSK31 (call sign
purposely deleted)
CQ Moon...CQ Mars...CQ Nearby Star Systems...CQ Alien Lifeforms Or Fellow
Men In Black...DE X Calling CQ and Standing By
An
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, doug_helbling doug_helbl...@... wrote:
Thanks for the welcome and the great advice and counsel,
Patrick/Andrew/Christian/Marc/Simon/Siegfried et al.
I did some more poking around on my rig, and found that my audio input to the
PC was indeed the Mic
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Fred VE3FAL flesn...@... wrote:
What frequency you folks been using?
No idea where Kim is listening; I am usually on 3.576 near or after sunset and
occasionally on 14.076 on the weekends during daylight.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
You might try reducing the AF level into your sound card; sounds like it is
being over-driven...aim for about 0 db in your Rx noise box assuming you are
using WSJT.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Kim kimme...@... wrote:
There is a VA3 station on JT65A the past two days
Hello Ed,
Most likely JT65A as activity on 20 meters is generally centered
around 14.076. This mode is part of WSJT's suite of modes. It excels
at weak signal work using very brief message formats and 60 second
xmit/rx sequences.
See http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ for details.
73,
To echo what Rick stated,
FAE400 is an extremely useful ARQ mode that has a lot of potential;
robust yet reasonably narrow. Works very well, just a shame so few use it.
NBEMS is also a good ARQ suite, but a lot slower when using HF
friendly modes. No sure the lock-up time using MFSK16 has been
Hello Francois,
What frequency was it on? If it was on or about 14.070 USB dial
frequency, it was most likely JT65A. JT65A sounds like very very slow
DominoEX.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Francois Rochon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am listening on 20 meters to a very
Hi Mel,
Well from North America I work South Africa nightly on 7.076 using
WSJT modes. The ZK/VK stations come later here, 0300 local or so. A
few EU stations on 7.039/7.038 but difficult to copy here due to CW
traffic.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the typo, meant ZL/VK...keys far too close together!
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mel,
Well from North America I work South Africa nightly on 7.076 using
WSJT modes. The ZK/VK stations come later here, 0300 local or so. A
few
Hi Frank,
I am running it under Vista on this box without any problems. I like
Multipsk for a variety of reasons. It offers many modes and despite
what some claim is a cluttered interface, I prefer being able to
change modes without fighting through numerous pull-down menus.
Suspect the biggest
Hello David,
I have not had that exact problem, so others might be able to shed
more light than I can.
First thing I would do is check for an open ground or a ground loop.
Also consider that your ptt ground is not necessarily your audio
ground.
Does the problem go away when you transmit into a
.
73,
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:16 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
Hello John,
Well I have seen no others, aside from you
Hello John,
Well I have seen no others, aside from you, complaining about qrm when
operating Pactor modes on the sole basis that you were using Pactor.
I am sure it happens as we all get benign qrm. As I have posted often,
it is sad some think Pactor modes are the issue when it is the Winlink
Hello Lynn,
That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the
files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk
group - alot of very helpful people there, although I am sure Patrick
monitors this group also.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In
Hello Jose,
You are correct, it does not seem that attended stations are always
listening stations. Have seem many clients qrming each other and
probably, to some locations, qrming the PMBO itself as they are
calling the PBMO that is already linked.
Might explain why, even though supposed busy
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gee I did no make the list.
Well, John, you did at least as well as I did or better.
73.
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin bmc@ wrote:
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hi Bill,
This is simply childish
Hello Leigh,
Yes this happens, but more commonly using MS -- check out random
hours(s) sometime.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This brings to mind the converse: it would be interesting if
possible to
have multiple TX going
And this:
As of 2008-01-12 21:51:22 UTC database contains 244754 entries with
2326 unique callsigns.
I know this is culled regularly by Joe for false decodes and incorrect
frequencies and such..but note that these are only JT65A
receptions; does not include the other WSJT modes.
