did not offer
Domino EX11, so we didn't get to try that out.
It was obvious to us though that Domino EX8 fit our particular situation and
need very well. That was my first experience with any version of Domino mode,
and I was impressed.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your
I was using FLDIGI, the other station was using HamRadioDeluxe.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Claudio
To: digitalradio
I'm sure everybody believes you, John. Try to calm down if you can.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio
/Paxon and
AltCast, but not as often as I use the MixW and FLDIGI.
All are great programs - for what they do.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message
this tell you about WinLink?
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
John, what I am 'badmouthing' is illegal and rude operating habits.
I personally doubt that the WinLink group will ever clean up their act - but if
they were to do so, I would be among the first to congratulate and praise them,
you can count on that.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer
Not making a lot of sense there, John.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent
that it is not developed further or used for any other purpose by anyone
else. When they decide to kill it, they will want it to stay dead. - Just as
dead as SCAMP is today.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http
Dave:
If WinMore was in the public domain, you might have a point there. When the
WinLink group deep-sixes their proprietary software, then who can use it?
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http
which does the same thing with a live operator on each end and as close to zero
instances of harmful interference as is humanly possible?
This is something that we should all be thinking about. - The number of ruined
QSOs that the FCC thinks is OK is zero.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer
Soundcard software users: Try turning on your notch filter and slowly steering
the notch around the waterfall. It's great for covering up splattery or
adjacent signals.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org
Sure, there's an alternative!
- How about operating in compliance with PART97, which prohibits harmful
interference?
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
Personally, I don't think
Bonnie:
I have not spread any disinformation about ALE anywhere.
Take your personal attacks elsewhere. You bore me.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message
window in RTTY mode and read the mail during the contests. Seeing how much fun
those guys have, I've decided that if I ever get into contesting, it will be in
RTTY mode first.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org
the speed of carrier detect, and work with all modes.
But don't hold your breath, it's not right around the corner.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
not saying that PC-ALE should not be used, just that it needs to be
impossible to set it up in auto-lid mode and walk away from the transmitter
with it operating that way for any appreciable amount of time.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop
switch. Works great.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:45 PM
Serial port switch link:
http://sewelldirect.com/serial-db9-manual-switch-4.asp
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
It's lid.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Ian Wade G3NRW
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 3:00 PM
at the appropriate frequency and do quite well.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
Howdy, George, and welcome to the digitalradio group! I think you'll like it
here, this is one of the best digital discussion groups I've run across. Nice
folks, and plenty of good information.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: AC5JV,GEORGE
Howdy, Josh
I intended to include the linik with the request for a review, but I
apparently forgot to do so!
The NBEMS article is at the USPacket website:
http://uspacket.org/network/index.php/topic,44.0.html
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio
I wrote an article today about NBEMS for my website... Would someone more
familiar with NBEMS look it over and make sure I got my facts straight, and
didn't anything important out?
Appreciate! - Comment here or in an eMail if you prefer.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio
the automatically controlled station occupies a
bandwidth of more
than 500 Hz.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio
Sent
There is a simple PTT schematic and a general description of soundcard
interfacing at USPacket.Org:
This article is about Flex32, but the first section is dedicated to soundcard
interface info:
http://uspacket.org/network/index.php/topic,21.0.html
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use
.
In the end, it's always best to keep your fellow hams in mind. All of them.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Bill V WA7NWP
To: digitalradio
better than Windows
for that. - It's most definately a learning experience, which is not so bad at
all.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Alan
-
From: Charles Brabham
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 13:20 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Why would anyone
From what I understand, we do not have an actual bandwidth limit on HF, but
we do have a practical one, based upon PART97
That sounds like fun! I've tried Feld Hell, MFSK16 and MT63, but not the other
two. - I'll make it a point to try them out this weekend.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
Rud:
Note that I didn't make an arguement, I asked a question.
By your arguement, Packet should be allowed to operate at 600 baud - but guess
what?
