Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

[amitsel...@gmail.com] > > * Ben Chambers[bchamb...@google.com] > > * Craig Chambers [chamb...@google.com] > > * Dan Halperin[dhalp...@google.com] > > * Davor Bonaci[da...@google.com] > > * Frances Perry

Incubator wiki

FelixCheung Permission to edit please

Re: [VOTE] Accept Airflow into the Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:41 PM moon soo Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM Timothy Chen wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tim > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Arthur Wiedmer > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:03 AM Vasudevan, Ramkrishna S < ramkrishna.s.vasude...@intel.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards > Ram > > -Original Message- > From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:kai.zh...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:54 PM > To:

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:46 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Zeppelin from the Incubator

eby is created, the person holding such office to > > serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair > > of the Apache Zeppelin Project, and to have primary responsibility > > for management of the projects within the scope of > > responsibility of the Apache Zepp

Re: [VOTE] Bring Griffin to Apache Incubator

+1 On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:40 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi All, > > As the champion for Griffin, I would like to start VOTE to bring the > project as Apache incubator podling. > > Here is the direct quote from the abstract: > > " > Griffin is a Data Quality Service

Re: [VOTE] Accept Amaterasu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:59 PM Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 17 April 2017 at 04:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > following the discussion thread, I think we can start the vote on > > accepting Amaterasu

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

ul 7, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If it is optional at compile-time, then a header file is very allowable. > As > > long as MXNet can be compiled without ZeroMQ on the box, then I see no > > issue at all. > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

Isn't the release binaries going to contain bits from zeromq because of #include though? That header file is still going to be LGPL 3.0 licensed right? On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:45 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Mu, > > So what happens when ZeroMQ is not available, do you

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

box, then I see no > issue at all. > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Felix Cheung <felixche...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Isn't the release binaries going to contain bits from zeromq because of > > #include though? > > > > That header file is still going

Re: R package in Apache projects

Thanks Qiang. To clarify, Spark or SparkR does not depend on Rcpp. And SparkR is part of the Spark source and binary release. On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:31 PM Qiang Kou wrote: > Hi, > > I am sending this email for how to handle R package in an Apache project. > Any opinions

Re: [VOTE] Superset Proposal for Apache Incubator

+1 (nonbinding) On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:13 PM Jeff Feng wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Thank you for checking out our proposal on Superset and for your > consideration for the Apache Incubator. So far, I believe we have 8 > binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. > > As

Re: [VOTE] Livy to enter Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:14 AM Hitesh Shah wrote: > +1 > > -- Hitesh > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Apache Incubator. > > > > The full proposal is available

IPMC join request

Hi all, I'd like to join IPMC, initially to help mentor Dr Elephant as incubator project but also looking forward to help mentor other Apache incubator projects. I am PPMC/PMC of Apache Zeppelin (since incubation to TLP) and PMC of Apache Spark, Release Manager for releases. Thanks! Felix

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pinot into Apache Incubator

+1 On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:34 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Willem Jiang > > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Pierre

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Hi Kishore - do you need one more mentor? On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:10 AM kishore g wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose Pinot as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal > is available as a draft at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PinotProposal. > I > have also

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

+1 (non binding) awesome to see this is taken forward to the incubator and looking forward to collaborate with the community! On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:09 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:06 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > > > The discuss thread seems to have reached

Re: [Vote] call a vote for IoTDB incubation proposal

+1 cool project On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:02 AM Gosling Von wrote: > +1 > > Good luck ~ > > Von Gosling > > > > 在 2018年11月7日，下午3:46，hxd 写道： > > > > Hi, > > Sorry for the previous mail with bad format. > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept IoTDB project, a database for managing > large amounts

Re: Mentors wanted for Apache Dubbo (incubating)

Very cool project. Would love to act as mentor (went through incubator with a project myself) but I’m not on IPMC. Would try to help in other ways. Keep it up! On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:34 PM Huxing Zhang wrote: > Hi community, > > The Apache Dubbo project now has two active mentors, and is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hudi into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:20 AM Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 13, 2019, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Following the discussion of the Hudi proposal in [1], this is a vote > > on accepting Hudi into the Apache Incubator, > > per the