73,
Bill
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After Tony Blair has solved the Israel-Palestine issue, he may be
needed to address those old fashioned RTTY folks who
Or This Was :)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the way I look at it, Bill ...
soapbox
A sounding message is simply the station's callsign as the ALE ID,
and soundings are only done if the station has an operator
All,
ARQ FAE in ALE400 has proven, in my limited experience, to be
extremely robust compared to other ARQ modes and occupies reasonable
bandwidth. How difficult would this mode be to port to FLARQ/NBEMS?
It seems to me to be tailor-made for this application (but what do I
know?). Is it a matter
Hello Jack,
In MultiPSK, the RS ID provides this function...automatically
changes mode and frequency also, when implemented. Not sure of any
other software that uses this function but it works very well and can
decode mode and center frequency fairly deep into the noise.
73,
Bill
--- In
---
Bill McLaughlin wrote:
Hello Jack,
In MultiPSK, the RS ID provides this function...automatically
changes mode and frequency also, when implemented. Not sure of any
other software that uses this function but it works very well and can
decode mode and center frequency fairly deep
Yes. A radio. No re sparkI even hear CW from time to time!
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin bmc@ wrote:
One I had trouble with the other day, was
Clover, but had not heard
Hi John,
If you want to set up a sked this weekend let me know. I use Winmail
to genrate NBEMS data mostly because I hate Outlook :)
Also, to be fair, FLARQ seemed to prefer the Winmail format to any
Outlook file I could generate. Maybe outlook express does better but
not willing to chance it.
You might try creating a shortcut to the mail folder and then drag the
shortcut wherever you desire.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm trying to follow the instructions in
VBdigi under Help-Radio email setup.
I navigate to
Yes for receive. Also, MultiPSK can also receive and transmit Pactor I
FEC.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago
but I don't have my
Hello Howard,
I use Pactor I every now and then for keyboard to keyboard. It is hit
and miss for me; more a novelty than an oft-used mode.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been recent comments attesting to the demise of
PACTOR I.
I suspect you are hearing JT2 which is very narrow and uses 2FSK and
DBPSK modulation for sync and data or JT4A at 17.5 BW and 4.375 spacing.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Around 2045Z Friday the 30th
Freq. 14076+1750
Mostly
I tend to agree with Charles in regard to a packet-only setup;
Flex32/Paxon is pretty slick.
MultiPSK in packet mode is more than just a terminal program; it needs
no external driver and does APRS, digipeats and mail (and probably
more). It is abit of a learning curve after using a more
Agree,
After several ARQ FAE qsos and some via unproto, the ALE400 mode does
surprisingly well both on the lower and higher bands...well worth
further investigation.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Patrick may be on to
Hello Omar and all,
http://www.w1hkj.com/emcpup.html
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, o. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Andrew and also hello to Darrel and all the group.
Thank you for the information. Where do I get to download the
software?
Best 73
Omar YK1AO
Hello Bonnie,
Not sure I proved anything :)
If I fall asleep on my keyer is that an unattended CW mode?
If I leave my vox on and background noise keys the xmitter is that
an attended SSB mode?
What is at issue is *intentional* automatic modes, not my cat
stepping on the ptt.
JT65 is not an
*confused look*
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
JT65 is not an automatic or semi-automatic mode in any sense of
the
definition.
Bill,
JT65a is certainly an automatic mode.
It is as automatic as any other automatic
Yes,
In a sense - it actually switches to the next *manually selected*
sequence when the time clicks; it is in no-way linked to any over
by another station (I know you know this Leigh, but just to clarify
for others).
It is the same as sending any macro or otherwise pre-canned message
on
Yes,
In a sense - it actually switches to the next *manually selected*
sequence when the time clicks; it is in no-way linked to any over
by another station (I know you know this Leigh, but just to clarify
for others).
It is the same as sending any macro or otherwise pre-canned message
on
Thanks to Joe's efforts try this site for a very useful JT65A HF site.
Thanks for your efforts, Joe.
