something, and if so what and how, or is it
best to ignore?
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
something to the civility policy about sexual
innuendo. I think so long as it's low key we could manage that fairly
easily (famous last words).
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
served. The list will open on Wednesday, March 23 at
22:00 UTC, and will remain open for seven days. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CREDO
Feel free to add your name even if you're lower on the list than the
400th, in case people ahead of you aren't eligible.
Good luck!
Sarah
http
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 13:35, Sarah Stierch sa...@sarahstierch.com wrote:
Wow, the talk page is insane, and is one reason why I gave up in the
beginning.
I might take a stab on my own userspace to re-write this article. I'm
somewhat addicted fixing crappy BLP's. Perhaps I'll send it your way
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 14:21, Sarah Stierch sa...@sarahstierch.com wrote:
Hi. I actually brought up the issues with the references. While the second
article about the car is not self-published, it does not state in the
article that Danese is related to the owner of the vehicle or is named
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:36, Sarah Stierch sa...@sarahstierch.com wrote:
If anyone is interested in contributing to the decisions made about what
goes up on the front page of Commons, please visit here, I just found out
about this today, and I look forward to contributing:
http
that such remarks are discounted when
discussions are evaluated.
How do you know the comments were discounted, Fred? And that's not really
the point anyway. The comments were made. People felt it was okay to make
them. That's the culture we're trying to change.
Sarah
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:45, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
In this case, Sarah, change the policy of what should be in Main Page, or
change the Sexual policy (in discussion by the way).
Create a cruzade against that image would not change anything. And btw,
take political
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 16:32, Bob Sponge
metzgerhandwerk.hat.tradit...@googlemail.com wrote:
dear sarah
i want to give you a small feedback about your entries here about a
comment i did. (i found this list with a notice on my userpage in the
german wikipedia)
Pro i like her big tits
?
Any information from the Foundation about the legal situation, and
what Foundation policy is, would be very helpful.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
deals only with images where the subject is
unidentifiable. Even there, it's not clear what a woman is meant to do
if she finds an inappropriate image of herself on a Wikimedia project.
But if she's not identifiable -- if it's a body part -- it seems
there's nothing at all she can do.
Sarah
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 21:33, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think (after working in the fashion and photography private sector
for almost 10 years before non-profits) that model releases are as important
as OTRS copyright releases when it comes to sexual content
, then in maintaining them on the pages.
Sarah
The concept of being objectified needs to be explained to the community
and incorporated into our style guides. This has to make sense rather
than being misunderstood.
Fred
It's the kind of idea that people would become hostile towards,
because
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 14:53, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
(And yes, I was a little snappy on my nomination (this was my original rager
when I nominated a bunch of stuff from the high heels category..)...so no
need to reprimand meI've curbed my 'tude!)
I love your 'tude
get something wrong.
This is a good outcome.
Sydney Poore
Thanks for asking him to reconsider. It would be worth identifying a
set of Commons admins who are used to dealing with these issues --
privacy concerns, lack of model consent, possible voyeurism.
Sarah
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 06:50, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Three more things that I want to state clearly based on these conversations:
Commons bases identifiably on the face of an individual. While in many
situations, that maybe the only way to identify an individual, when
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:01, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
The problem with all of this on Wikimedia is the anonymity factor.
People could say I am the model and I hereby give consent. I don't
know how we get round that.
Sarah
Especially when the images
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:06, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
While I support the use of technology, I also fear that people put so much
trust into this technology they aren't aware of the lame content being
uploaded. They love to reiterate that if the bot approves it it's okay
That looks good, Ryan. Would it make sense to add something about the
release of the image? For example,
I personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video being taken and
released under a free licence.
Sarah
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:25, Arnaud HERVE arnaudhe...@x-mail.net wrote:
On 14/09/2011 16:56, Sarah wrote:
So the problem with the basic consent template as written -- I
personally created this media. All identifiable persons shown
specifically consented to this photograph or video
would all prefer not to comment.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
they lie outside the range when in fact they're
perfectly normal.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
of the iceberg. I may do some work on the article. Any help by
editors better
qualified than me welcome!
I agree about the Black Girls video. My wife showed it to me a few months
ago, and it's
stayed with me ever since.