Re: [DISCUSS] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

+1 On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:56 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi all, > > The Apache Incubator is still having a repository on git-wip-us as well > [1]. > > Does anyone have a problem with moving over the incubator repository to > gitbox voluntarily? > This means integrated access and easy PRs

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc8)

+1 (binding) a few comments below, checked: filename signature & hash DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE build from src no binary src files have headers (see below) comments, not blocker for release IMO: 1. CREDITS file is a bit non-standard in an ASF release - this is generally not included as it is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc8)

at 12:29 AM Jonas Pfefferle wrote: > Hi Felix > > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:43:45 -0800 > Felix Cheung wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > a few comments below, checked: > > filename > > signature & hash > > DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE > >

Incubator Wiki write access

It might have lost my earlier account. My username is FelixCheung Thanks

Re: Edit access to apache wiki

It happens again so I’m pretty sure certain email is filtering this as spam. Neha, please give your account name (register there https://wiki.apache.org/ first) so you can be added. Also as discussed Pinot is not required to report April. -- > *From:* Neha Pawar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.6.0 (incubating) based on RC2

/server/ui/static/css/bootstrap.min.css On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:05 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 3:57 PM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > I have LANG=“en_US.UTF-8” > > I tried a couple of things finally it passed when I use virtualenv - my > > python is Py

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.6.0 (incubating) based on RC2

I see, thanks. Perhaps the way I unzip the src zip file then. Is it a better approach to unpack it? On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:03 AM sebb wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 05:25, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > This test is consistently failing when I build, any idea what’s wrong in &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.6.0 (incubating) based on RC2

t be the > > problem. > > > It may be the test is expecting the output of child processes (in this > > case > > > the python interpreter) to be UTF-8. > > > > > > > > If that is the case, then the test case ought to be fixed... > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Livy 0.6.0 (incubating) based on RC2

This test is consistently failing when I build, any idea what’s wrong in my setup? - should print unicode correctly *** FAILED *** (101 milliseconds) ExecuteSuccess(JObject(List((text/plain,JString(☺) did not equal ExecuteSuccess(JObject(List((text/plain,JString(☺)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:39 PM Vinayakumar B wrote: > +1 > > -Vinay > > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 7:22 am Huxing Zhang, wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:50 AM Antoine Toulme > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.1.0 RC0

+1 (binding) Carrying my vote from dev@ checked license headers compiled from source, ran tests, demo checked name includes incubating checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE checked signature and hashes checked no unexpected binary files On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:45 AM Seunghyun Lee wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:17 PM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 10:15 PM Furkan KAMACI > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra < > > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataSketches into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 14/03/2019 22:23, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've discussed the proposal for the DataSketches project in [1] and [2]. > > The > > proposal itself has been put on the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:23 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > +1 > > Would be interesting if this project includes training for developing > Apache projects in any way, or would that make more sense under ComDev > or some other project? > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 09:09, Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > > > >

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

... so I think we need to provide an option here. No question that any unauthorized release is not allowed. But what about while voting for a release? It sounds like httpd has the same problem since some of these listed “releases” are failed vote attempts (and so not official releases) >From a

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

I’d agree- it’s a “feature” of GitHub and I didn’t see a way to turn off “turning a git tag into a release” I see that there is a API to edit a release to say it is “pre-release” https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/releases/#edit-a-release IMO either way it should be ok because a) the tag is

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Arrow Rust DataFusion

+1 (Checked IP clearance) On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:57 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > Apache Arrow is receiving a donation of "DataFusion" a Rust library > that computes analytical queries on Arrow columnar memory. It is > intended to work together with the Arrow Rust library [1]. > > Please vote

incubator wiki - Please provide write access to incubator PMC report wiki for Pinot

Could someone please add user *sbeeram* On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:06 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > (A little strange as I didn’t see this thread before, so I’m trying to > send it) > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:02 AM Sunitha Beeram > wrote: > >> +Felix >>

