I'd like to record a fix, of sorts, for a missing menu bar in
Frescobaldi under a rather specific combination of circumstances. It
might help someone. Possibly future-me!
I run Frescobaldi on an Ubuntu 22.04 system, with an Apple-Mac-OS-X-
like KDE theme that puts the menus of the currently
I can confirm the same problem. Just installed macports and frescobaldi port
and it launches only via terminal. Double clicking on the .app (inside the
apps/macports folder) returns a general launch error with py2app. Once launched
via terminal, frescobaldi works great, though.
> El 10 m
yes, I am sure. This is the frescobaldi.app under the
/Applications/MacPorts folder. I've cleaned all older versions before
installing with Mac Port
Xavier
Le 10/05/24 à 17:37, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
I've freshly installed Frescobaldi using mac port. When lauching the
frescobaldi.app
> I've freshly installed Frescobaldi using mac port. When lauching the
> frescobaldi.app,
Are you sure that this is the Frescobaldi that was installed by MacPorts?
It rather sounds like the (buggy) .app distributed in the Frescobaldi
releases. I think the MacPorts-installed Frescobaldi
for Frescobaldi-stuff.
Especially if you have background in Python!
~Steph
> Regarding MacOs porting, a valid alternative would be to run
> the linux version of Frescobaldi from a Docker container
Perhaps, but from the perspective of building .app bundles, that replaces
a headache (shipping Qt, PyQt, Poppler and python-poppler-qt5) with what
sounds like an even
Regarding MacOs porting, a valid alternative would be to run the linux
version of Frescobaldi from a Docker container
A Dockerfile like this one
FROM ubuntu
RUN apt update-yq&& apt install-y frescobaldi pulseaudio&& apt clean-y
RUN mkdir -p/Users//Scores
WORKDIR /U
> I'm an intermediate-level python programmer but I might be able to help with
> busy work like typing and documenting functions, with some feedback. Anything
> to give back to a project that I use all the time!
Thanks. However, without wanting to stop you from contributing, I'll reiterate
that
folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> might benefit from a more object-oriented design. It's definitely in
> Python, but with more of C-style approach. You've worked on it, you know
> what I'm talking about.
Le lundi 06 mai 2024 à 14:05 +, Steph Phillips a écrit :
> Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other
> folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> might benefit fro
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 7:06 AM Steph Phillips
wrote:
> Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other
> folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
>
> After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
> might benefit from a more
Well, I'm glad you asked about feedback because I'm curious what other
folks who contribute to Frescobaldi might think.
After digging around in the codebase, I'm wondering if the application
might benefit from a more object-oriented design. It's definitely in
Python, but with more of C-style
> Hey all, I've been looking over the Frescobaldi codebase for the last
> few days, and it seems to be within the realm of something I could pick
> up maintenance for.
>
> There would definitely be a learning curve, so hopefully it doesn't
> reach it's EOL too soon... Bu
Steph,
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Steph Phillips
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 11:46 PM
To: Jean Abou Samra ; Graham King
; N. Andrew Walsh
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re[2]: Frescobaldi?
Hey all
> I’m wondering if the Frescobaldi approach is actually working out. Keep in
> mind that originally Frescobaldi was just a project for adding support for
> Lilypond to KATE, then it became a KDE parts solution, then it started to do
> everything itself for more control. And this
An LSP server for lilypond would be awesome! I'm using it all the time for
coding in neovim, and it's a total game changer.
Best,
Kenneth
Valentin Petzel, May 06, 2024 at 15:23:
> I’m wondering if the Frescobaldi approach is actually working out. Keep in
> mind that originally Fresc
I’m wondering if the Frescobaldi approach is actually working out. Keep in
mind that originally Frescobaldi was just a project for adding support for
Lilypond to KATE, then it became a KDE parts solution, then it started to do
everything itself for more control. And this means you’ll need
Hey all, I've been looking over the Frescobaldi codebase for the last
few days, and it seems to be within the realm of something I could pick
up maintenance for.