Bill, N9DSJ
Thanks to Joe's efforts the below site is highly recommended for anyone
working JT65A on HF:
http://jt65.w6cqz.org/
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hi,
GMDSS DSC is receive only in Multipsk and the frequency mentioned was
correct...corresponds to channel 70 on the marine VHF allocations.
Am sure someone will correct me if this is not correct
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dr. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in
Hi,
The appeal of JT65 is multi-faceted...works great deep into the noise
so I can work stations as meager as more own at some distance. Also
the freq tolerance, as you mentioned.
It is automated so a double right click on another call sets things
in motion - sit back and watch!
Socially it
Hello Leigh,
Guess it depends on the operator, but do not think time is an issue
if the end result is worth itin the EME and MS world, an HF JT65A
contact speeds along, usually. Not to mention endless time some spend
in a pile-up, waiting for a net to come around to one or listening to
Hi,
Well with and JT65/JT6M/FSK441 modes you will not see a qso as
such...that you see shorthand messages like RO and OOO says your
setup is ok...these modes are not qso modes...it is for exchange of
calls, location and report and little more. You should see calls and
grid locations on the
Yes,
Thanks Joe..
Worked Cesco using PSKAM10, a mode I suspect few would otherwise look
for blindly.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to tremendous work of Joe N8FQ, we now have a new method of
interacting and arranging
Hi Brian,
It is under options on the main program window, not the SpecJT window.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, c6alk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks:
I have not been able to find how to turn off the Deep Search
function in WSJT version 5.9.0. The excellent Bozo
Hi,
7L4IOU and EA7DUD are both real;
Don't under-estimate yourself or the mode!
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, WN1Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy folks,
I had my first JT65A qso with wb6mlc, just
maybe 200 miles distant, no challenge there ...
we often talk on
All,
Actually an old controversy re JT65* modes in the EME community, dead
horse oft beaten but still think it is the mode suite of choice for
MS and EME; also think more to the point is what other weak signal
modes work as well or better with bandwidth taken into balance on HF?
If for a 60
No argument from me. Alot to be garnered from this...both technically
and socially. The discussion alone is of value. The mode suite is
pretty much what it is in context of its intent. That it provokes
interest on HF might be an arrow pointing towards abit different
goal. Might even mean that
Hi Howard,
Congrats!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, All.
I've been playing with this mode and making piece meal contacts as
it were while learning. Mostly, I've been receiving.
I know the thing works, but there's this
All,
Per topic, deepsearch is great for EME, a wonderful feature. But on HF
is is of little value and will only lead to false decodes and stations
answering you when you haven't transmitted.
Decode menu, JT65, check No deep search
Hope this helps..
73
Bill N9DSJ
:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:19:11 -
Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Per topic, deepsearch is great for EME, a wonderful feature. But
on
HF is is of little value and will only lead to false decodes and
stations answering you when you haven't transmitted.
Too right
I don't believe it happened.
Would need to see it myself.
Opps, I did see it happen
Good going Tony and Al.
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
Managned to work Al, XE2AT on JT65 with 5mw this
evening on 20 meters. All was using a 40
Hi,
Also go to the decode psuedo-button and disble deepsearch
options...might miss a weak sign in the deepsearch file but will
speed up the decodes...
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc
With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually
Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work although with little
margin!
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20
meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem
there was some room to go
Well done! Congratulations...
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Andrew anda John:
Oh. Sorry by delay in the answer, but today I was involved in a
local
special Radio Chidrens Event, a kind of field-day to show how
the
radio
In WSJT, F5 key is your friend!
RO means you received the OOO
it is a shorthand roger for the OOO report...
Bill N9DSJ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony, I got confused when trying to explain, maybe you will be
better. Can
you explain whch steps
Glad I have never ever done that! (and if you believe that..)
Bill N9DSJ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
Not sure what that was about -- could be that he
forgot to click the next message -- it happens
).
Tony
Hi Bill,
Not ignorance at all, it is not very intuitive!