Re: incubator wiki - Please provide write access to incubator PMC report wiki for Pinot

Thanks Justin! On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:23 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Could someone please add user *sbeeram* > > Done. > > Thanks, > Justin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >

Re: Please provide write access to incubator PMC report wiki for Pinot

(A little strange as I didn’t see this thread before, so I’m trying to send it) On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:02 AM Sunitha Beeram wrote: > +Felix > > > > *From: *Sunitha Beeram > *Date: *Wednesday, January 30, 2019 at 2:37 PM > *To: *"general@incubator.apache.org" > *Cc:

Re: Podling reports due Wednesday

I don’t mind taking on as a mentor for Spot but it seems the volume of interaction (commits, dev@) has gone down significantly in the last 6-9 months? On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:21 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Currently we’re missing only one sign off and that is for: > Spot > > Which, I

Re: Incubator policy wording

Hi Justin, two thoughts 1. Should we move disclaimer and release up instead of being the last? Seems like good to be upfront with these 2. About “It MAY consider the termination of a Podling if violations are not corrected.“ Should we put a timeframe on the correction? It seems like violations

Re: [VOTE] Accept DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler) into Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:11 AM ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I believe the DolphinScheduler project will bring value to ASF. The team is > very open and the community is already very active. Glad to see it to join > the incubator. > > Best regards, > > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 > Apache

Re: Incubator policy wording

I think rewording the termination spew could help as there has been feedback on incubator coming across as “unwelcoming” etc. Just my 2c On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:22 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > 1. Should we move disclaimer and release up instead of being

Re: [MENTORS] IPMC Policy change work in progress disclaimer

+1 On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:17 PM Paul King wrote: > Kudos for progressing this idea. I really like it. It should allow > improvements from the perspective of both podlings and reviewers. > > Cheers, Paul. > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:25 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The work

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

(D) will still require 2 more IPMC vote? (E) will be like (B) in that it will need mentors or other IPMC to vote in podling dev@? On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:04 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > One of the incubator pain points is the double voting on releases first by > the podling and then by

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

option (D) combined with (E) And encourage mentors to vote on dev@ makes sense to me On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:24 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > (D) will still require 2 more IPMC vote? > > (E) will be like (B) in that it will need mentors or other IPMC to vote > in > > podling dev@? > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

+1 Great project! On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:40 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > A big +1 (binding) from me > > Chris > > Von: Julian Feinauer > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 20:19:43 > An: general@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

I will look into later today. On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:57 PM Adrian Schuepbach < adrian.schuepb...@gribex.net> wrote: > Hi Felix > > Would you be available to vote on this Apache Crail release? > > Thanks > Adrian > > > > On 12/14/19 00:32, Adrian Schüpbach wrote: > > Dear all > > > > Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] YuniKorn Proposal

ency manager, BSD 2-Clause License > > > > 2.8.2 Cryptography > > YuniKorn does not currently include any cryptography-related code. > > > > 2.9 Required Resources > > > > 2.9.1 Mailing lists: > > - priv...@yunikorn.incubator.apache.org (PMC list) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.2.0 RC0

+1 Built and ran tests. I’ve been trying to run some tools in the last few days for license header in file, so far the tools are not working out. Oh well. Btw, rat check doesn’t seem to cover all files in the project? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:35 AM Subbu Subramaniam wrote: > Hi all, > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

dist.apache.org is having some issue. Let me check back On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:57 PM Adrian Schuepbach < adrian.schuepb...@gribex.net> wrote: > Hi Felix > > Would you be available to vote on this Apache Crail release? > > Thanks > Adrian > > > > On 12/14/19 00:32, Adrian Schüpbach wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

+1 binding Checked Name Disclaimer Signature License Header Compile from source On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:52 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE is fine > - NOTICE has incorrect

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

+1 On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:54 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I > would like > > to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. > >

Re: Mentors wanted for projects

Can we call out projects that might be at risk in some way (community growth, list traffic, low change count) It might help to bring attention to those needing help or should rather retire. On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:47 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It generally seen that the right amount

