Frist AdaCamp in Berlin! :)
On 23 July 2014 00:16, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
First AdaCamp in India!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Valerie Aurora vale...@adainitiative.org
Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:11 PM
Subject: [Adacamp Alumni] Applications open for
On 7/22/2014 8:00 PM, Kerry Raymond wrote:
I think it's new-ness bias and a related content bias and a
popularity bias rather than primarily a gender bias. There's loads
of new work published all the time. Lots of it will not merit a
Wikipedia article, just as many novels by the male
On 7/23/2014 11:56 AM, Carol Moore dc wrote:
On 7/22/2014 8:00 PM, Kerry Raymond wrote:
I think it's new-ness bias and a related content bias and a
popularity bias rather than primarily a gender bias. There's loads
of new work published all the time. Lots of it will not merit a
Wikipedia
Ryan, thanks for bringing this up for discussion. I've put a lot of thought
into the series of photos this comes from over the years, and it's well
worth some discussion. I'd like to hear what others think about this. Here
is a link to the category for the larger collection; warning, there's lots
Personally, I don't think it's worth having a discussion here about the
merits of deleting these images. There's no chance in hell they are going
to be deleted from Commons. What I'm more interested in is the locker-room
nature of the discussions and how/if this can be addressed, as I think that
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Personally, I don't think it's worth having a discussion here about the
merits of deleting these images. There's no chance in hell they are going
to be deleted from Commons. What I'm more interested in is the
On 7/23/2014 5:10 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
Personally, I don't think it's worth having a discussion here about
the merits of deleting these images. There's no chance in hell they
are going to be deleted from Commons. What I'm more interested in is
the locker-room nature of the discussions and
I agree that offensiveness is in the eye of the beholder. And while there
may be all manner of very niche groups who find strange things
offensiveness, maybe some people object to seeing refrigerators or reading
about cakes, nonetheless we know that there are a lot of widespread
categories of
