I recommend that they move even higher in the 140-150 segment, PSK runs
around 141 to 143, RTTY 142 to 145 so I guess if they want to be nice
they could even move higher, what caused them to move down the band?
Ron W4LDE
Sholto Fisher wrote:
Hi all,
I am in communication with Ev, W2EV with
Ron,
I asked Ev the same question and his reply was:
Hi Sholto,
During DXpeditions, it seems that split frequency
operators were telling people to listen in the same
segment that PropNET was operating within.
Trying to be good band co-occupants, we studied DX
spots and determined
Warning:
DXpeditions have a lifetime of average 1 week, they send there 'clients'
where they find a quiet spot. The next one will find you.
73,
Rein EA/PA0R/P
Hi Sholto,
During DXpeditions, it seems that split frequency
operators were telling people to listen in the same
segment
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PropNet and JT65 frequencies
I recommend that they move even higher in the 140-150 segment, PSK runs
around 141 to 143, RTTY 142 to 145 so I guess if they want to be nice
they could even move higher, what caused them to move down the band?
Ron W4LDE
Sholto
That would probably QRM the HF APRS channel, which is around 10.1495 (10.1515
LSB, 2100-2300 Hz AF).
Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to do any kind of frequency coordination
on 30m. It's been my experience that there isn't one single Hz of bandwidth
that is not occupied by CW, gigawatt
How about moving the JT65 stations, the freq was simply one suggested
by Bonnie, nothing cast in stone.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Joe Veldhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would probably QRM the HF APRS channel, which is around 10.1495
(10.1515 LSB, 2100-2300 Hz AF).
Andy,
I am ok with this idea too but we have to start somewhere.
Ev is being extremely cooperative in looking for a solution/compromise
and I have posted a message to the WSJT group asking for their help too.
But I am seeing most JT65 and JT2 etc still using the 10.139 frequency
so thought
