Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 22:43:12 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit :
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 30 Apr 2018, at 22:28, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> >
> > Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 21:03:24 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit :
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >>> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:43, Hervé
Sent from my iPad
> On 30 Apr 2018, at 22:28, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 21:03:24 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit :
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:43, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't get what's the issue
Sent from my iPad
> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:43, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> I don't get what's the issue with creating a test Git repo, that is
> independent from anything else, and that was discussed on the ML
There are no issue as such, it is just that lately we have seen
I don't get what's the issue with creating a test Git repo, that is
independent from anything else, and that was discussed on the ML
I did the exact same at GitHub just because it was outside Apache then was
even more clear that it was a side test to have chance to get common tests
instead of
Sent from my iPad
>> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:00, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 30 April 2018 at 18:39, Jan Iversen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which
>> I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I
On 30 April 2018 at 18:39, Jan Iversen wrote:
> Hi
>
> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which I
> cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with).
>
> I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call to
>
Hi
We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which I
cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with).
I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call to
all:
“I must however state that the word “consensus” seems to mean