El día Sunday, November 02, 2008 a las 02:48:13AM +0300, Boris Samorodov
escribió:
Sven Aluoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried netinstall of stable and current. Both versions of the
installer dont have driver for my NIC.
How to get ethernet working?
lscpi on Debian Lenny:
David Naylor wrote:
Hi,
According to the Release Schedule for FreeBSD 7.1 it is a few months behind.
I know that FreeBSD 7.1 will not be released until it is working properly,
and bug free however I am wondering what the hold ups are.
If someone could take the time to answer me I would
From: David Naylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
According to the Release Schedule for FreeBSD 7.1 it is a few months behind.
I know that FreeBSD 7.1 will not be released until it is working properly,
and bug free however I am wondering what the hold ups are.
If someone could take the
On Sunday 02 November 2008 03:21:55 David Allen wrote:
My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
to use awk to generate a report.
I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
keep things simple, say I have A Very Long String that
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:42:53 +0100
Matthias Apitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El día Sunday, November 02, 2008 a las 02:48:13AM +0300, Boris
Samorodov escribió:
Seems that you may be interested at:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=343551+0+current/freebsd-current
Hi Boris
This link
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, David Naylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Naylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD 7.1 - Status
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, November 2, 2008, 2:47 AM
Hi,
According to the Release Schedule for FreeBSD 7.1 it is a
few months behind.
I
Hi, Dear admin
I want to submit a question to Mail list; I hope to get help in time. Thanks
BR
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
According to the Release Schedule for FreeBSD 7.1 it is a few months behind.
I know that FreeBSD 7.1 will not be released until it is working properly,
and bug free however I am wondering what the hold ups are.
If someone could take the time to answer me I would appreciate it.
Regards
-- Original Message --
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:39:23 -0400
From: matt donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: andrew clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: updating from 6.3 to 7, mirror problems
does your DNS support SV lookups they are actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Allen wrote:
On 11/1/08, Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
to use awk to generate a report.
I'm working with a large data
I left KDE after version 2 as it then seemed to
go in the wrong direction (more features / bloat?)
http://www.kde.org/screenshots/kde2shots.php
In fact, if 2.n would compile on 7.0 I'd have
another look.
Since then I've been quite a fan of XFCE but found
myself slowly but surely converting to
El día Sunday, November 02, 2008 a las 01:56:27PM +0100, Sven Aluoor escribió:
Hi Matthias
Thanks for the wikipage. I quote from there:
Atheros L1 FastEthernet
This one is second generation of L1 controller which is supposed to be
heavily modified by Atheros after acquiring Attansic.
Alex Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to submit a question to Mail list; I hope to get help in time.
Thanks
Never, ever send test emails to freebsd-questions. From the Handbook:
If you wish to test your ability to send to FreeBSD lists, send a test
message to freebsd-test. Please do not
Friday, October 31, 2008 11:24 PM
From:
Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they try to compete and fail. doesn't matter who did what first. today
windoze gui is way more usable than kde4.
this is the only thing i agree.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
A couple of things:
1. It's true -- many users require a gentler transition than simply
giving up the richness of MS Windows and moving to some spare,
no. they don't require transition at all. they will not learn, use
kde/gnome/whatever windoze-like thing then will get back to windoze.
Since then I've been quite a fan of XFCE but found
myself slowly but surely converting to minimalism
i.e. the least needed to get done what I need done!
On my desktop FreeBSD this amount to about 6 jobs and for those twm fits the
bill perfectly.
http://81.174.174.115/twm/twmrc.htm
i prefer
On Fri 2008-10-31 08:11:49 UTC+1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
localhost# /usr/sbin/freebsd-update --debug fetch
Looking up update1.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found.
Fetching public key from update1.FreeBSD.org...
fetch: http://update1.FreeBSD.org/6.3-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl:
the question should be Is KDE usable at all on any OS?
the answer is no, it's crappy imitation of windoze.
If someone needs windoze like soft, just buy windows vista.
For someone who need unix, FreeBSD is a good choice.
