Re: [Gendergap] [Spam] Re: Sexualized environment on Commons

2014-08-01 Thread Jane Darnell
I totally agree, and no offense to the people who have contributed to help pages, but I find them very unhelpful and sometimes downright wrong. Sent from my iPad On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com I Still stand by hand holding...personal out weighs what we

[Gendergap] Invitation: Research Hackathon on August 6 and 7

2014-08-01 Thread Pine W
The Wikimedia Research Hackathon on August 6 and 7 takes place parallel to the general Wikimania Hackathon in London. Wikimania Hackathon information is available at https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hackathon Research Hackathon information is available at

[Gendergap] Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?

2014-08-01 Thread Carol Moore dc
http://freebeacon.com/issues/government-funded-study-why-is-wikipedia-sexist/ Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist? $202,000 to address 'gender bias' in world's biggest online encyclopedia BY: Elizabeth Harrington Coincidentally(?) even as we're trying to get the Task Force more

Re: [Gendergap] Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?

2014-08-01 Thread Sarah Stierch
This is amazing. That's a lot of money. Sarah On Aug 1, 2014 6:04 AM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote: http://freebeacon.com/issues/government-funded-study-why-is-wikipedia-sexist/ Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist? $202,000 to address ‘gender bias’ in world’s

[Gendergap] Re Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?

2014-08-01 Thread Kathleen McCook
It is my perspective that working through the processes on Wikipedia are too democratic for most academics. It is easier to get a grant and become the defacto expert than to be part of the conversation. What I went through last week trying to get support for the South African novel, October, by

Re: [Gendergap] Re Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?

2014-08-01 Thread Carol Moore dc
Good points below. Also, on the academic side I can see it is academics looking for grants. On the govt side, I have to wonder. After all, in Wikipedia people will fight to get articles NPOV the govt would like to see biased, like against govt surveillance and Iran, Russia, Palestinians and

Re: [Gendergap] Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?

2014-08-01 Thread Kerry Raymond
What data is there to support the claim that the majority of WP editors are young, white, child-free men. ? The 2011 editor survey https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_Survey_2011 shows the majority are male, but not exactly young (although I guess it depends what you mean by young) and

Re: [Gendergap] Sexualized environment on Commons

2014-08-01 Thread A. Mani
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote: Then I looked at this political poster image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Courageous_Cunts.jpg which leads to this site http://courageouscunts.com/ I think nobody has bothered to write much on the

Re: [Gendergap] Sexualized environment on Commons

2014-08-01 Thread Keilana
To briefly go back to what Sarah and Marie have said, I do find that in person hand-holding and social support are the most effective factors in getting women to stick around. I don't know how to translate that from the real-world environment I teach newbies in to the virtual environment of new