Rod Dorman wrote the following on 11/5/2006 9:26 PM -0800:
On Saturday, November 4, 2006, 23:14:48, Matt wrote:
...Microsoft and SmarterMail seem to have
reinterpreted the RFC's to send the 550 error as soon as the message
goes over size,
Which is wrong.
and most
RMilner, you have been advised many times in past to turn off your return
receipt requests. Read Tripp's post from today - note that the only item in
bold text is item #5:
5. Turn off Return Receipt Requests in your mail client.
If you refuse to heed this request, please go elsewhere.
https://secure-messaging.siemensmedical.com
- Original Message -
From: Imail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] HIPAA
What solutions are y'all using for HIPAA compliance for your clients?
Mark
---
I reported this issue quite some time ago, when
Scott was still running the show, and never got a satisfactory answer. You
can scan the raw d*.smd file with f-prot and it will detect the virus, but run
it through Declude Virus, and the virus goes though undetected. After
pestering and
Kevin, check out https://secure-messaging.siemensmedical.com. If you want
more info, let me know.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:50 PM
Subject: [IMail
Weren't these issues addressed in 8.15 HF2? Here is what was fixed in HF2,
for both 8.15 8.2 verisons of IMail
(http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/releases/imail_professional/index.html):
IMail Server 8.15 Hotfix 2 - May 23, 2005
This hotfix fixes various IMAP4D32, SMTPD32, QUEUEMGR and
AVG, from Grisoft, provides a fee version for home
use. See http://free.grisoft.com
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Travis Rabe
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 10:11 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Free or
extremly cheap desktop AV
Try reinitializing LDAP and then see if it starts.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.2 on Windows NT Server
I just upgraded an NT 4.0 SP6a box to 8.2
Ken said he owned the address space (twice), most did not bother to confirm
or refute that statement before disregarding.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Landry IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: Re[2
Every one of the virus scanners I have tested with detect viruses inside of
.rar files:
=
Scanners detecting a virus: McAfee, F-Prot, Sophos, ClamAV, TrendMicro, AVG,
BitDefender.
Content-Type: application/octet-stream, size: 15355 B, name: 2332134.rar
(McAfee: INFECTED: W32/Bagle.bo
IMGate is simply Postfix, and yes it supports SSL/TLS, and SMTP Auth, as
well. But that's not what Len was getting at. With a front-end mail
gateway, things like virus scanning, spam filtering, and inbound/outbound
relaying can be off-loaded from the internal IMail server, thus allowing
more CPU
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to have IMail v8.14 block incoming SMTP connections
based on a DNS name instead
of an IP address? I have a list of DNS names from other internet
providers that should not be
running SMTP servers. I
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for all three replies. I'm afraid that while these solutions
would work for moving a single IP, it wouldn't work for multiple IP's.
I can send E-mail just fine from the base IP of the box, but I would
like to have separate
Depending on the format you want the output in, you can do something as
simple as:
egrep ^(To:|From:) imail\spool\spam\D*.SMD
You can get the sending ip address too, but you need to know where that
would be placed in the headers based on whether you have a gateway sitting
in front of your IMail
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam
Uh...apples and oranges... F-prot is not an anti-phishing product.
Evidently Clam has that feature. Since F-Prot does not,
F-Prot does indeed perform phenomenally for a non-daemonized virus scanner.
Even on Linux, when compared to daemonized scanners, F-Prot performs
exceptionally very well. However, with that said, I run the ClamAV daemon
(clamd) on our Linux servers and it is blazingly fast. If I were running it
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone out there using bitdefender with declude? I hate to be a pest
with all these questions, but I want to test it all the way.
I have BitDefender working with Declude Virus on a test server and it works
fine. Let me know
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill, if I could get those settings, it would save me a lot of time on the
testing. If you wouldn't mind that is. Thank you.