It means (basically) that Tony heard WD4KPD calling CQ DX in JT65 mode
on 14.076.
file ID (time based): 001000
sync: 5
strength: -11 db
time offset: -0.2 (in seconds)
freq offset: 277 (in Hz)
sync width: 3
message type: normal (*)
Hi Andy,
May well be, what JT65 decode parameters do you have set? It is a
valid call in the deep search file: JA7BJP,QM07GNnote the 0 10
decode at the end of the line -- it gives one a clue as to
the source of the decoded text/call - in this case 0 means no
Reed-Solomon decode but a 10
Hello Dan,
First, congratulations on the General ticket!
Am sure if you give us details as to the software you are using and
what modes are of interest (hopefully they coincide!), there are many
hear that would be glad to help you. Suspect PSK31 would be the
easiest mode to start with; the
Hello Dan,
First, congratulations on the General ticket!
Am sure if you give us details as to the software you are using and
what modes are of interest (hopefully they coincide!), there are many
here that would be glad to help you. Suspect PSK31 would be the
easiest mode to start with; the usual
A tribute to my Big 15 Wattson an 80 meter antenna :(
says alot about the mode
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
andrewobrie@ wrote:
Good contact Tony. Let me see
] wrote:
Bill,
Nice going and yes, it does say a lot for this
mode. Been a while since we QSO'd on 6 meter
meteor scatter. Worked Jerry (KC0HLN) the other
day...
031800 11 -5 0.1 -16 3 # KT2Q N9DSJ EN52
OOO 1 0
Tony KT2Q
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Echo...
No need for everyone to be on the same exact freq..spread out abit.
200 Hz is usually enough. You can work multiple qso's at the same
time if you watch the DF...but not if everyone is one the same freq
during the same sequence..
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Hi Les,
you were -15 to -21 db here but decoded well on my 80 meter antenna.
N5SIX heard you better on his 8ft wire :)
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Keppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
i need a vk/zl and a s.america for wac on
3.576
seen both usb and lsb used..
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any idea what frequency is used for 80m JT65a?
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
Hi Andy,
Think there is a mixed bag; some of use have used the WSJT modes for
some time on vhf/uhf for EME and MS;p so we tend to stick to known
conventions. So far I have seen no reason to deviate from that...
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh! What are you talking about, Andy?
{snipped}
I blame Joe Taylor.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hi Danny,
Seems ok; select a mode then hit the monitor buttonscreen will
be black until you go into monitor mode...
Bill, N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK Guys Ive gotten hung up from the git go here on setting this
thing up.
Went
Hello Rick,
Try MT63 under heavy QRN conditions; alot of downsides but for
bucking qrn/qrm have found this about the bestCHIP modes also
seem to do well in high qrn environmentsboth are wide bandwidth
(relatively) so this may well be a part of it all..
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In
Hello Jeff,
Congratulations on the upgrade. for BPSK31 your best bets are to poke
arounnd 3.580, 7.070 or 14.070 - that is where the bulk of activity
is depending upon conditions and time of day.
73 and good luck!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jeffnjr484 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joe,
my guess (and indeed it is a guess) is 4 or 5 baud DominoEX or one of
the JT65 (A,B,or C) modes...hard drive on the computer died so cannot
play it back to decode it until I get it all up and running
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Veldhuis [EMAIL
Odd,
Posted this once and see mutiple instances of it --- believe the same
thing is being observed on other Yahoo groups but apologies in any case,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Joe,
{snipped}
with some of the
nit picking questions Hams ask, so I am forced to like him (HI).
Vy 73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Getting
I can do a sked :)
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Serocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
{snipped}
TRY to find someone on any rant on a digital mode.
{end snip}
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
I thought you said, Kill all the lawyers, guess that does not
include the ARRL legal staff..
Prohibitions are fairly simple; and no, that is not the same
as permissions :)
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
{snipped
To be argumentative, this quote was from the play Henry VI, believe
Dick the Butcher made it. He also wanted to execute all those that
could read or write. Shakespeare apprenticed for a law firm and do
not think he would wish for my family to be deprived of income thru
death :)
Also doubt
Hi Bonnie,
Thanks for initiating this discussion:
Throw the prospect of incremental frequency shift keying into the mix
for discussion; know a few are working on this mode(s)also.