I have to quote some random shoutbox I§vre read a long time ago:
You have to realize that this is the question of every user's
individual needs. Some users, like for example yourself, like going
deep, using the shell for tasks from everyday life, some users are
more GUI-oriented and like somewhat more graphic approach to the same
tasks.
true. that's why
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:56:27PM +0100, Sven Aluoor wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:42:53 +0100
Matthias Apitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El día Sunday, November 02, 2008 a las 02:48:13AM +0300, Boris
Samorodov escribió:
Seems that you may be interested at:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:32:39 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to realize that this is the question of every user's
individual needs. Some users, like for example yourself, like going
deep, using the shell for tasks from everyday life, some users are
more
+current/freebsd-current
Hi Boris
This link reference to an empty document
Hm, it seems to be changed:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=343551+0+archive/2008/freebsd-current/20081102.freebsd-current
Anyway here it is:
-
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:48:45PM +0900, To [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:33:21AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:56:27PM +0100, Sven Aluoor wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 08:42:53 +0100
Matthias Apitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El d?a Sunday, November 02, 2008 a las 02:48:13AM +0300, Boris
Samorodov escribi?:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:16:38 +0100
Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:48:16AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
What would be the fastest way to do that sector by sector copy?
I'm using
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:37 AM, andrew clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri 2008-10-31 08:11:49 UTC+1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
localhost# /usr/sbin/freebsd-update --debug fetch
Looking up update1.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found.
Fetching public key from
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 12:40 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is KDE4 usable on FreeBSD?
Ok now that you have all let off steam about the off topic of desktop verses
What port names need to be installed to create a XFCE4 desktop environment?
I was looking for a mega port like kde3 has but could not identify one.
Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FBSD1 wrote:
What port names need to be installed to create a XFCE4 desktop
environment?
I was looking for a mega port like kde3 has but could not identify one.
Thanks in advance.
I'm going to rake a random guess: x11-wm/xfce4 ?
-BEGIN PGP
Hi,
For some reason, after running portupgrade databases/mysql51-server,
MySQL is brought down, but not restarted. It's not a huge issue, as I
just have to remember to run the rc.d script after upgrading, but I
was wondering if anyone else had seen this? portupgrade seems to work
fine
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:52:53AM -0500, Andrew Berry wrote:
For some reason, after running portupgrade databases/mysql51-server,
MySQL is brought down, but not restarted. It's not a huge issue, as I
just have to remember to run the rc.d script after upgrading, but I was
wondering if
In the last episode (Nov 03), Andrew Berry said:
For some reason, after running portupgrade databases/mysql51-server,
MySQL is brought down, but not restarted. It's not a huge issue, as I
just have to remember to run the rc.d script after upgrading, but I
was wondering if anyone else had seen
Having issues loading .ko modules. Gets the message ...(no debugging
symbols found).
However, attempt to load .kld succeeds and following that .ko also works
good. But soon after that, gets the follwoing message.
Ignoring packet error, continuing...
Reply contains invalid hex digit -49
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FBSD1 wrote:
What port names need to be installed to create a XFCE4 desktop
environment?
I was looking for a mega port like kde3 has but could not identify one.
Thanks in advance.
I'm going to rake a random guess: x11-wm/xfce4 ?
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:52:53AM -0500, Andrew Berry wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, after running portupgrade databases/mysql51-server,
MySQL is brought down, but not restarted. It's not a huge issue, as I
just have to remember to run the rc.d script after upgrading, but I was
wondering
joeb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FBSD1 wrote:
What port names need to be installed to create a XFCE4 desktop
environment?
I was looking for a mega port like kde3 has but could not identify one.
Thanks in advance.
I'm going to rake a random guess:
On Monday 03 November 2008 08:38:07 joeb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FBSD1 wrote:
What port names need to be installed to create a XFCE4 desktop
environment?
I was looking for a mega port like kde3 has but could not identify one.
Thanks in advance.
I'm going
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:50:26 +0200, Manolis Kiagias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not really a random guess, x11-wm/xfce4 is the metaport you need
to build for a working XFCE4 environment.
This provides you will the basic functionalities of XFCE 4. You
pointed out correctly that there are
38 matches
Mail list logo
