Appears to me a sarcastic comment reflecting that they are selling and
repackaging all their very old, DOS based software products, nothing
obviously new, for quite a lot of money. I would have liked to see some new
software, as well, for the high cost.
Michael K3MH
_
From:
John Alan,
First, I have to congratulate you on venturing into digital modes. I cannot
tell you how many older hams scoff at the newer digital modes as if they
were nothing but teenage fads. I started in 1972 and I also started with a
Kenwood TS-520S and an SB-220 (my third rig, the first
will have more scientific suggestions,
Michael K3MH
Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Owner and Medical Director
Rehabilitation Options of Issaquah
1495 NW Gilman Blvd Suite 4, Issaquah, WA, 98027
Team approach to treatment of back and neck pain, sports
I had a 465 for years, great scope, loved it. Had some issues with the
transformer and the display, but was a work-horse. It is not an expensive
scope.
I later upgraded to a Tek 485 which has a lot higher speed and can be had
for around $200 - $275 on e-bay, which is where I bought mine.
Has anyone figured out how to program the Icom IC-91AD without the software?
I've made a programming cable since the outfit I ordered the cable/sw
through is way back-ordered.
I've read about the d-starcom software on the forums. What do those of
you who've made your own cable, do for
I'd like to load my IC-91AD with scanner freq's and have made a programming
cable as the outfit I ordered the ICOM cable sw package through is very
back-ordered and I'd like to get started.
I've read that many people make their own cables, but what do they do for
software? Are there
I am fairly naïve to this situation, but have been a ham for the last 35
years. I wonder, which narrow band modes do you refer to for use in a dire
emergency?
CW? How many CW ops do you think there will be left in 50 years, or even 10
years? And, if you are 500 miles out at sea, and need to
For what it is worth, this is what I typed in my response to this
proceeding. We should be focusing on finding ways to encourage more use of
this spectrum, lest we lose it. With the elimination in the licensing
requirement for CW, how crowded do we really think the bottom ends of the
band will
Hatzakis Jr MD wrote:
For what it is worth, this is what I typed in my response to this
proceeding. We should be focusing on finding ways to encourage more
use of this spectrum, lest we lose it. With the elimination in the
licensing requirement for CW, how crowded do we really think
It is even possible for a deaf person to communicate with a blind person
I have had a few patients with severe motor strokes but with preserved
cognitive functioning use Morse code as the only means of communication with
the world.
My opinion is that it is hard for me to believe that
I have to agree. I never thought of the US government as the yardstick to
measure appropriate behavior. In fact, it has been the Amateur community
over the last 10o years that has helped the FCC drive policy and technology
adoption and this is, partly, why we enjoy so much spectrum and as much
I have an Icom IC-910H and want to hook up to a Kantronics Kam XL. I know
there are the ACC sockets and the Data(1) Main-band and Data(2) Sub-band
connections.
If I am using the top display in Sat mode when using SatPC32 and to connect
to ISS and I have the ACC socket to connect to the TNC,
It is an industry that creates it own demand and, thereby, supply. MH
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of list email filter
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 11:33 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: USA: No
13 matches
Mail list logo
