Just to clear up a few things:
1. Is it correct that just because a mode is listed in the NBEMS mode
list, does not mean that you could not use it with flarq as an ARQ mode?
Therefore, any of the modes could theoretically be used, even if not
recommended or even if they might not work very
1. Is it correct that just because a mode is listed in the NBEMS mode
list, does not mean that you could not use it with flarq as an ARQ mode?
Yes, but some modes cannot be used as an ARQ mode due to either too much
latency or ascii or control code support. The only modes tested with flarq
Hi all,
I would like to test one of these ARQ modes. Anyone around for a test on 40- or
80m? I am calling cq on 3585 usb in Thor right now.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
kh6ty wrote:
1. Is it correct that just because a mode is listed in the NBEMS mode
list, does not mean that you could not use
I note the new release of FL-Digi does not list PSK31 or 63 under
NBEMS modes. I realize that Dave , Skip, and others never really
intended NBEMS to have much use on HF , hence PSK250/125, but was
wondering why the option of slower PSK modes has been removed.
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:04:22 -0400, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I note the new release of FL-Digi does not list PSK31 or 63 under
NBEMS modes. I realize that Dave , Skip, and others never really
intended NBEMS to have much use on HF , hence PSK250/125, but was
wondering why the
I note the new release of FL-Digi does not list PSK31 or 63 under
NBEMS modes. I realize that Dave , Skip, and others never really
intended NBEMS to have much use on HF , hence PSK250/125, but was
wondering why the option of slower PSK modes has been removed.
Andy,
PSK31 and PSK63 are still
