Moderator : Re: [digitalradio] Re: Beacon's ?

2008-01-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Please refrain from generalized statements about professions that one does not like. They can be construed as personal attacks. Andy K3UK On Jan 6, 2008 1:57 AM, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Andreas Rehberg
Skip, you don't really mean that! Any witches to burn.. thieves to cut the hands off.. I'll go now and monitor the bands.. woe betide I find a NBEMS signal that interferes another signal.. Andy, DF4WC Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:50:52 -0500 Von: kh6ty

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread kh6ty
Andy, It is an honest attempt to work together to resolve a continuing problem. WG3G has been off the air for months, I believe, so the question is why is his transmitter automatically trying to connect with WG3G. I'll bet he doesn't even know it. Wouldn't you like to know? WG3G is in Trinidad

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Sholto Fisher
It is getting a bit crazy on 30m. I have been seeing a lot of Winlink QRM lately. If anyone doubts this, put your receiver on 10.140 USB and watch the PSK31 QSOs for a while. You can guarantee you won't have to wait very long before some Pactor station Winlink server switch to Pactor-3 and cover

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Rick wrote: I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting right over our

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Jack Chomley
At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting right

[digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hello Jack, In MultiPSK, the RS ID provides this function...automatically changes mode and frequency also, when implemented. Not sure of any other software that uses this function but it works very well and can decode mode and center frequency fairly deep into the noise. 73, Bill --- In

[digitalradio] Mode identification

2008-01-06 Thread Jose A. Amador
Yes, but the RS ID signal has to be transmitted. I believe that Jack refers to some thing like a function PK-232's had to analyze and identify the mode. Something could be done using MultiPSK Analysis function. But for an example, today I attempted to decode a signal tha APPARENTLY was PSK250

[digitalradio] Re: Mode identification

2008-01-06 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Understood; RS ID tells the other station the mode and frequency. I think you are correct in that analysis of a signal is difficult. Some modes are very easy to recognize by ear (Throb, for example), others are much more difficult. One I had trouble with the other day, was Clover, but had not

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread David
Jack Chomley wrote: At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 around 10137. A Pactor station

[digitalradio] Updated NBEMS files avialble

2008-01-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
http://w1hkj.com/NBEMS/

[digitalradio] DXKeeper APP_DXKEEPER_SUBMODE field

2008-01-06 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Dave, Patrick, the newest version of DXKeeper provides a sub-mode field; it'd be nice if MultiPSK would log things like the Olivia tone constellation there: APP_DXKEEPER_SUBMODE. Perhaps Simon and I can convince the ADIF development community to make this a standard field. Yes it would

RE: [digitalradio] DXKeeper APP_DXKEEPER_SUBMODE field

2008-01-06 Thread Dave AA6YQ
There's no rule proposed, Patrick; I think of it as a mode-specific comment. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 4:54 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com

[digitalradio] Re: Mode identification

2008-01-06 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One I had trouble with the other day, was Clover, but had not heard it in so long I had forgotten what it sounded like. You heard a Clover signal?! What kind of time machine do you have there? Heard any spark

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Dave AA6YQ
IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Chomley Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread David
Dave AA6YQ wrote: IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- *From:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Jack Chomley

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Jack Chomley
At 08:33 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: Hi Dave CW id is not universally understood..i for one have a hearing problem and CW is very difficult for me to hear let alone decode...also what about those who are deaf...we do have a number of them around the world... most are now using digital

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Dave AA6YQ
In my experience, most users of digital modes beyond RTTY and PSK-31 stay up-to-date with whatever software they are using because 1. they need the defect repairs 2. they want the new features and modes Using CW (or any other universal mode) for identification does not require registration or

[digitalradio] 160M PSK activity?

2008-01-06 Thread Gary - N3JPU
Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on 160M? Gary Mitchelson N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19 http://www.mitchelson.org/

Re: [digitalradio] 160M PSK activity?

2008-01-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
There was some last night on 1807-1810 On Jan 6, 2008 6:26 PM, Gary - N3JPU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on 160M? Gary Mitchelson N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19 http://www.mitchelson.org/ -- Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Chuck Mayfield
Try: http://www.w1khj.com/NBEMS CHUCK AA5J At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: Hello Haward, Happy New Year! Sorry, http://www.w1khj/NBEMShttp://www.w1khj/NBEMS is not a working link. Server not found Firefox can't find the server at www.w1khj.com 73! Sunday, January 06, 2008, 19:50:52,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread kh6ty
Should be http://www.w1hkj.com/NBEMS. The k and h were transposed. Skip KH6TY - Original Message - From: Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 6:38 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M Try:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Chuck Mayfield
Yes, Skip. My bad. You are correct except for the . at the end of the link vbg Sorry for the qrm... that is little QRM, like psk31 is 73 Chuck AA5J At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: Hello Haward, Happy New Year! Sorry,

[digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

2008-01-06 Thread Dave Bernstein
My attempt at installation failed with NOTE: Now spawning the main Setup program 'Setup1.exe' *** ERROR: Cannot start main setup program! (CreateProcess() returned error code 0x0005H) Did you customize Setup1? Suggestions? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In

[digitalradio] Clarification on Winlink

2008-01-06 Thread Rick
Winlink was a system that used MBOs (Mail Box Operations) around the world that you could connect to with Pactor and Clover II, to send mail to other hams. It was also tied in to the VHF packet structure at one time. The owners then developed an internet based system called Winlink 2000, which

[digitalradio] Re: Mode identification

2008-01-06 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Yes. A radio. No re sparkI even hear CW from time to time! 73, Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin bmc@ wrote: One I had trouble with the other day, was Clover, but had not heard

[digitalradio] ANNOUNCE: PocketDigi 1.0.11 released

2008-01-06 Thread Vojtěch Bubník
Hi gang. I released PocketDigi 1.0.11 at http://pocketdigi.sourceforge.net. There are following new features implemented: RSID, PSK63F, PSK125, sampling rate conversion, tx delay/tx tail/ats3 preamble/postamble settings, keyboard accelerators, Handheld PC 2000 improvements, Waterfall FFT

[digitalradio] NBEMS experience today

2008-01-06 Thread Rick
Several of us were around the 10137 frequency earlier today and tried various combinations of modes, including NBEMS. We had at least KH6TY, K3UK, VE5MU, KC7GNM, and WD4KPD. Some attempts at making transfers was done. I sent Skip one of my standard messages which is the Gettysburgh Address. It

Re: [digitalradio] A weekend of NBEMS: Some questions.

2008-01-06 Thread kh6ty
1. Did anyone use it on VHF or UHF this weekend ? It seems that it would be perfect for these quiet frequency ranges, file transfers at PSK250 should really be very useful It is designed primarily for VHF in the choice of modes, narrow bandwidth and not handling much QSB so no need for

[digitalradio] I'm a new guy

2008-01-06 Thread Curt Givens
Well at least relatively new. I've been a general since last February, but was operating HF as an Army MARS operator for about 2 years before my upgrade. I signed up here because I've discovered I have a bunch I want to learn about digital modes. I hope this is the right place. My experience so