Here you go:
SCANFILE C:\PROGRA~1\COMMON~1\Softwin\BITDEF~1\bdc.exe /a /r /i /W /alev=5
/flev=3
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Althouth SpamAssassin is a conglomeration of tests - it is ultimately
a single test. W/Declude you have SpamAssassin thanks to Sandy [I'm
running SpamAssassin 3.01], Sniffer thanks to Pete, among many other
external tests
- Original Message -
From: Lee Zeltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I rarely post to this forum but lurk and read. We have used Imail for
many years and have had few problems, however the attitude displayed by
Ipswitch has forced us to consider moving on when our support agreement
is over. It
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Until all of the in-fighting over SPF, CALLER-ID (microsuck's name for
their
re-worked and re-launched version of SPF) is resolved and universally
adopted, the next best thing is CHALLENGE/RESPONSE.
The infighting has
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but there's 56 domains reporting Caller-ID. You can't count them
outg.
All things being equal, I'd say that SPF has become the defacto standard.
Even if Microsoft manages to pull one off here (which I doubt, as I'm sure
- Original Message -
From: x [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's also possible that spammers will also create a new SPF of their
own
until they are caught them create another. However, unless I really
don't
understand the dynamics of it all, at least SPF has the promise of
getting
this spam
- Original Message -
From: Bob McGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in the
past, and history has proven otherwise. In this instance, we
shall see...'
Here's one for you, HP discontinued a mid range platform(HP3000)
in 2000
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My feeling is that MS
trying to push Sender ID through is just an example of closing the
barn
door
after the cows have come home.
A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in the
past, and
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My feeling is that MS
trying to push Sender ID through is just an example of closing the
barn
door
after the cows have come home.
A lot of people have fallen victim to this same misguided belief in
the
- Original Message -
From: x [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tell you what I would like to see from declude, a hook into postfix to
replace amavisd-new (which hooks into SA and your AV) via the postfix
content_filter=, running on localhost.
amavisd-new is kind of ugly
If you say so. However,
Wow, thanks for providing this nice product analysis, Eric!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Eric Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:45 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] NEW SVC AGREEMENT PRICES - Please Read
Here is a brief assessment of
- Original Message -
From: Dan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I pinned it down some more. It's not a difference in the headers, it's
a
difference in the attached message. If it's html, then you don't see the
cover letter. If it's plain text, you do. However, it's not an
attachment
as
Looks good, but I don't see that is support SMTP Authentication, which would
be a requirement in our environment. Another nice to have feature is TLS
support. We already have both of these in our Linux/Postfix environments.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Larry Craddock [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just got off the phone with Ipswitch, and it is absolutely true -- IMail
will no longer be offered as a stand-alone product. This is the ultimate
in
arrogance, and shows a complete disregard for their existing customer
base.
I
- Original Message -
From: Dan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone tried to get SpamAssassin to work with IMail?
I couldn't get Declude to distinquish between SPF Unknown and SPF None so
I'm looking for something else. At least if SpamAssassin has a problem
like
that, I can fix it.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I found it on the IPSwitch siteg.
(http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-2517-DM01.htm)
Good luck trying to making that work. SA does not block mail on it's own,
so how do you propose to make IMail make the block/no
Although you can certainly do this with sed, why not use something much
simpler like tr, also included with the UNIX Utils? For example:
cat original.txt | tr -d new.txt
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004
Oh, and in case you really wanted to use sed:
sed s///g original.txt new.txt
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: UnxUtils SED help
Although you can certainly do
Disable the "nobody" alias.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Jeffery
Rehm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:00
AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail accepting
all mail
I seem to be having a major brain fart, because I don't
remember
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is very true, but the problem is that we don't know what people are
using out in the field and some of our NAV/SAV clients subscriptions are
out
of date and they no longer have the latest virus defs.
SMTP Auth will not
- Original Message -
From: john cesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. Simply a lot of spam.
What is the best way to tell? I examined the logs and looked at log
analysis reports.
Protocol Messages
1SMTPD 17,336
2SMTP 1,401
Well, from the high SMTPD count and low SMTP
- Original Message -
From: FreeSoft interactive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On many mail servers the following simple SMTP secured configuration is
possible:
1.- Relay is set to NO RELAY
2.- SMTP authentification is activated
2.- A trusted IP address list contains the list of all
- Original Message -
From: FreeSoft interactive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, I was effectively concerned about that specific point of return
address! So another set of questions is coming:
1.- to be able to relay mail from ASP forms, do I just have to add my IPs
in
the ADDRESSES list
- Original Message -
From: Barbara ONeal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually didn't get to complete this message.