As for your other point, about unnecessary surgery, Sarah spotted that we
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:25, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On *Sat, 1/10/11, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com* wrote:
Sarah, I am not sure what you've been trying to say lately[2].
Rest assured that it made
That's a brilliant logo and great post, Amy.
Sarah
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 21:14, Amy Senger a...@1x57.com wrote:
Hi Carole - I just added the Wikipedia:Change The Ratio logo to Wikicommons:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_Change_The_Ratio_Logo.jpg
Amy
--
co-founder, 1X57
the opposite on Wikipedia -- that women are often referred to as
females, rather than women. It reads to my eyes as though a man is
regarded as the default human position, and a female is another
version.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap
Excellent article, Sarah!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christine Meyer
christinewme...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, well said and well written. Congrats on this WP-less day.
Christine Meyer
User:Figureskatingfan
On Jan 18, 2012 11:37 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject
are welcome.
Regards,
emijrp
[1] http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wmcharts/wmchart0010.html
That's very interesting, thank you (and somewhat depressing).
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
to promote the idea that Wikipedia is wonderful. Come
and join us! On the other hand, acknowledging the community's
problems too openly puts out the opposite of that message. So we end
up not getting the kind of all-out, top-down push for community health
that we need.
Sarah
kind of project-wide
solution to this kind of thing.
Sarah
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
My wife pointed
to put someone on moderation). I haven't seen anything of late that
would have made me think extra moderation was needed, but I haven't
read all threads. I'd be willing, though, to be someone the other mods
can run something by.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Katie Chan k...@ktchan.info wrote:
On 31/10/2012 02:48, Tilman Bayer wrote:
Hi,
the survey invitation is only shown to logged-in editors in languages
where translations of the survey questionnaire exist (with Polish,
Portuguese and Italian launching a bit
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 1 November 2012 18:47, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we supposed to be seeing this invitation, or has it not been posted
yet?
I saw it today, on either meta or Commons (I forget which).
Thanks,
Sue
Hi
I just started filling it out, noticed I'd missed a question, backspaced --
my browser said the last page wasn't available, then when I tried to go
forward the next page wasn't available either. So it's gone, and no longer
showing up on my Commons watchlist.
Sarah
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
HAHAHA. Yes, page 106. A young unhappy goth with her dad in New Orleans.
My necklace spells out riot grrrl.
I owe you a beer :)
It's a good photograph. You dad looks nice, and you look cool (and nice
too). I like
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to share my report about the WikiWomen's Collaborative with you.
It's a project I developed as a way to engage and build community around
experienced and potential women editors
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please welcome Liz Kent Leon, our new co-moderator of the gender gap
list.
Hi Liz, welcome to the list!
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap
, more blatant.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4/29/13 12:20 PM, Sarah wrote:
I was reverted when I tried to remove them all, so I started an RfC on
the talk page, and alerted WikiProject Feminism. In turn, the editor who
added them (who uses a woman's
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
But I think it's important to mention it in the context of this thread. It
does seem to me that the sexism is getting worse, more blatant
allow women and men to be represented so differently suggests that
Wikipedia has a problem recognizing and dealing with sexism. So the
question is why, and how can we change it?
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
Andreas - when you say until the Foundation does something, what are you
looking for them to do?
You can always directly write the legal team and ask them for input on
what they could do regarding your concerns
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
Andreas - when you say until the Foundation does something, what are you
looking for them to do?
You can always directly write the legal team and ask them for input on
what they could do regarding your concerns
not a particularly pleasant
experience. I understand why people don't want to get involved.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
and edges us closer to a solution that would surely be a really good
outcome for the list.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Sarah et al
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is my first Commons deletion nom. I'm trying to act rather
than
expecting others to do it, but it's
percentage of the cases we're seeing, where there's no evidence of
consent to a release of the kind needed for Commons.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
helpful, about how to prepare students for assignments
on Wikipedia.
Sorry, it's quite a lot to read, but there are some helpful links to
other pages.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:50 PM, Sarah wrote:
We've got Wikipedia:Gendergap
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Gendergap that we could do
something with, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014 10:27 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never been suspended (whatever that means) by anyone or anything.
