Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2008-01-05 Thread Jose A. Amador
OK, Bruce. Rereading my post, maybe I forgot to emphasize that one size does not fit all. I am not against development at all, actually, I try to follow it as closely as affordable, but discarding what works in favor of newer, more fashionable is somehow singing in the same tune of the

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-28 Thread Jose A. Amador
It is amazing that the developists in highly developed places forgets that the world is far from being equally developed and connected, with high speed digital repeater networks, easily accessible Internet, etc, etc... Even more, that you don't have to go to Asia, Africa or anywhere in the

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-28 Thread bruce mallon
Yep you shure had that right ! --- Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is amazing that the developists in highly developed places forgets that the world is far from being equally developed and connected, with high speed digital repeater networks, easily accessible Internet, etc,

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread F.R. Ashley
: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition I do a lot of KB2KB QSO on all 3 pactor modes. I have never been QRM'ed by another pactor station to the point that I could not go on with the QSO. But I have been QRM'ed by other modes. reason, I think is the other guy thinks it's a robot

RE: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread Rud Merriam
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W2XJ Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:53 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition I think the whole thing is pointless. Why to I want to try to send email via a slow speed

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread W2XJ
ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX http://TheHamNetwork.net -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W2XJ Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:53 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread AA0OI
like it !! (if you haven't) http://www.kc1cs.com/digi.htm Garrett / AA0OI - Original Message From: Rud Merriam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:02:28 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition You

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread W2XJ
True, but it also depends on what the emergency is. Since you are in a rural area you most likely have completely different needs. There are many different modes possible. I think it is important to remember that this thread started with discussion of automated robotic systems that transmit

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 05:17 PM 12/26/2007, you wrote: True, but it also depends on what the emergency is. Since you are in a rural area you most likely have completely different needs. There are many different modes possible. I think it is important to remember that this thread started with discussion of

Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition

2007-12-26 Thread W2XJ
PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Questions on digital opposition I see the point about document transfer, but wouldn't higher speed modes at higher frequencies be more efficient? For situations where infrastructure is in place, wouldn't a well planned DSTAR