When sending from the web things are working fine. And if i send to other
users within my domain things are ok.
however, If I send this to you thorugh a mail client I get errors
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is your mail server set to no mail relay? If it is, you need the
outlook
client to authenticate to the server. In outlook go to your properties
and
make sure that my outgoing server requires authentication and this
should
- Original Message -
From: Barbara ONeal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually set it up to relay mail for our webservers. And yes I do have
checked to authenticate against the server.
It is the same set up as our old system that was working fine.
only change was moving to Windows 2003
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have had our mail server set for relay for addresses and have had cases
where virus infected PC where relaying out our server. When we force the
clients to authenticate this stops these infected pcs from sending out
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:55 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Desperately need help.
Have you confirmed that the Microsoft smtp service is disabled?
Ah, yes, another good point...
Bill
To
Folks, I would like to announce the availability of a new IP4R database that
includes a blacklist, whitelist, suspicious list, and a neutral list (IP
address' that have not been classified). Here is the breakdown on the list
usage:
Service hostname: pub.senderdb.net
127.0.0.2 Black List
- Original Message -
From: Dan Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A little more history about the company providing these new lists:
http://www.peacefire.org/censorware/CYBERsitter/
I'd think long and hard before using them.
Wow, talk about old news! But like anything, use at your own
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm interested in this SURBL list mentioned below. I searched the
archives for SURBL and come up empty.
Check out: http://www.surbl.org/
Bill
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
- Original Message -
From: Rod Dorman
IMHO propagation is the wrong term altogether irregardless of what
definition one attributes to it. The real question is When will all the
incorrect cached values die off?
Okay, just to poke a little fun at this whole thread (from American
- Original Message -
From: Langston, Cale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will Declude plug-in with Trend Micro Server Protect? I saw the list of
compatible scanners and noticed PCScan was listed (now known as
PC-cillin I think). However, PC-cillin is a client piece and not a server
side client.
- Original Message -
From: Marc A. Funaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We're in the process of determining how our hosting services would
be affected by moving from a Windows-based platform to Red Hat 9.
One of the major difficulties is finding an iMail-like email server for
Linux, in the
- Original Message -
From: Neil Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our current iMAIL DB is in MS Access. We are going to migrate from Access
to SQL this weekend. Besides the articles on the knowledge base are there
any gotchas that we need to be concerned about?
One thing to be aware of with
- Original Message -
From: A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Dewlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 13:48
Subject: [IMail Forum] Microsoft DNS issues
Are there any issues with DNS and Windows 2003 and IMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Dep. Informatica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detect Spoofed Email Addresses
With support for Sender Policy Framework (SPF) MDaemon can help defend
against spoofed email addresses. Spoofing is when a sender attempts to
mask his or her identity by making the message
The information below only applies to the DNS Client that runs by default
on all W2K and WinXP machines. We disable this service on all machines
(servers and client computers) as it only causes problems. For those
running MS DNS Server, the registry change you want to make is under:
Hive:
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information below only applies to the DNS Client that runs by
default
on all W2K and WinXP machines. We disable this service on all machines
(servers and client computers) as it only causes problems. For those
running MS
- Original Message -
From: Eddie Cornejo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible for IMGate to know about valid accounts on the Imail Server
in order stem the tide of dictionary attacks. I see that vamsoft can do it
via AD, but I'm using an external SQL database. Both solutions sound
- Original Message -
From: RMilner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And guess what? You have HIPA laws that you must follow. Our lawyers
require
any outgoing mail to have return receipts, no exceptions. As emails are
subpoenaed more and more, expect to be required to do the same, whether
the
Will IPSwitch please consider removing RMilner from the IMail list. Over
the past few weeks he has been asked several times by different list members
to turn off return receipts before posting to the list. In that timeframe,
IPSwitch has also posted its list etiquette rules to this list at least
- Original Message -
From: Keif Gwinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Request to IPSwitch to please remove RMilner from
the IMail
I also find return receipts annoying.