If you're talking about me..? Before I'm the victim of any BLP violations
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014 11:14 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeremy, which quote is this? I recall someone on this list saying that
someone called Sarah was suspended (unclear what's meant) for an off-wiki
comment
probably has enough of an income to consider this, given the potential
impact on the atmosphere and editor retention.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
to find yourself hovering over a link without intending to, so if
you're in an article that contains such links, you can suddenly have images
of genitalia on your screen without having clicked on the links that
contain them.
Sarah
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com
, your post was interesting and on-topic. Please don't be
discouraged from letting us know about these issues. They have been
happening a lot and seem to be increasing.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Neotarf neot...@gmail.com wrote:
Any journalists in future wanting examples of it need only read those
archives and the dispute-resolution threads that failed to deal with it
(which one of us ought to compile at some point).
An interesting idea. What would
more?
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
#Guardian_article_about_the_proposed_decision
if anyone is interested.
Sarah
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
Maybe I'm missing something - what's her username?
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Susan Spencer susan.spen...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia editors,
Can someone look into Danese's pages please?
She probably wouldn't mind
=Danese_Cooperoldid=348062767
And the most recent removal is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Danese_Cooperoldid=386051343
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Sarah Stierchsa...@sarahstierch.com wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something - what's her username?
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance
=Danese_Cooperoldid=386051343
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Sarah Stierch
sa...@sarahstierch.com mailto:sa...@sarahstierch.com wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something - what's her username?
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or
errors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danese_Cooper
I was able to find a citing source about your knitting, but, I can't use
the self-published sources about your dads car. Now, if someone wants to
interview you and write that article, then sweet, I can use it =)
Sarah
On 4/13/2011 3:58 PM, Danese
wants to add the
information, go for it. I already did my part to re-write the article,
and Fred lent a hand too.
:D
Sarah
On 4/14/2011 3:12 PM, Susan Spencer wrote:
Fred,
I agree with you.
Especially with handkraft information, there won't be 'references'.
You can't reference what your
It does! Thanks fellow-Sarah!
To be honest, my early editing experiences often make me a more paranoid when
writing BLPs, so perhaps I took the rules too seriously myself!
Thank you again, a little guidance and clarity always goes a long way :)
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my
This is the kind of imagery I have no desire to see on the front page of
Commons. I'm a very liberal person, but, this makes me not want to even
allow my MOTHER to use Commons.
#wikilove,
Sarah
--
Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
Sarah
to add you to our HOW-TO gang if you like.
=)
Sarah
On 5/17/2011 8:17 AM, Deanna Zandt wrote:
I'd also be interested in contributing-- the BLP experience of last
week was incredibly enlightening, and got me thinking about access...
having the right key unlocked a wealth of knowledge and aid
://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
--
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural artistic research, advising event planning.
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com
characters) - they assume because of my name I am one thing. The only thing
I can do is prove them wrong, including the women sometimes too.
I often channel my anger into changing things. But, when I think about my
own experiences, I have no idea what to to do about them.
-Sarah
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011
comments. Sometimes I forget SCA does
historical, there is another group that does fantasy. I have friends who do
both! (hell, my first job was at a role playing game store in high school. :D)
Thanks for the clarification!
Sarah
--
Michael J. Orange Mike Lowrey
a/k/a Lord Inali of Tanasi, G.D.H
/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising.*
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https
to share your thoughts and
feelings!
#wikilove!
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural
/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising.*
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https
.
And I know I come off like a total nut when complaining about Commons, but,
I'm getting sick and tired of it. I'm sick and tired of fighting about
categories, educational material definitions, and double standards.
In a bit of a trollish mood, if you couldn't tell,
Sarah
We can't walk away
/
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising
LOL, at least he realizes I'm on a vendetta against crappy profile personal
photos too:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bio_picture.jpg
The more people speak out against crap on Commons the more our voices will
be heard.
;)
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Sarah
surprised that there isn't a Children's Television WikiProject (or task
force for WP:Television).
I just pulled up the article [[Sesame Street, New York, New York]] and I
think I'm going to edit it a bit =) I'm surprised someone hasn't tagged it
as missing coordinates ;)
-Sarah
On Mon, Sep 5
Daniel, I totally 3 your use of denial and hostile work environment.
