Danny,
It depends upon the politics of the country. As a farmer, and one who
follows this kind of thing fairly closely, it is clear to me that there
is currently enough food to go around although there is going to come a
time where we simply can not support the world population which is
John K8OCL wrote:
The ARRL HSMM Working Group recommended at least the same
bandwidth for HF digital research and advancement as the
current ARRL bandplan recommended for a old legacy mode
such as AM.
Hi John,
There is really no sensible reason that AM should get special
treatment in a
OK let me chime in as a long time 6 meters user ...
FIRST .. NO ONE OBJECTS TO DIGITAL MODES .
In fact they do have a place in this hobby however the
problem as we see it is the tiying up of large amounts
of space ( 200 ver 3 kHz ) on bands that ARE widely
used and do cross borders.
At 10:05 PM 10/15/2006, you wrote:
I know some have asked for chunks that way, but at the same time for chunks
with larger signal bandwidth. What I am concerned about is some 3 kc signal
getting on top of us when we are using cw or psk or some other narrower
signal, and wiping us out. Already
Bonnie,
Agree completely. It makes little sense to give AM such special treatment
at the
expense of shutting down future digital technical developments on HF.
Power masking! Very interesting approach to a solution for the dilemma.
The HSMM WG still has one final report to submit by the EOY.
Last weekend, or was it the one before, during a RTTY contest, I heard them
as low as 14.055 , and smack dab inside the PSK portion around 14.060
upward. When there are contests every other weekend of one kind or the
other, that doesnt leave many free weekends for those who still have jobs
during
It may be that the FCC is preparing hams for voice meaning any human
voice equivalent including digital or analog. My view is that some modes
don't play very well together, but when it comes to wide band digital
modes, we are now at the point that all kinds of content can be inside a
digital
Andy,
Need the CONVER file I sent you for WinDRM.
Thanks,
Tony KT2Q
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan
What can I say to please you?
But just like RTTY - PSK has no God given right
to that part of the band either. But like I said below
(in red this time). Seems you missed it before.
At 01:57 PM 10/16/2006, you wrote:
Last weekend, or was it the one
before, during a RTTY contest, I heard them
Well John, I am not asking YOU to please me, just
the FCC which might be as tuff. HI.
None of them are a God given right. It just
seems to me, when there are common internationalareas on a band, on which
have become used by a particular mode, the FCC would be nuts to suddenly tell us
we
In a sense, the FCC has hoist digital users on their own petard. With
PSK-31 being so popular, the need for lots of space is questionable.
Likewise, the competition for space is not as great with the most
narrow modes, i.e. less qrm. In order to show the FCC more space is
needed, digital folks
11 matches
Mail list logo
