On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
There was an idea brainstormed a little while back with me and a few other
folks about seeking funding to have a Wiki Loves Women photography event
that wanted photographers to take photographs of women - and this
On 5/6/12 1:07 PM, Carol Moore DC wrote:
On 5/2/2012 9:39 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
Don't miss http://thehairpin.com/2011/01/women-laughing-alone-with-salad
Where are women laughing as they chop up bloody sausage...
To me I guess I see hostility and dominance in the kind of shots
people
Good idea Sarah. Prove everyone in the world we don't even have enough
woman in the 9% of editors who can take a picture of some trivial thing.
Prove the world the only way to have picture of girls in commons is hiring
models and photographers to take them.
I have NO idea why no one thought of
Excuse me, Beria, but I agree that your tone is, in fact,
highly inappropriate.
From,
Emily
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
Sarah, until i tell you to fuck off I'm being respectful to you.
Actually the simple meaning of taking time in my volunteer,
This is highly inappropriate:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beriadiff=3706794oldid=3691439(at
that is just the last one, I can give you both a pile bigger than the
Everest)
And none of you are seing me complain about it. A single mail with irony
and you run around claiming
Of course, that's inappropriate and rude. So were you, but we all know that
you know better.
From,
Emily
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
This is highly inappropriate:
That's a good point. Even here in San Francisco it's much easier to find
female nudity in art and advertising than male nudity. I just wish
people would stick to commenting on the art instead of the woman's body.
Ryan Kaldari
On 5/2/12 12:40 AM, Caroline Becker wrote:
The problem is, we live
Is there a perception bias here?
There are many many fine art nudes of men in existence. And if you look at
the body of work for nude sculpture then many are male - Pope Pius IX was
so enraged by this he even went around sticking fig leaves over all the
cocks in the vatican*, an utter travesty
Advertising not sexist. Really.
I realize this is a tangent, but if I am going to see cumshot in my email
list a few more times, I might as well join in.
Hi all!
Heather
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote:
Is there a perception bias here?
Advertising not sexist. Really.
Well I'd be interested to hear rational arguments that it is...
I've always found advertising to be highly sexualised, but refreshingly
free of sexism.
Tom
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
On May 2, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
Advertising not sexist. Really.
Well I'd be interested to hear rational arguments that it is...
I've always found advertising to be highly sexualised, but refreshingly free
of sexism.
You're kidding, right? Advertising is so jam-loaded
Perfect opportunity to share one of my favorite blog memes:
http://thehairpin.com/2011/11/women-struggling-to-drink-water
Ryan Kaldari
On 5/2/12 2:20 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
Advertising not sexist. Really.
Well I'd be interested to hear rational arguments that it is...
I've always
On 2 May 2012 22:22, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 2, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
I've always found advertising to be highly sexualised, but refreshingly
free of sexism.
I tend to agree with Heather...this strains credibility. It's hard to know
whether to
On 2 May 2012 22:27, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
**
Perfect opportunity to share one of my favorite blog memes:
http://thehairpin.com/2011/11/women-struggling-to-drink-water
Ryan Kaldari
*sigh* well I entirely agree with Alison's point. But that one is
definitely perception
Perfect opportunity to share one of my favorite blog memes:
http://thehairpin.com/2011/11/women-struggling-to-drink-water
Seriously though, it doesn't seem that controversial to say that
mainstream advertising heavily skews to female nudity. Next time you
pass a magazine stand, count the
On 2 May 2012 22:36, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
**
Perfect opportunity to share one of my favorite blog memes:
http://thehairpin.com/2011/11/women-struggling-to-drink-water
Seriously though, it doesn't seem that controversial to say that
mainstream advertising heavily skews
On 5/2/12 2:38 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
On 2 May 2012 22:36, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org
mailto:rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Perfect opportunity to share one of my favorite blog memes:
http://thehairpin.com/2011/11/women-struggling-to-drink-water
Seriously though, it
Wonderful.