Chiming in right now. Been following it since it was posted on WP:Feminism
and was sickened by the conversation, so had to move on..
-Sarah
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net
on iPhoneography, or at least an event that
releases all images created CC-BY-A.
If I do come across the rare crappy cell phone photo (it is indeed rare), I
tag it low quality (if it is) and if we have better images of that subject
of better quality, I will nominate it for deletion.
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI
medical images are acceptable. Many of us aren't in
that environment :) Many of us also like surprises, but not naked surprises
(outside of perhaps your love life).
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives
for uploaders with sexual content making sure they want to do it
- And I'll throw in a review of Flickr policy.
Sarah
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Sydney Poore sydney.po...@gmail.comwrote:
See the standard for medical images from the American Medical College of
Genetics
http://www.acmg.net
this to the larger community. (And the pros/cons of
course).
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural
in a voyeuristic manner uploading images to Commons,
Flickr, whatever. Just because someone (of any gender) lays on the beach,
walks down the street wearing something sexy, or whatever, doesn't mean they
are asking to have their photograph taken.
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador
for appropriateness and copyright correctness. I suppose we
are one step ahead, it's just irritating when you come across an image's
source and this is what you get:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22186088@N03/4038072177/
Sarah
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Chris Keating
chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote
(of any gender) lays on the beach,
walks down the street wearing something sexy, or whatever, doesn't mean
they
are asking to have their photograph taken.
-Sarah
How about this one:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:TalkingintheRoad.JPG
Anyone's permission
I applied for Commons OTRS today...
Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Sep 12, 2011, at 5:45 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like we have strong
not sure if we're ready to move it to meta yet, I do wish we had a more
private place to develop this. It's a rather sensitive topic for folks.
Perhaps a google doc or...?
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
it someplace
public, that's fine. I'll let other participants make the final decision =)
*eyeballs everyone else*
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch
), not the portraits..but the
round badges. I'd love to see something like this developed for Wikipedia.
I'd have them on my tumblr, etc.
http://wikifashion.com/wiki/Wikifashion:Contributors_Needed
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian
://wikigender.org/index.php/New_Home
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising
I'm doing...
-Sarah
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:08 AM, carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
Looking at my wikiquotes talk page for the first time in a while, I was
reminded that is another area women's contributions may not be taken as
seriously.
Example: the deletion in 2009 of poet Marcella
Hopefully that'll change (I think?)
I encourage everyone to improve on it and watch the super awesome video I
just added from the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. They sure
don't do hair like they used to
:D
-Sarah
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Nicole Willson
Ack! I just nominated somethingand you did also!
-Sarah
(mine was about the 5 foot tall hairdo and Marie Antoinette...)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
**
Wow, that was fast! Nice work. I think this deserves a DYK :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/15/11
to add content that needs to be
created as well.
-Sarah
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Joseph Reagle joseph.2...@reagle.orgwrote:
On Friday, September 16, 2011, Amy Senger wrote:
Hi Folks - I know there is a page in Wikipedia with ideas/projects to
address the gendergap which I forgot
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising.*
--
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap
, but interesting.
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising
or images, or edits, is a donation, in a way, to the
world of knowledge. It's so important to let one another know that the work
we're doing is important - regardless of gender - but that it also has a
special image on women..and our contributions.
Your daily reminder... :)
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI
. There is a
lot of work to do, but, if we can develop successes with women, I like to
think we can develop opportunities with more specific communities - and
perhaps both at the same time.
-Sarah
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 9/19/11 4:26 PM
Look who's in the DYK! :)
Go team!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural
better
coverage on Wikimedia, and ask them for a media donation today. Then, of
course, brag about them on Facebook, Twitter, mailing lists, etc, and praise
them for how awesome they are for helping the mission and encourage others
to join in. ;)
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador
it to barber :X http://stats.grok.se/en/201109/Barber
-Sarah
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes! Go us!
From,
Emily
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:35 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
very nice.
--
John Vandenberg
Laura - this is probably more of a topic for say cultural partnerships - if you
would like (and I would suggest it) I can add you there, I co-mod the list.
-Sarah (Stierch)
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Sep 23, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Laura Hale la
1 - 100 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
