Title: OT: Primary Name Server
Sorry for the OT post..but I have a question concerning DNS and primary nameservers
I have just had a conversation with someone at Network Solutions who has advised me that what I thought was our primary nameserver, the machine I have been editing my zone
Title: OT: Primary Name Server
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=todhunter.com
Its ns2.todhunter.com
Travis
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt
Sent: Friday,
September 10, 2004 6:05 AM
To:
Title: OT: Primary Name Server
Hmmm...whois saysyour nameservers
are
NS28.DUROCOM.COMNS29.DUROCOM.COMNS1.SECONDARY.COMNS2.SECONDARY.COMNS2.TODHUNTER.COM
And, according to
DNSStuff (http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=todhunter.com)
your primary is
NS2.TODHUNTER.COM
However,
I have just had a conversation with someone at Network Solutions who has
advised me that what I thought was our primary nameserver, the machine I
have been editing my zone files on for almost 2 years now, is not.
Step 1: Dump Network Solutions, unless you have a good reason to use
them. If
Title: OT: Primary Name Server
Walk,
no run away from Network NonSolutions.
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=todhunter.com
That proves they are wrong.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I am not clear on how this is happening but several times since installing
8.13 the webmail process seems to be clawing up all available cpu.
When this happens most other service connections start failing (like SMTP,
POP3 and IMAP).
Control Panel services stop and start (and that takes a while)
Scott,
Where did you find ns89.worldnic.com and ns90.worldnic.com? Do you know
something about ns28/29.durocom.com?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Primary
Just thought I'd provide a little info that took me two hours to figure out.
VirusScan 8.0 has a mass mailing prevention option under the Access
Protection in the control panel. If I try and telnet to any address on port
25 it redirects to my mail server on port 514. I'm not sure where it gets
the
Title: OT: Primary Name Server
What you use as your primary nameserver does not have to
be what your registrar thinks is your primary nameserver. Many people use
a nameserver not listed at the registrar as their primary.
I'm told that when a resolver contacts a root nameserver
it is the
Where did you find ns89.worldnic.com and ns90.worldnic.com? Do you know
something about ns28/29.durocom.com?
That is strange -- I can't reproduce it now. It looks like there was some
glitch somewhere. It's now showing ns1.secondary.com, ns2.secondary.com,
ns2.todhunter.com, ns28.durocom.com,
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=todhunter.comhttp://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=todhunter.com
It's ns2.todhunter.com
the soa has mname field as ns2.todhunter.com, but that field is manually
edited (errors), and not a technical proof that the primary is ns2 and
The reason I thought you might know something is that ns28/29.durocom.com
are in the same /24 subnet as the worldnic NSs you mentioned.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail
What you use as your primary nameserver does not have to be what your
registrar thinks is your primary nameserver.
Actually, to be a bit more technical, the registrar keeps a list of NS
records -- but does not distinguish between them in any way. So the *only*
way a registrar will know which
What you use as your primary nameserver does not have to be what your
registrar thinks is your primary nameserver. Many people use a nameserver
not listed at the registrar as their primary.
registrar/whois information do not show or define which NS is master or
slave, only the list of NS
Title: Message
Its ns2.todhunter.com
Thanks, I forget that they pay network solution
employees minimum wage.
That is what it's supposed to
be.
That's what I was getting but I'm half brain dead
from these hurricanes and wanted someone else to check.
That is strange -- I can't reproduce it now. It looks like there was some
glitch somewhere. It's now showing ns1.secondary.com, ns2.secondary.com,
ns2.todhunter.com, ns28.durocom.com, and ns29.durocom.com (with the primary
being ns2.secondary.com per the SOA record).
I finally was able to
ns2.todhunter.com has security vulnerability with unrestricted zone transfers:
Len, if you believe that someone has a security vulnerability that is
designed for gathering potentially sensitive information:
todhunter.com. 3600IN SOA ns2.todhunter.com.
