It appears that there has been no change to the peer to peer support in
the RMSpacket. I know that when I brought this up a few years ago, the
programmer was adamant that they not have peer to peer support in
Telpacs because it was strictly designed to be a simple internet telnet
to packet
In ALL cases, we must not lose sight of the fact that you must always
have phone (voice) communications available in emergencies. Digital data
plays a much smaller secondary role. To show you how absurd it can get,
in our Section we have Digital Communications Coordinator who actually
Skip,
I haven't seen any NBEMS postings yet. When the new mode is released I'll
add it to DM780.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
--
From: kh6ty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In addition, although we are improving NBEMS support on HF with a new
static-robust mode
Couple questions/thoughts on your comments, Jeff,
One of my main concerns about the local design of Winlink 2000 was that
all stations would lose their connectivity to each other as well as the
internet since the developer wanted to keep the Telpac (Telnet internet
to Packet RF) connection
Rick W. wrote:
Couple questions/thoughts on your comments, Jeff,
One of my main concerns about the local design of Winlink 2000 was that
all stations would lose their connectivity to each other as well as the
internet since the developer wanted to keep the Telpac (Telnet internet
to
