with a local mentor that can help guide you through
the ins and out of getting up and running on APRS.
73,
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
Bend, Oregon
- Original Message - From: Dan Walker
Thank you, seems so complicated! very limited funds. Will try to get it
setup with your help
Please explain your comment! It's the first I've ever heard of PV systems
being RF noisey - this could be a major problem with the push for green
technologies!
73,
Jeff -- KE7ACY
CN94
- Original Message - From: Juergen
Don't forget the photovoltaic systems which are becoming
It's NOT an attachment - it's an embedded link.
It looks pretty nasty too!
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: mikea
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] World's nastiest PSK31 signal
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at
What do you have against Paypal?
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message - From: Ted Bear
Hello Digital Guru's..
,
I am just getting interested in building a SDR. I checked the web pages and
there seem to be lots of info on kits
like the SoftRock ..? But as I read on.. it seems these
The definition given although likely accurate is not relevent to the discussion
because it's NOT the definition used by the FCC.
Although none of us (US hams) are going to be deported to Siberia (unless
there's some sort of agreement between the US and USSR that I'm not aware of),
we CAN be
A smart man picks his fights carefully. Comparing this discussion to the fight
for our freedom is absurd.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message - From: AA0OI
Julian:
I apologize for my county men,, forgive them for they know not what they ARE
TALKING about.
If they would all
Yes! If you're a psychotic jerk and you want to flood the cluster with
unnecessary unwanted traffic.
- Original Message - From: Siegfried Jackstien
[snip]
If there is no page is there still a reason to send spots?
sigi
What are you basing that statement on??The Hamspots page? You need to take
a look at the left column - see the red squares? That indicates that the spot
was auto-generated by the ROS software -- BOGUS spots! The real spots are
the ones w/o the red square - I didn't see more than a
Given the author's animosity toward certain hams, the fact that he stated he
was doing a persona non grata list, the fact that he DID do a list, and his
propensity to be untruthful in general, I would be VERY hesitant to install his
software on my computer! Even more so if I was on his list!
What happened?
2 days without a single message! Is something broke?
Jeff -- KE7ACY
IIRC, KISS mode should be used completely under software control. IOW, the
software puts the TNC into KISS mode and takes it out of KISS mode. KISS mode
is not really for manual operation, the software you use in KISS mode
determines what the TNC does and how it does it.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
With What?
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
- Original Message - From: Alan Wilson To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
I agree completely..73, Alan
packet at all AFAICR.
Keep your TNC in case you want to run Airmail, but also setup a soundcard
interface to use the NBEMS software and modes.
Also, you might want to look at the Paclink software which will work better
with your TNC than Airmail will.
73,
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
DCARES - Deschutes
You'd probably have better luck contacting the rocketeers that fly off the
Playa. They're there more often, a significant percentage are hams, and
they're likely to have their ham gear with them while they're on the playa.
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
BORG - Bend Oregon Rocketry Group
Sorry Frank!
I'm not particularly interested in another Portland radio club whose meetings I
can't attend.
Thanks anyway!
Jeff M KE7ACY
CN94
- Original Message -
From: Tooner
Live in Oregon? Come see me.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DARCO
f, k2ncc
$1000 modems are not going to be viable! Not if you want widespread usage.
Stick with open-source non-hardware based solutions.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: Jose A. Amador
[snip]
Even when the soundcard seems the way to go, I would not discard a
priori a hardware
By your own admission, most psk qso's are short. In addition, the band can
change rapidly, so most of us want to get that report in at the beginning,
because you may not get a chance otherwise.
I agree that a generic report of 599 for everyone doesn't do any good. I try
to give accurate
From the info you provided, it's kinda hard to tell exactly what it is you
want to do.
Do you want to try 2m packet? HF packet? Satellite Packet?
Who you are and where you are would be helpful also.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
CN94ib
- Original Message -
From: wizhippo
I love digital
that should be included in your Emcomm tool bag along with
Airmail2000, NBEMS, PCALE, etc.
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
DCARES - Deschutes County ARES
Bend, Oregon
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
I wonder if my laziness accidentally had me stumble in to an issue
relevant to the use
That particular site is a paid-for subscription site.
Andy -- you can always host the wiki yourself (or on a volunteered site).
free full access should be the norm with donations accepted to help support it.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
Hi Andy,
Keep in mind that this is all 3rd part hearsay -- supposedly Kantronics
implementation of Pactor I was by agreement with SCS and the part of that
agreement that would have given Kantronics access to Pactor II and Pactor III
was reneged on by SCS.
I don't know if the agreement was legally
Actually, I suspect that it will be nearly impossible to do. Given the number
of systems that can't be upgraded without all new hardware (not everybody is
going to go for that).
Thx for the headsup on that!
Jeff M -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: Phillip
Hi Jeff,
AFAIK, the current release version of WSPR does NOT have the QSO capability in
it. What the message was apparently about was the first successful WSPR QSO
using a beta version of the software with that capability.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: Paul
I'm puzzled. When
Perfect! Just as the US is moving back to AX.25 packet technology for Emcomm
purposes, people are planning on shutting down and making wholesale changes
to the AX.25 protocol. Brilliant!
Hopefully, it will only affect the VK crowd.
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
ARES
- Original Message
It's called Video ID and if you can see the waterfall you can read it. It blew
me away the first time I saw it, I thought I was seeing things.
Jeff M -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: Paul
I think I missed the memo on how to ...display that code as text...
Are you suggesting
WSPR is a propogation testing mode. It stands for Weak Signal Propogation
Reporting and is based on MEPT_JT (Manned Experimental Propogation Testing by
Joe Taylor). WSPR.exe is the program used and the object is to use the lowest
power setting you can get away with and to transmit a 2 minute
Rick,
My interests are similar to yours, ie, effective emergency comms, and just
trying out all the different modes.
I have two main issues: 1. Being brand new to digital modes, I find it rather
difficult to tell what mode I'm seeing on the waterfall. I recognize PSK,
RTTY, MFSK16 (now),
are correct.
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: Howard Brown
NT 3.1 and 3.5 was based on OS/2.
- Original Message
From: Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NT's background is OpenVMS.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
The freq varies slightly by temp, currently they're recommending 101463 LSB
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
Bend, Oregon
- Original Message -
From: Master Ice
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Balloon Launch from North America
bandwidth issues associated with the WL2K system.
Is this as big an issue as it appears to be?
I'm personally more concerned with the expensive proprietary nature of the
Pactor modes and the standardization on it by the WL2K proponents.
Any comments??
Jeff Moore
KE7ACY
Deschutes County ARES
Bend
30 matches
Mail list logo