More annoying than top posting and out of
- Original Message -
From: RMilner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Considering I even wrote a one line rule for you to delete all my
messages,
I'd love to see how you cry to spammers to take you off their email lists
instead of doing what would take you 5 seconds in a cut and paste.
I see you
- Original Message -
From: isp-lists [at] beachcomp dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PEOPLE
How is this in any way an Imail technical issue?
If you have a problem like this, TAKE IT OFFLINE and quit wasting other
peoples valuable time.
If you are so concerned that someone would read
Please turn of the read receipts!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: RMilner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] URL Blacklists - Don't post spam to the
list
When someone gives me diatribes about DNSBL's that were
Second request: RMilner, please turn off the read receipts! Did you not
read the list server etiquette e-mail that IPSwitch posted to the list
earlier today?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: RMilner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: RE:
We provide HIPAA compliant mail services to our healthcare customers. This
can be provided as a turnkey solution, a gateway solution, or as ASP
services. To find out more, go to:
https://secure-messaging.siemensmedical.com.
Contact me off-list if you would like more info.
Regards,
Bill Landry
- Original Message -
From: Greg Cerveny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've spent a little bit thinking about smtp and smtpd after reading this:
http://www.declude.com/info/logs.htm
And now I have a few questions on the topic:
Does smtpd mean smtp daemon?
Yes.
Is smtpd a device that listens
8.05 Hotfix 2 Details:
- Fixes a possible LDAP Denial of Service vulnerability
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Fw: iMail 8.05 LDAP service remote exploit
-
8.05 Hotfix 2 Details:
- Corrects a peering problem and an issue with long host names in the Queue
Manager.
- Fixes a possible LDAP Denial of Service vulnerability
- Includes 8.05 Hotfix 1 updates
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ClamAV is a free, open-source virus scanner for UNIX/Linux OSs, and we run
it on our Linux/Postfix gateways. It was updated to catch Mydoom before
several of our commercial scanners. But, true, it's hard to find anything
free for the Windows environment.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
If you grab the Win32 unix utilities from http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/,
you will be able to parse your log files any way you would like. And they
are very fast, as well.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Mike Callahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 22,
- Original Message -
From: KathyJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was kinda hoping for a utility program that would allow me to do this
without opening each one in notepad. :\
Kathy, if you go out and grab the free Win32 UNIX utilities at:
http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/, you can then run a
- Original Message -
From: Burzin Sumariwalla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking at implementing SPF (spf.pobox.com), and reading through the
SPF FAQ I came across the following:
You should support SASL AUTH on ports 25 and 587.
When your users
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, I am noticing more often situations where Declude headers are
missing
from delivered messages, and from several different senders. So I still
believe this is a Declude issue and not a corrupted or malformed mail
issue.
Title: 8.05- Declude not seen..
Kami, I also periodically see messages without any
Declude headers, however I find that the messages were processed by Declude
because all of the normal log entries appear in the log filefor the
messages. I reported see this several months ago, but the
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check your logs to see if these messages are actually getting processed
or
not. I suspect that they are being processed by Declude and that for
some
reason Declude cannot place it's headers in the message.
FYI, the E-mails
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are these possibly headers that were added
with older versions of IMail, but not with 8.0 versions, which is what I
am
running?
If that's the case, then we still have a problem with Declude not placing
its headers in certain
Hey Mark, very nice scripting job here. I modified your batch file
slightly, due to the fact that I use sysmmdd.txt instead of logmmdd.txt.
But this sure makes troubleshooting and locating the IMail log file entries
for a specific d*.smd file very simple, indeed.
Thanks for sharing this!
Bill
Hey John, just wanted to say nice work on this MS licensing issue. The
results of your research were very well presented and all of your responses
to the different protestations very well reasoned.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Also, if you are using the Queue Manager "DNS
Cache" feature, I would recommend disabling it, it caused similar problems for
us until we disabled it, and no problems sense (for at least 6
months).
