Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread Luke Han
Hi John, Thank you to remind and I'm sorry I was count votes only based on my understanding, per previous discussion and your comments in vote thread about SGA [1], as a programmer, I was thinking: if ( SGA == confirmed) { John's Vote = +1 } else { John's Vote =

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

2015-10-25 Thread Li Yang
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:50 AM, hongbin ma wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Oct 23, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

2015-10-25 Thread Don Bosco Durai
+1 non binding  Bosco  _ From: Li Yang Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation To: +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:50 AM, hongbin ma

Request to be added to Incubator PMC

2015-10-25 Thread Patrick Wendell
Hi All, I would like to be added to the Incubator PMC to help mentor a new project. I am an Apache Member. I am not sure the exact process to be added, so I am emailing this list as a first step! Cheers, - Patrick

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread John D. Ament
Ted, After catching up on email, I see the SGA was now processed. I am concerned though after looking at their latest release vote that we're still missing a few things related to "Verify distribution rights." It's not enough for me to say that they're far off, but after seeing the issues

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread Ted Dunning
John, Was this issue not rectified to your satisfaction? On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi Luke, > > Actually I voted -1 due to your open SGA issues. > On Oct 22, 2015 11:24 PM, "Luke Han" wrote: > > > The vote for Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

2015-10-25 Thread hongbin ma
+1 (non binding) On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ralph > > > On Oct 23, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun > wrote: > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > >

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread John D. Ament
Hi Luke, Actually I voted -1 due to your open SGA issues. On Oct 22, 2015 11:24 PM, "Luke Han" wrote: > The vote for Apache Kylin to become a top-level project has passed > with 27 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. > > Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast

[Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread Andrew Purtell
Hi Luke, By my count there was more than one binding -1 raised during the vote and I don't think all were changed during subsequent discussion. At a minimum let's post a corrected RESULT, but I believe by ensuring the raised issues are satisfactorily resolved and then starting another vote you

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

2015-10-25 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 (binding) Ralph > On Oct 23, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an incubation > project. > > The vote is open for 72

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread John D. Ament
I don't think resubmission of a vote is required. According to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#ipmc-top-level-recommendation it's a consensus vote. I don't believe it has to be unanimous, I would just prefer to not be misrepresented. John On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:54 PM

Re: [Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-25 Thread Henry Saputra
Seemed like John is the only -1 due to missing update on SGA information. John said he +1 given that the XML status file is updated to reflect it and it had been updated so we just assumed his VOTE become +1 automatically per his statement. John, if you would like to still to record your VOTE as