There would definitely be a learning curve, so hopefully it doesn't
reach it's EOL too soon... But, I don't know, I feel pretty
> The technical stuff is way over my head, but this reads like the top-
> level description of a GSOC project (in case the mentioned friend
> doesn't take the bait)...
GSoC projects are nice for doing focused work on some specific part
of the code base. For overhauling just about everything,
to
lilypond in fragmenting its user experience. At the moment, we can
just say to new users "choose Frescobaldi; it's the best and most
popular IDE, and it's really easy to install" confident that any
questions that arise will likely be understood and answered readily.
On Sun, 2024-04-2
My very first contribution :-) Nice!
Colin Campbell, May 04, 2024 at 02:51:
> Thanks again for the text, Ken! I've put it up for review along with a
> bunch of housekeeping bits, and it could get merged into the
> documentation mid-week. You'll be able to point to your contribution to
>
Thanks again for the text, Ken! I've put it up for review along with a
bunch of housekeeping bits, and it could get merged into the
documentation mid-week. You'll be able to point to your contribution to
LilyPond!
Cheers,
Colin
On 2024-05-01 22:33, Kenneth Flak wrote:
OK, giving it a
-click two-way, like Frescobaldi, or from PDF to code only?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin
>
> On 2024-05-01 22:33, Kenneth Flak wrote:
> > OK, giving it a shot... Feel free to edit as needed!
> >
> > Kenneth
> >
> >
> > Neovim
&
Sounds like just the VSLilyPond-PDF-Preview extension is not being
maintained. I'll take a look at that tonight...thanks, Federico!
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:41 PM Federico Sarudiansky
wrote:
> Hi Jeff.
>
> I've been using VSLilypond for VSCode for a while now and I found a
> solution for the
line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Colin Campbell)
2. Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Kenneth Flak)
(Jeff Kopmanis)
3. Re: \after … \beforeLast? (Pierre-Luc Gauth
Hi Jeff.
I've been using VSLilypond for VSCode for a while now and I found a
solution for the annoying lack of refresh of the PDF output. It is here:
https://github.com/lhl2617/VSLilyPond-PDF-preview/pull/118
Basically you have to edit a file of the Lilypond PDF preview extension
universe for good in favor of Linux. But this combo worked
very well for me, and both programs are still around, so that one can
safely assume that it still is an option today.
It is just good to know there are alternatives to Frescobaldi, and it
would be convenient to have them mentioned in one place
and clicking on text and asking for it to find it in the PDF worked as
well. Syntax highlighting and completion worked nicely as well as the
formatting. Compiling worked nicely, although in some cases, my files
generate some warnings that Frescobaldi did not. I suspect different
compile options
This looks really good, Ken. I'm going to do a general tidy up on the
Easier Editing page, but I hope to have something up for review in a day
or two. I've installed neovim, but to save a bit of time: is the
point-and-click two-way, like Frescobaldi, or from PDF to code only?
Cheers,
Colin
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Raphael Mankin)
2. Re: \after … \beforeLast? (Knute Snortum)
3. Re: Frescobaldi... panic alternatives? (Kenneth Flak)
4. Re: \after … \beforeLast? (Hans Aikema)
5. Re: \after … \beforeLast? (Lukas-Fa
Glad to hear that the description is useful for you!
I agree, the website is not great at onboarding new users...
Best,
Kenneth
Raphael Mankin, May 02, 2024 at 20:07:
> This is a much better description of Neovim than exists on any of the
> Neovim web-sites. They all jump straight into detail
This is a much better description of Neovim than exists on any of the
Neovim web-sites. They all jump straight into detail without telling one
what the whole thing is about. I struggled to work out what Neovim is,
or why I should want to use it.
On 02/05/2024 05:33, Kenneth Flak wrote:
OK,
OK, giving it a shot... Feel free to edit as needed!