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Bilbee
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Len, I always learn some new tricks from reviewing your scripts! A couple
of minor corrections below.
Here's one that will output to a file all the IPs that connected to your
Imail today more than 50 times (wraps)
gawk
- Original Message -
From: Mike Nice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After about 3 weeks with no problem, the Queue manager hung and 1000's of
messages began accumulating in the spool directory. I tried to stop the
service, but it didn't respond to the service control manager. I forced
it
to
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following is a list of tests that we run against the E-mails arriving
at the spamtraps, and what percentage of the spam they caught (it may be
easier to read if you use a fixed-width font):
COMPU
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following is a list of tests that we run against the E-mails
arriving
at the spamtraps, and what percentage of the spam they caught (it may be
easier to read if you use a fixed-width font):
COMPU
Yes, actually a lot of people use the rfc-ignorant blacklists, including me.
I would suggest that if you do not want to stay listed in the rfc-ignorant
dsn database, that you start accepting null sender messages, as the RFCs
specify, otherwise you will find more and more of your messages being
- Original Message -
From: Karen D. Oland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope, Sandy is correct, it checks to confirm that the sender's e-mail
address is local. However, since anyone can forge a sender's e-mail
address, it does not prevent you from being an open relay, and
thus why its
Check the descriptions of the many tests available at
http://www.declude.com/Junkmail/support/ip4r.htm and try some of the more
conservative ones.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Ken Imail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:03 PM
Subject: RE:
- Original Message -
From: Karen D. Oland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Sanford Whiteman
So, he is asking why IMail cannot so a simple check of any From
address that claims to be from a local domain, and if the account
does not exist and is not an alias, then reject the
Thanks for the heads-up Len! This is some nasty stuff! I certainly hope
something can be done about these DDOS attacks that are being targeted
against DNSBLs.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:52 PM
Well, this makes it official, regretfully monkeys.com is now gone.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Ronald F. Guilmette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: BLOCK,MISC: MONKEYS.COM: Now retired from spam fighting
It is with deep
Kami, if you remove the nobody alias from your hosted domains, then IMail
will simply refuse to accept delivery for non-existent users with a 550 no
such user and neither IMail nor Declude will have to do any processing for
these messages.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Kami Razvan
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] No user in local domain?
Kami, if you remove the nobody alias from your hosted domains, then
IMail
will simply refuse
is
invalid as a local domain. So someone can not have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in their from address and send me
email.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Did you also move the corresponding Q*.smd files
into the queue, as well? If not, you will need to do that before the
messages will get delivered. Otherwise, they will be viewed as orphaned
files.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Chris
Andrews
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure how easy it would be to recreate the
Q*.smd files, but if you check to see what the format is, you may be about to
write a script to recreate them from the D*.smd files.
Good luck!
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Chris
Andrews
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would suggest checking out http://www.declude.com/Junkmail/support/ip4r.htmfor
information about the DNSBLs you have listed here, as well as many
others.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
btw, apparently the registrars/registry operators for other .TLDs have
been
raping their DNS for months, so you can nullify their TLD shenanigans also
by the declaring all of them as zone type delegation-only. In fact, I
can't
Len, it's not that you cannot use:
zone com { type delegation-only; };
zone net { type delegation-only; };
zone ac { type delegation-only; };
zone cc { type delegation-only; };
zone cx { type delegation-only; };
zone museum { type delegation-only; };
zone nu { type delegation-only; };
zone sh {
: [IMail Forum] thank you, thank you, Verisign!! and BIND9
Verisign-rape patch
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 16:49:13, Bill Landry wrote:
Len, it's not that you cannot use:
zone com { type delegation-only; };
...
zone ws { type delegation-only; };
I was just pointing out
Have your T-1 provider take a look at the circuit while trying to upload and
download a file and see if they are logging any errors. Over the past 7
years we have had three different T-1s from different providers have issues
with one-way traffic, and each time it was a problem on the T-1 circuit
This is not new, spammer have been doing this for at least a year now.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: B.H. Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] new spam technique
Check this spam message: Notice how they have
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