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http
on QRZed.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Moore
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:54 AM
Subject
-2.5 kHz wide.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:10 AM
to bandwidth, but we do have a number of
practical ones that should be easy to stay out of trouble with, as long as we
play well with others and follow the rules. ( PART97 and The Amateurs Code )
Otherwise - we are asking for trouble and will not like the result that follows.
73 DE Charles Brabham
with the current amount of
utilization around a given frequency, at a given time on a given day.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: Dave Sparks
realistically aspire to
do.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
- Original Message -
From: wb5aaa
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:25 PM
I am no expert on 10m band plans, but the frequencies you mentioned sound good
to me.
Unless somebody more knowlegable jumps in to say otherwise, I think you ought
to go ahead on the freqs you mentioned.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications
Doesn't PC ALE end up transmitting without listening? If so, it would not be
suitable for BBS use. We have to stick with the PART97 regs and good operating
procedure pretty closely.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio
Sent
That's really outstanding! Good work!
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http://www.hamradionet.org
http://www.arwatch.com/info/t_part97.htm
It's all spelled out in PART97 in 95.305 and 95.307.
On 6 meters, you can go up to 19.2 kb.
On 10 meters, you can go up to 1200 baud.
Below that, 300 baud is the limit.
Note that several HF digital modes try to evade the 300 baud limit on the low
PSK 63/250/1200).
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Charles Brabham
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] The most used software?
I use MixW the most. As farv as I know, none
I use MixW the most. As farv as I know, none of the others offer the virtual
KISS TNC emulation that lets you use the software with so many other programs.
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at
HamRadioNet.Org !
http
is to join the other 80%
of US hams who have stopped giving any money or support to Newington.
They sure don't give a hoot about you... In this kind if situation, the only
rational response is to reciprocate.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications
Howdy, Andy!
The goal is to get the highest quality audio possible into your microphone, at
a reasonable volume level.
I'd try a volume level between 1/2 and 3/4 , and place the microphone about 3-6
inches away from the speaker, depending upon how loud it sounds as a starting
point, and how
This is interesting in light of all the claims by WinLink and ALE aficianados
that that comprehensive signal-detection is 'impossible'.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: Ed Hekman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:30 AM
Subject:
All of the 30m HF Packet BBS stations are network stations that only accept
connections from other forwarding BBS's.
The place set aside for HF user access to the network is on 14.105 MHz LSB. -
Unfortunately there is a good deal of harmful interference there from WinLink
stations that
That would be best of all, to have a write-up in QST.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
Hello, Tony!
The advantage you mention for ARQ modes is in fact their primary drawback in
the environment we inhabit as amateur radio operators, which is shared
spectrum.
In commercial or government channelized spectrum, ARQ does in fact have some
edge.
Our amateur radio HF spectrum
AEC Montgomery County, TX
http://TheHamNetwork.net
-Original Message-
From: Charles Brabham [mailto:n5...@uspacket.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:24 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] The ARQ Advantage?
Hello, Tony
I got my Asus netbook at Radio Shack, it runs Ham Radio Deluxe for rig control.
Works great!
I use CAT5 network cable for all the desktops here, but put in a WIFI access
point for the little netbook.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
automatic.
Most of the disparaging talk about HF Packet is motivated by politics, and does
not come from actual knowledge. If you talk to the PC types who disparage
Packet, it turns out that very few of them have any recent experience with the
mode, they're still stuck in the 1980's.
Charles Brabham
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: another can you ID this mode request
Howdy, Tony!
There are two advantages that HF Packet has over other modes, one being that
it
A Phil pointed out, the only real fix is on the TX end - the transmitting
station should be putting out a clean signal. Universal distribution of the
following info will help there.
Clean PSK signal:
Turn your power control to full power, Mic gain in its normal position for
SSB phone use, and
Howdy, Dave!
The closest thing to a website for Q15x25 is a Yahoo! egroup. The address is:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/?yguid=203716760
If you go back through the posts there, you'll learn a lot about Q15x25. It's
outstanding feature is that it is AX25, which means lots of
and utilize the Pskmail network? - Yes, most definately!