Re: [VOTE] Accept YuniKorn into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:54 AM David Lyle wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > -David... > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:47 PM Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > vino...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache Incubator. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

+1 (binding) I can offer to mentor this project, if needed (have done graph and Postgres work in the past) On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:18 AM Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > +1 ( binding ) > > Regards > Kevin > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:26 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.8.0

+1 (binding) Carry over my vote On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:05 PM Weiwei Yang wrote: > Hello IPMC > > The Apache YuniKorn community has voted and approved the release Apache > YuniKorn (incubating) 0.8.0. We now kindly request the IPMC members review > and vote in this release. > > YuniKorn is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for the update. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files find (some test .gz are there) - Source files have ASF headers (except tests & config) - Did not try compile from source On Fri, Sep 4, 2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC1 (Please ignore the earlier email sent under non apache Email)

It’s a bit strange under node_modules. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - Unexpected binary files Several strange files are in the source tarball

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.1

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.9.0 (release candidate 1)

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash are fine - tarball (see note) the file unpacks into the current and not a subdirectory, is a bit strange - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - build from source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - didn't try - compile from source On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:12 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg wrote: > Hello IPMC > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Incubator: > > > > Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors, > > committers and community members. > > The Apache(incubating) TVM community has formally voted for graduation and > > bring the case

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

I see jlowe is a binding IPMC vote that can carry forward from dev@ vote. We just need 1 more binding vote. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:06 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - incubating in name > - signature and hash fine > - DISCLAIMER is fine > - LICENSE a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.2

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - did not compile On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:31 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > > > +1 (binding, carrying over my

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 ;) On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:31 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for addressing everything I brought up here and on your private > list. There's still a little more to do, but it’s being dealt with, so I’m > all good with you graduating. Do keep an eye on how you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

One more vote please! On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:59 AM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need one more vote please, we're anxious to publish this release! > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:17 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > > F

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

(Carry my vote, as stated already) +1 On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:20 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on and approved a > proposal to > release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0. > The voting thread can be found here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Furkan, can you help? On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Justin and Felix, > > > > warm thanks for taking the time to vote! The minimum 72h voting time is > now complete, and it would be great to get that last missing vote from the > IPMC to be able to release this highly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Moon is now on IPMC. On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:26 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > > > That's great news! I look forward to releasing in 5 hours then! > > > > Ville > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 16:49 Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > Moon’s vote will become binding in 5 hours when 72

[DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Hi, We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community as GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apache Incubator. Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an easy to use Scala, SQL, and Python APIs for spatial data scientists to manage, wrangle,

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Noted below. I will leave others to add anything I’ve missed. On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Currently PiPy is not an ASF supported platform and you may have some > difficulty in complying with ASF policies. Are you aware of the trademark, > branding and other

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

com/jiayuasu> > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:46 PM Dave Fisher >> wrote: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> You note over 30 contributors to GeoSpark, but there are only 8 initial >>> committers. Has the move to the Apache Incubator been thoroughly discussed >&

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

u are > interested. > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling > > > On Jul 9, 2020, at 9:12 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community > as > > GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apa

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

ard to it! > > > > Jia Yu > > Ph.D. in Computer Science > > Arizona State University <http://www.asu.edu/> > > Reach me via: Homepage <http://jiayuasu.github.io/> | GitHub > <https://github.com/jiayuasu> > &

Re: [DISCUSS] project proposal - Apache Sedona

Any questions or concerns? If not, I can kick off the VOTE thread shortly. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:12 AM Felix Cheung wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to propose Apache Sedona, currently known in its community > as GeoSpark, as a new project under the Apache Incubator. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.4.0 RC2

+1 But a couple of things to follow up: mailing list link at the bottom of the web site seems to be broken - binary files are in the source package ./kubernetes/helm/pinot-0.2.0.tgz ./kubernetes/helm/pinot/charts/zookeeper-2.1.3.tgz ./kubernetes/helm/presto-0.2.0.tgz - ASF license header is

[VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

Hi, As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I would like to call for a vote to accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator. Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an easy to use Scala, SQL, and Python APIs for spatial data scientists to manage, wrangle, and process

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:19 AM Willem Jiang wrote: > +1 （binding) > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:49 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed the S

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

Hi, With 6 binding +1 votes, and no -1, to vote to accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator CLOSED and the vote has PASSED. [6] +1 Binding votes: - Jean-Baptiste Onofre - Dave Fisher - Kevin Ratnasekera - Furkan KAMACI - Willem Jiang - Felix Cheung [ 0 ] +0 Binding votes [ 0 ] -1 Binding votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

gt; that the next POC will pick it up. > > Thanks, > Jack > > On 2020/11/11 04:05:49, Felix Cheung wrote: > > +1 but > > > > it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source > release > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

+1 but it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source release https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/master/pinot-distribution/pinot-source-assembly.xml#L39 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 binding On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:21 AM Timothy Chen wrote: > +1 binding as well > > Tim > > Sent via Superhuman iOS > > > On Wed, Oct 21 2020 at 08:18, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > On 2020/10/19 17:29:23, Tianqi Chen wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

+1 (binding) Carry from dev@ On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:02 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to start a vote for the first release of Apache Sedona > 1.0.0-incubating rc1 > > Sedona community vote thread: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

it further > >> > > >> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pinot Project be and hereby is responsible > >> for the creation and maintenance of software related to distributed OLAP > >> data store to provide Real-time Analytics to power wide variety of > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Adding trademarks@ > > See https://prestodb.io/docs/current/connector.html > This is a great point but to be clear, that https://prestodb.io/ is the Presto project in the Presto Foundation,

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

To add, the thirdeye code directory was excluded from past releases and so was _not_ part of the Pinot project release. (A topic discussed several times on list) On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 4:54 PM Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > Hi Justin, > Thank you for bringing up the discussion aspect. It seems

Re: [MENTORS] Incubator report submitted

I can sign off Sedona. Will check to update whimsy now On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:57 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > The report has been submitted. > > The Sedona and Spot reports do not have sign-off by mentors, so please > sign off here [1] before the board meets. > > Thanks, > Justin > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1

+1 (binding) carry over from dev@ On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:17 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1 > > Sedona community vote thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

+1 On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 6:55 PM Sheng Wu wrote: > +1 binding, good luck > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > Justin Mclean 于2021年6月24日周四 上午9:46写道： > > > +1 all the best with the rest of your journey > > > > - > > To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

che APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > Jia Yu 于2021年2月4日周四 上午11:47写道： > > > Dear all, > > > > We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take > a > > look at our release when you have time. > > > > Thank yo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

Unfortunately this isn’t the right process for a podling release. As the mentor, I am sorry to see the release is not up to the standard upheld by previous releases. On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:02 AM kezhenxu94@apache wrote: > I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

my +1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> I propose that we run the vote anyway, thus ensuring IPMC oversight and > >> (post)approval, and then update the release runbook to make sure this > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

m IPMC was > missed before making the release. > > What is the right thing to do at this point? Should we cut another release > or can we go ahead with this and ensure that this does not happen again. > > thanks, > Kishore G > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:59 AM Felix Cheung > w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.10.0

+1 binding - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine you should include year 2021 in NOTICE - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:37 AM Kris Calvin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.1 RC0

Carry over my vote +1 binding On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:04 PM Fu Xiang wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.7.1. > > Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can > ingest data in realtime and serve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

; >> >> >> >> On 02/4/2021 11:47，Jia Yu wrote： >> Dear all, >> >> We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take a >> look at our release when you have time. >> >> Thank you very much! >> Jia >>

Re: [MENTORS] Report timeline for August

al queries at low > latency. > > Olivier Lamy > > Kishore Gopalakrishna > Jim Jagielski > Olivier Lamy > Felix Cheung > > > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Jul 31, 2021, at 9:22 PM, Justin Mcle

  1   2   >