Here's a modified version of Cris' script that moves files instead of
copying them (much more efficient...especially with large log files). It's
also set up to handle other log files you may have there. Change the
SpoolPath and LogPath for your system. I would schedule it a few minutes
after
Hi,
Our IMail server does not allow any relaying, but for temporary technical reasons i
have to switch
on relaying for the local host only. This means, internet sites installed on the same
server
should use IMail to send mails from the several contact forms.
Unfortunately, the old ColdFusion
Please do tell what is so horrible with NetSol? I've been using them for 6
or 7 years now, and have no complaints other than their pricing. I
currently manage 4 name servers with them as well as 30 domains and I
cannot think of one incident with them that pissed me off.
Sure every company
Someone asked for more information recently (sorry, I deleted the
message, so do not recall who it was or the exact question) and I just
came across this so I thought it may be helpful now or in the future:
Users can attach MIME-encoded and UUENCODE files to the mail message
and IMail Server will
I believe you should be using relay for addresses for best security
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Martin Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:48 AM
Subject: [IMail
Please do tell what is so horrible with NetSol?
Here is my list:
1. They are too expensive
2. They consistently try to push through rules and regulations that are bad
for the Internet and their competitors but are good for them
3. They try to deceive customers and ex-customers into believing
Please do tell what is so horrible with NetSol?
Here is my list:
1. They are too expensive
2. They consistently try to push through rules and regulations that are bad
for the Internet and their competitors but are good for them
3. They try to deceive customers and ex-customers into believing
I'm going to burn it down
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom
[Ipswitch]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] List working?
LOL
- Original Message -
From: Ron
ns2.todhunter.com has security vulnerability with unrestricted zone
transfers:
Len, if you believe that someone has a security vulnerability that is
designed for gathering potentially sensitive information:
no surprise, second guess my posts here, and if you had a clue what I was
talking
ns2.todhunter.com has security vulnerability with unrestricted zone
transfers:
Len, if you believe that someone has a security vulnerability that is
designed for gathering potentially sensitive information:
no surprise, second guess my posts here, and if you had a clue what I was
talking
Why is it that jackasses think they have to bring politics into a technical
list?
Please keep your stupid comments to yourself and try and stay on topic Len.
Regards,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 12:08:11 PM, Len wrote:
LC no surprise, second guess my posts here, and if you had a clue what I was
LC talking about, you'd be embarrassed at how stupid and ignorant you look
LC with you post total BS like this. But like, like our shrub-in-chief,
LC you're too
Len,
I don't mean to come between you and Scott's regular disagreements but I
for one generally consider that the phrase security vulnerability would
concern sensitive information.
I would also venture to guess that Scott probably knows the vulnerability
you are referring to but chose to use
Many, many people consider zone transfers to be a security risk.
duh, that's why I mentioned it.
Until you state otherwise, I still am assuming that you are referring to
the generic implied risk involved with zone transfers.
There are two risks, one real, and one that has been essentially
Well said, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: Primary Name Server
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 12:08:11 PM, Len wrote:
LC no surprise,
Pete, I am sure most of the people here agree with youas do I.
Cheers,
Gary
At 09:50 AM 9/10/2004, you wrote:
Well said, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re[2]:
Does Imail have SPF authentication capabilities?
Or does Ipwitch have plans to include SPF in Imail?
db
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Our IMail server does not allow any relaying, but for temporary
technical reasons i have to switch on relaying for the local host
only. This means, internet sites installed on the same server should
use IMail to send mails from the several contact forms.
Your server already relays
LEN, SHUT THE H**L UP WITH THE AGREESIVE TONE OF YOUR RESPONCES!
Neither you nor any one else has any right to come onto a public list and
start verbal tirade against some one.
You are an expert at DNS, yes, everyone knows that.
But your continued bad mouthing of others can not be continued to
Does Imail have SPF authentication capabilities?
Or does Ipwitch have plans to include SPF in Imail?
This is getting to be a very common question, as the October 1st deadline
for implementing SPF records quickly approaches.
