*bq. no need to add anything into NOTICE*
Correction: here we need to analyze the Spark NOTICE file and the relevant
portions bubbled up into the top-level NOTICE file [1], as already pointed
out by Justin in previous reply [2].
Best Regards,
Yu
[1]
+1 (non-binding):
Lidor Ettinger 于2023年1月25日周三 16:27写道：
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for your review and vote for Apache Liminal version
> 0.0.5rc2-INCUBATING. I'm happy to announce the vote has passed:
>
> +1 (binding):
> Justin Mclean
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Davor Bonaci
>
>
> +1 (non-binding):
>
Thanks for the further clarification Justin, it helps a lot. And thanks for
correcting me. Now I understand that I should have referred to the
3rd-party section [1] instead.
Explicitly, I think the action-to-do is to add (append) the below lines
into the Celeborn LICENSE file [2] (similar to that
Hi,
> *bq. It belongs in LICENSE not NOTICE only copyright notices that have been
> removed (by or with the permission of the owner) get listed in NOTICE*
> Since Guava is also with ALv2, referring to [1], my understanding is that:
> 1. There should be no copyright notice in the header (#2)
> 2.
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the quick reply.
*bq. Not sure why you are discussing this on your private list*
Since I'm not sure whether the team has already addressed the issue and
prepared another RC, and I'm not sure whether my understanding is correct,
so I reduce the discussion scope to internal
Docker desktop is not free any more, I am wondering whether ASF has any
agreement with docker. Or does each apache project need to apply for this
docker open source program separately?
https://www.docker.com/community/open-source/application/
--
Best Regards
Jeff Zhang
Hi,
> I'm a little confused about the license process;
> 1. If the license header of the third-party code contains Copyright, can it
> be kept in our code, or should it be removed and only declared in the NOTICE
> file
The 3rd party header has to be keep in your code and not removed. Copyright
As I understand you can release under the WIP disclaimer
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:31 AM Zikuan An wrote:
> Thanks for your valuable suggestion.
>
> I will revisit the whole process and re-open the vote after fixing the
> issues you mentioned.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Zikuan An
>
> Justin Mclean
Hi Jason,
AFAIK it is ok to use it in tests while you don't reference it explicitly
in your code (which means delivering it or implementing its SPI/classes and
you don't let it be transitive in any assembly somehow) so would mean ok to
use in test while you stay under JPA API.
So it would be more
Question for the group, since I have seen things that seem contradictory. How
do projects handle Hibernate since it's LGPL and as such, a Category X
dependency?
It seems like simply using the library is fine. However, then you see things
about "linking" to the library, does simply using the
Hi,
there are some example:
1. Contains Copyright:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hugegraph/pull/2100/files#diff-4b9f512f829374901fd2d6e736770a6bd4652b35730c63745f7547b4b32a
2. Both are apache licenses, but the format is different. Do we want to keep
the license of the other party and
Hi,
I'm a little confused about the license process;
1. If the license header of the third-party code contains Copyright, can it be
kept in our code, or should it be removed and only declared in the NOTICE file
2. If a large class/file refers to a small piece of code (or subclass), how to
choose
+1，I checked：
[√] Download links are valid.
[√] DISCLAIMER is included.
[√] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[√] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each EventMesh repo.
[√] All files have license headers if necessary.
vnbear 于2023年1月30日周一
Thanks for the reply, we choose the "loose license" in the multiple choices,
and now we only keep one (selected) license instead of list them all in
'LICENSE' file.
Could you help us to review the correctness of the latest update?[1] After
confirmation, we will modify all other repos soon
1.
Hi,
It's a better to have ASF header in all files where it's possible.
However, it's sometime difficult (test static files, web content, ..).
So if you can, it's better Pekko community fixes it.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 6:31 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The
Hello everyone,
I'm cancelling this vote
https://lists.apache.org/thread/jysnc4q3z99x4bwjf7ztm06zhh35ob4x
due to licenses issues. I'll fix them and start a new vote process.
Thanks a lot for all your help.
Best,
Zikuan An
Thanks for your valuable suggestion.
I will revisit the whole process and re-open the vote after fixing the
issues you mentioned.
Best,
Zikuan An
Justin Mclean 于2023年1月19日周四 16:25写道：
> Hi,
>
> Because it contains a restriction of use clause e.g. "This license does
> not include the right to
17 matches
Mail list logo