Don't miss http://thehairpin.com/2011/01/women-laughing-alone-with-salad
Andreas
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
**
Perfect opportunity to share one of my favorite blog memes:
http://thehairpin.com/2011/11/women-struggling-to-drink-water
Speaking of gender and nudity, it seems the bias towards female nudity
at en.wiki's Featured Picture Candidates is still as strong as ever. And
check out the quality comments at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/The_Pearl_and_the_Wave
After you guys are
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article
uses
a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German
This is a great idea. We'll see if the bleating that the image is
educational is quite so strong if it's male-on-male ;-)
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Moore DC
carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay
As far as I remember the nake-hub of commons (As i call it) has no
problem at all with homosexuality. Who has the problem is the other side of
commons, the puritans (several here in that list) who cant see a naked
picture - wherever is there is a man, a woman, a hetero sex relation, a gay
or
If you are curious about the images used in the same article on other
language editions of Wikipedia you can use Manypedia.
For the page Cumshot, it seems currently the same image is used on
all language editions, while the Spanish one uses one more image
http://www.manypedia.com/#|en|Cumshot|es
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
No one here has commented on the fact that the German Wikipedia article uses
a special, local version of one of Seedfeeder's images. The German version
is more amateurish, and a little more nasty. Compare:
Hey everybody,
a friend of mine sent me a notice: the Wikipedia article Cumshot has a
picture which in my humble opinion is nothing else than pornography.
once again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumshot
I already tried to delete it from the German Wikipedia - but its being
restored
While the picture could be described as somewhat pornographic, I'll
have to agree with previous participants in this email conversation. This
article IS porn-related, so a pornographic cartoon can be used to
illustrate it, per WP:NOTCENSORED.
From,
Emily
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Carol
Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of gender in
articles like this...
Just a thought :)
Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.com wrote:
While the picture
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
Andreas
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:
NO need to censor it. Just do a second one with bushier eyebrows and a
goatee and put that up instead :-)
On
I agree with what Beria says here. And I think it's a very important
distinction, especially when comparing to Sue's blog post. Sue's post was about
the article pregnancy -- not an article about pornography.
On a personal level, I happen to agree with you that there's lots of
pornographic
On 27 April 2012 20:54, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
*Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of
gender in articles like this...*
Should I ask what the appropriate equal representation in this case might
be? Female to male.ejaculation?
_
I
A Google image search for gay cumshot indicates there are 37.8 million
results. Cumshot -gay has 44 million. If these numbers are correct, then
gay and non-gay cumshots are almost equally common online, and it's a
toss-up (pun intended) as to which we should use.
There are really two separate
Hi Andreas
Some observations-
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
A Google image search for gay cumshot indicates there are 37.8 million
results. Cumshot -gay has 44 million. If these numbers are correct, then
gay and non-gay cumshots are almost equally
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 27 April 2012 20:54, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
*Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of
gender in articles like this...*
Should I ask what the appropriate
Fun fact: Female ejaculation is the most viewed Wikipedia article
related in any way to feminism (at least since WikiProject Feminism
started keeping stats). It's 3 times as popular as the next article on
the list, Abortion.
Ryan Kaldari
On 4/27/12 2:52 PM, Laura Hale wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
**
Fun fact: Female ejaculation is the most viewed Wikipedia article related
in any way to feminism (at least since WikiProject Feminism started keeping
stats). It's 3 times as popular as the next article on the list,
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay porn is underrepresented in these articles.
Andreas
So if I was too implicit in my statement. As Andreas surmised, I meant
re-do that photo to make it male on male. Or do a second one that's male
on male. Go
I'm not sure the technical term for it either, but the laymen's term is
female ejactulation. *shrugs*
From,
Emily
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.netwrote:
On 4/27/2012 3:45 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
I could have a go again, Carol. :)
Gay porn is
37 matches
Mail list logo