IMail by itself does not have SPF support built into it, nor is it
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and SPF
Does Imail have SPF authentication capabilities?
Or does Ipwitch have plans to include SPF in Imail?
This is getting to
We are using Declude Junkmail Standard and we are really happy with the
product.
Does the Standard edition support SPF?
Yes, all three levels of Declude JunkMail (Lite, Standard, and Pro) have
the SPF support. You just need to be running v1.79 or later for the SPF
support, and need to add a
Does Imail have SPF authentication capabilities?
Or does Ipwitch have plans to include SPF in Imail?
This is getting to be a very common question, as the October 1st deadline
for implementing SPF records quickly approaches.
IMail by itself does not have SPF support built into it, nor is it
Does Imail have SPF authentication capabilities?
Or does Ipwitch have plans to include SPF in Imail?
This is getting to be a very common question, as the October 1st deadline
for implementing SPF records quickly approaches.
IMail by itself does not have SPF support built into it, nor is it
Is this kind of thing really necessary?
Since when does necessity, as defined by whomever, have anything to do
with this list?
Use the Delete key, Pete.
Or better yet, don't respond on list, take it up with me off-list.
Len
_
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 13:20:23, R. Scott Perry wrote:
This is getting to be a very common question, as the October 1st deadline
for implementing SPF records quickly approaches.
I must have missed the RFC or IETF announcement on this, can you give me
a reference?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is getting to be a very common question, as the October 1st deadline
for implementing SPF records quickly approaches.
I must have missed the RFC or IETF announcement on this, can you give me
a reference?
No RFC or IETF reference. It's Microsoft that is going to start testing
SPF records
I don't mean to come between you and Scott's regular disagreements but I
for one generally consider that the phrase security vulnerability would
concern sensitive information.
Expand your consideration to include denial of servic attack as a
security vulnerability.
ie, (I hate to spell this
Expand your consideration to include denial of servic attack as a
security vulnerability.
ie, (I hate to spell this basic stuff out, sorry if you know it).
No need to hate doing it -- it needed to be done. Thank you for explaining
the problem.
I personally treat this as either a my pipe is
LEN, SHUT THE H**L UP WITH THE AGREESIVE TONE OF YOUR RESPONCES!
My response to the topic of this thread was stating facts, and pointing out
two problems with her zone file.
BUT
Scott, as is his reflex, just had to try call me out, and he was dead wrong.
( btw, when I posted my original
Is there a certain command that one can send to listsrv that will filter out
replies from a certain subscriber, or would it just be best to add that
subscriber to a kill file?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
My mail server has the official host name of oms.domain.com. I have set up
an alias for this server to resolve to list.domain.com, so that all of the
mailing lists on this server are sent to that address. All of the lists are
working, no problem... But what I am seeing for the lists that are set
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 1:55:39 PM, Len wrote:
Is this kind of thing really necessary?
LC Since when does necessity, as defined by whomever, have anything to do
LC with this list?
LC Use the Delete key, Pete.
LC Or better yet, don't respond on list, take it up with me off-list.
off
My mail server has the official host name of oms.domain.com. I have set up
an alias for this server to resolve to list.domain.com, so that all of the
mailing lists on this server are sent to that address. All of the lists
are
working, no problem... But what I am seeing for the lists that are
Thanks David
Regards,
-Don
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and
those who don't.
===
Don Wolff- Technology Coordinator
Phoenix-Talent School District #4
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office- 541-535-0200
Mobile- 541-621-4717
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 15:30:06, Pete McNeil wrote:
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 1:55:39 PM, Len wrote:
LC Or better yet, don't respond on list, take it up with me off-list.
off list then.
Aw gee... and here I just went and popped a bowl of popcorn to sit back
and enjoy the show :-(
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:20
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and SPF
Does Imail have SPF authentication capabilities?
Or does Ipwitch have plans to include SPF in Imail?
This is
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:03
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and SPF
This is getting to be a very common question, as the October 1st
deadline
for implementing SPF records quickly
55 matches
Mail list logo
