stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Aryeh Friedman
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread David Demelier
Just use -x switch portmaster -ad -x libreoffice 2013/3/25 Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon)

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Julien Cigar
On 03/25/2013 10:40, Aryeh Friedman wrote: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Leslie Jensen
2013-03-25 10:40, Aryeh Friedman skrev: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) -x avoid building or updating ports that match this pattern. Can be specified more than once.

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com writes: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) Your direct question was already answered, but note that libreoffice is not broken

Re: stupid portmaster question

2013-03-25 Thread Walter Hurry
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:53:00 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com writes: How do I tell portmaster -ad to ignore certain ports because they are broken such as editors/libreoffice is currently marked as (I am sure this will change soon) Your direct question

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread RW
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the -u -p flags with 'portmanger', it

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com articulated: On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the -u -p flags with 'portmanger',

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:22:55 -0500 Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote: I don't see anything that specifically states the the -R or -r flags are in included with the -a flag; although I might be misinterpreting it. If it was implied i think it should have been better documented. -aRr

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote: -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former. I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a package that isn't in the set of all installed packages. That sentence makes

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:50:21 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote: -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former. I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed packages with consistent dependecies isn't going

portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Fred
Hello, According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to everything in /usr/ports? Best regards, Fred ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote: Hello, According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to everything in /usr/ports? It applies to installed ports. A commonly used command to

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:31:11 +0100 Polytropon free...@edvax.de articulated: On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote: Hello, According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote: On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred f...@blakemfg.com wrote: Hello, According to man portmaster the -a option will Update all ports that need updating. Does this apply to only installed ports or to everything in /usr/ports? It applies to installed

Re: portmaster question

2010-11-07 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the -u -p flags with 'portmanger', it does accomplish its goal. Isn't portupgrade -a equivalent to -arR? I hope so, or I

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
Mel wrote: On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? ... If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*}

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
Matthew Seaman wrote: Mel wrote: On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? ... If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-28 Thread Sergey Kovalev
Matthew Seaman wrote: Mel wrote: On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-27 Thread Mel
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 03:35:07 Matthew Seaman wrote: B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? ... If you want options that only apply to specific ports, then you can use a construct like this: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/databases/mysql*}

ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-24 Thread B. Cook
Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information?

Re: ports-mgmt/portmaster question

2008-12-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
B. Cook wrote: Is there a way to pass make args (other than -m) for each port? For example if I use -m BUILD_STATIC=YES and -m BUILD_OPTIMIZED=YES for mysql50-server.. other than remembering that I did that.. is there someway to have portmaster read its portmaster.rc and get that information?

portmaster question

2008-04-02 Thread Terry Sposato
Hi, I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade of all of my installed ports with the following command: sudo portmaster -Rfda It quit out when failing to build the ImageMagick port which is fine,

Re: portmaster question

2008-04-02 Thread Eric
Terry Sposato wrote: Hi, I recently did a binary upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE and everything went smoothly. For good measure I decided to do an upgrade of all of my installed ports with the following command: sudo portmaster -Rfda It quit out when failing to build the

portmaster question

2007-10-25 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
hi, i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will use -x jdk so i can deal with it later. but when there are two or more of them that need special attention, i cant find a way to do it right, i tried -x A

Re: portmaster question

2007-10-25 Thread James
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:11 -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: hi, i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will use -x jdk so i can deal with it later. but when there are two or more of them that need

Re: portmaster question

2007-10-25 Thread RW
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:50:10 -0600 James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:11 -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: hi, i been using portmaster for a while when upgrading my ports, often times when there are some problems in certain ports, e.g. jdk, i will use -x jdk so i can