Is it smart to dis and ignore the SkipNet which is faster, serves many more
locations and is more spectrally efficient? - I'll leave that for the reader to
consider.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Group members will have to forgive a few members here who appear to harbor some
personal hostility regarding the SkipNets, and Packet radio in general. To find
out more about the SkipNets without getting flames stirred up here, please
contact me off-list for details.
As it stands today, the
What you describe can be done but it would be a step back, not forward from
Packet networking as we know it. - This assumes that you are talking about a
network that covers a significant area and has a good number of users in it.
Your idea would be most advantageous with a small number of users
Most HF Packet is LSB as well.
General statements will often get you into trouble, unless very well researched.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 6:56 PM
Subject: Re:
typing, my vision is not good today and I'm a hunt 'n peck typist.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: How Can We Push HF Emcomm
How about something like the single-band PSK31 tranceiver kits, but on VHF
instead of HF?
Something like this for a C-note or so would give NBEMS the kickoff it needs,
and there would be dozens of other useful applications for a kit radio like
that. - The satellite guys, the VHF CW enthusiasts
That reminds me of a concept where SSTV would be utilized in a backward
fashion.. The image sent would be used to modulate the signal, as usual. The
difference is that data is in the image, but in order to get it, you have to
actually listen to the audio from the signal. Looking at the image
The article mentions WinLink developer Rick Muething.
Rick Muething installed the WinLink HF and VHF stuff in our area.
That was when we first noticed the new packet node with no callsign and the
alias OFF. - Illegal as you can get.
The OFF node cleverly screws up TheNet nodes so that the
actually better out there, the HF digital network would
already be using it and AX25 Packet would only be found on the VHF/UHF bands.
But there isn't, so...
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Jose A. Amador
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles,
What happened with Q15X25 ?? It looks promising, especially on VHF.
Can you fill us in on how it worked or didn't work?
Howard K5HB
You hit the nail on the head, Howard, about Q15x25 being especially
, just for fun:
http://n5pvl.rgvham.com/stxbbs/screen.htm
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Dell sells new dual-core PC's in your choice of Vista, XP, Ubuntu Linux or
DOS. - Yes, I said DOS.
Mine works just fine, no problems.
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
I recently bought a new TS2000. Is there much HF packet activity? I haven't
heard any on HF in Iowa. Thanks
W0pd
On HF, 14.105 LSB is the most popular frequency, but there is also activity
on the digital part of 40 meters.
The autoforwarding BBS networks you may run across cannot allow
to crash other hams' QSO's. We operate according to PART97
and The Amateur's Code.
- When we are not having our QSO crashed by a mindless PACTOR Lid, that
is...
Stop by at WinLink-Watch to see the pics. -
http://www.arwatch.com/watch/w_winlink.htm
73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
[EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Licensing of Pactor modes
snip
Actually, the only outfit they licensed it to was one American company
the name of which escapes me.
It was Pac-Com. - I had one of those early units.
- Original Message -
From: Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FCC: Petition to Kill Digital Advancement
I probably should not get involved but here's a classic example of why
I tried it out, but had trouble with the audio not driving the waterfall
display sufficiently to function.
When I pull the CD and boot up in Win98se again, Digipan and MixW work fine,
as always.
Everything else on the LiveCD worked fine, but was useless without a
fuctional waterfall display.
What was it that caused Packet networks in the United States to decline over
the course of a decade that saw astounding growth and advancement of the
Packet network in Europe? ( 19.2 access, 78.2 fulldup backbone )
Was it - the internet? - Well, yes and no. Remember that Europeans had
Well, he has a very good point that perhaps you should consider.
Using more bandwidth than you need to communicate is worse than using too
much power.
73,
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent
My personal favorite for home VHF/UHF Packet is Flex32 with the excellent
PAXON terminal.
There are step-by-step tutorials for both of these programs at USPacket.Org,
featuring a screen shots for each step involved in installation and setup.
These tutorials are very popular, I had to purchase
a little extra effort
because it is a great system.
http://www.w1hkj.com/emcpup.html
73,
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
USPacket
74 matches
Mail list logo