The OFDM (AM-QPSK)+6dB better SNR may or may not be an issue...it
depends on usagethe usual HF near LUF
Well, was on the internet very early...mostly only .edu and .mil
domains back thenhence I listened and tuned around alot on the
radio :)
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Warriner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What did Ham Radio do before the Internet E-Mail?
Hi Andy,
I have not tried it (even on VHF); but curious as to why it is not
legal. Is it speed and/or bandwidth?
Thanks in advance,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder to the USA based hams , this mode is not considered
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:37 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re:
RFSM2400/MIL-STD-188-110
Hi Andy,
I have not tried it (even on VHF); but curious
as to why it is not
legal
I do not believe so, they use MIL-STD-188-141A
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't the HF-LINK folks been using this mode for over 5 years?
John. K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Bonnie,
Excuse me for being dense (is what I do best)...is the difference in
this discussion MIL-STD-188/110 versus MIL-STD-188/141A ?
I know the /xxx takes precidence; as do all slash sheets.
But am missing the point (I should read the MIL specs, but have to do
that everyday at work so
Doubt you or Rick are missing anything.
300 baud ax.25 packet works poorly on HF unless near the MUF. I still
like the mode but after 20+ years I agree to its shortcomings...
PAX/PAX2/ARQ FAE all work better at the expensive of
bandwidthax.25 packet at 110 baud works better too when down
Hi,
Not sure I see that anyone is trying to keep the 50 or so hams
from getting a message back to home. I really thought the number to
be much, much larger given it is the argument used for alot of
Winlink2000.
Is this the real crux of the discussion? If so, that is alot of RF
bandwidth per
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snipped...shows I had a bad day at work when I cannot type my call
correctly and then fail to proof-read]
73
Bill M9DSJ
Actually my ticket reads n9dsj
Well,
You are all correct... as usual it depends; in this case it depends on
mode, band and operating style.
If I were, for example, using the panoramic type operation to look for
a snap-shot of what was going on in cw, rtty or psk modes using
Multipsk, I would opt for a fairly wide open filter
I agree for just BPSK31 that Multipsk can be intimidating..but even I
sorted it out after abit of floundering about. As for ALE, it is
more a system than a modeARQ FAE is actually fairly simple
compared to PC-ALE and its counterparts. ARQ FAE might best be viewed
as a connected mode
Hi Andy,
Assume you mean DSP noise reduction...have never seen any real
effect
of note either way on digital modes...even on HELL. The noise blanker
degrades some WSJT modes but otherwise have seen little impact on
received digital decodes.
On Hell, at least Feld Hell, the AGC seems to
Hi Andy,
Well many cringe on hearing me, regardless of mode...at least ARQ FAE
is more narrow than the umpteen ssb signals that abound. Is
interesting conceptually.
Saw you on 80 also but condx between us seemed less than optimum...am
sure another night will bode better.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hi John,
Heard you, Andy, and VE3FWF but more like working WSJT modes due to
conditions which are horrid herelinked to W6JVE using ARQ FAE
later...worked ok but need to balance the mode with the conditions as
Jim in Arkansas is usually very strong here. Also I am worn out from a
2 hour
Hi Dan,
Here is a link to the MIL-STD-188-141A/ALE channels. The root webpage
gives alot of information as to what MIL-STD-188-141A/ALE is and does..
http://www.hflink.com/channels/
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, n0ziz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is 141a? What
Steve,
I noticed the same behaviour here using test versions 24_02_20 and
25_02_20; reverted back to 19_02_20.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Bad news as soon as MultiPSK 25-02 receives an ARQ FAE linking call
You, EA2AFR and KQ6XA were very solid here on all modes - also CO2JA
abit later...ice did a number on my antenna so was in monitor mode
only. Antenna is back up so will try 80 meters later...
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
EA2AFR
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
