Hi Demetre,
We are looking forward to your explanation as to how an unattended PMBO,
very near to a local station (and which local station, that the far away
client cannot even detect), and running a mode other than Pactor, will
refuse to transmit over the local station's QSO if queried by the
I am quoting here my reply to DAVE about his Anti-radiation missiles
tuned to PACTOR PMBO frequencies for your information!
That shows you exactly the attitude of some people against anything
they dislike and how they act. If the Pactor PMBOs activated any DCD
mechanism, people like Dave would sit
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kh6ty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Demetre,
We are looking forward to your explanation as to how an unattended
PMBO,
very near to a local station (and which local station, that the far
away
client cannot even detect), and running a mode other than
If you go to the SCS website, it clearly states that PACTORIII is
designed for commercial operation, especially maritime. They then have a
tanned rich German guy on the website giving a testimonial how the
system works from his yacht. If people want to tie up marine frequencies
with such a low
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kh6ty kh6ty@ wrote:
I am quoting here my reply to DAVE about his Anti-radiation missiles
tuned to PACTOR PMBO frequencies for your information!
snip
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kh6ty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am quoting here my reply to DAVE about his Anti-radiation missiles
tuned to PACTOR PMBO frequencies for your information!
snip
What about this Skip? Is this justified?
Of course it is not justified!
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you go to the SCS website, it clearly states that PACTORIII is
designed for commercial operation, especially maritime. They then
have a
tanned rich German guy on the website giving a testimonial how the
system works from
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you go to the SCS website, it clearly states that PACTORIII is
designed for commercial operation, especially maritime. They then
have a
tanned rich German guy on the website giving a testimonial
At 05:46 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
I am contemplating the purchase of an SCS TNC just to turn in the violators.
1. what are you going to do when you find a KB2KB QSO going on?
2. how are you going to know for *sure* that anyone is being QRM'ed ?
3. under FCC rules there is no such thing as a
at the top and
bottom for AM and CW.
73,
John
KD6ZOH
- Original Message -
From: W2XJ
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 23:46 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Your excellent petition
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
--- In digitalradio
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
At 05:46 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
I am contemplating the purchase of an SCS TNC just to turn in the
violators.
1. what are you going to do when you find a KB2KB QSO going on?
Be darned surprised. There are almost zero, goosegg, nada
keyboard-to-keyboard QSOs
At 07:28 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Be darned surprised. There are almost zero, goosegg, nada
keyboard-to-keyboard QSOs in Pactor. The mode is dead except for robots.
Yeah Roger you keep saying that yet I seem to find them all the time.
Have you given it a try?
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
At 07:28 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Be darned surprised. There are almost zero, goosegg, nada
keyboard-to-keyboard QSOs in Pactor. The mode is dead except for
robots.
Yeah Roger you keep saying that yet I seem to find them all the time.
Have you given it a
Here we go again. All it takes to bring out the flaming and shouting
matches is a controversial subject like this. I have nothing against
thoughtful, constructive discussion and differences of opinion, but do
we have to resort to this kind of stuff? Let's all act like grown-ups,
eh? It's not
14 matches
Mail list logo