Kenneth
Neovim
https://neovim.io
Neovim is a minimal text editor and fork of vim. It is highly extensible and
configurable through the vimscript and lua programming languages. Lilypond
support is provided by the nvim-lilypond-suite plugin
>> Maybe one of you two can provide some text for
>>
>>https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/web/easier-editing
>
> It happens that my first contribution to the Lilypond documentation
> was a rewrite of the Easier Editing section, some 14 years ago or
> so.
Aaah :-)
> If either or
On 2024-05-01 12:38, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Maybe one of you two can provide some text for
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/web/easier-editing
It happens that my first contribution to the Lilypond documentation was
a rewrite of the Easier Editing section, some 14 years ago or
> Yes, I also use that combo. It's fantastic, but you'd have to be
> willing to invest some time to climb the admittedly steep learning
> curve of (neo)vim. However, it's a time investment that pays off
> massively, so I recommend it heartily!
Maybe one of you two can provide some text for
;lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest...&
' to
lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Fw: Frescobaldi
Paolo,
Thank you.
Mark
From: Paolo Prete
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 1:08 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?
You'll find all you need at the main page:
https://github.com/paopre/Spontini
Cheers
On Tue
gt;
>
>
> *From:* lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
> *On Behalf Of *Paolo
> Prete
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2024 12:58 PM
> *To:* Dirck Nagy ; lilypond-user
> *Subject:* Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?
>
>
>
> FYI I just made a n
Paolo,
Installation instructions?
Learning/notation manual?
I want to try it.
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Paolo Prete
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 12:58 PM
To: Dirck Nagy ; lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic
Apr 30, 2024 at 6:45 AM Dirck Nagy wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible disappearance
>> from Mac is causing me to panic. Jean, I did not realize that you were the
>> last person to seriously work on Frescobaldi / M
On 2024-04-30 10:05 am, Karlin High wrote:
On 4/30/2024 10:25 AM, Jennifer Doering wrote:
What happened to the Frescobaldi dev? Just doesn't have time to
maintain it anymore?
Link to past discussion:
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-11/msg00131.html>
His so
On 4/30/2024 10:25 AM, Jennifer Doering wrote:
What happened to the Frescobaldi dev? Just doesn't have time to maintain
it anymore?
Link to past discussion:
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2022-11/msg00131.html>
His software development activity appears reduced
What happened to the Frescobaldi dev? Just doesn't have time to maintain it
anymore?
Hi all,
There are various alternatives around at least for Linux users, but
there will certainly be different ones available for the Mac users as
well. And who knows: maybe Frescobaldi will survive after all. And if
it may stop working one day, it is good to know that at least you
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:45 AM Dirck Nagy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible disappearance
> from Mac is causing me to panic. Jean, I did not realize that you were the
> last person to seriously work on Frescobaldi / Mac.
>
>
&g
VS Code also provide point and click. Snippets and wizards are tipical features
for any other programming language in VS Code. It should not be too difficult
to write them for lilypond.
I understand that it can be difficult to find the developers and mantainers to
keep Frescobaldi runnig
> FYI, what I like the most about Frescobaldi are:
>
> * Templates and wizards
> * Snippets
> * Point and Click selection
> * Syntax highlighting
>
> If Frescobaldi for Mac does indeed vanish, what are my alternatives for a
> Lilypond editor?
Syntax highlightin
> With not too much work, you could get emacs to do all of that I
> think.
Well, it would be great if someone could convert the LilyPond mode of
Emacs so that it uses the new 'tree-sitter' interface:
https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/
(look at the 'Playground' link to get a feeling
With not too much work, you could get emacs to do all of that I think. But
my guess is that there's no reason to panic yet. I don't see frescobaldi
magically disappearing.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 10:45 PM Dirck Nagy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its
Hi all
Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible disappearance from
Mac is causing me to panic. Jean, I did not realize that you were the last
person to seriously work on Frescobaldi / Mac.
I use Mac exclusively, and Frescobaldi / Lilypond is very important to me.
FYI
emely old-skool sourceforge hosting)
>
> 2. Is there any benefit/interest in trying to duplicate the most
> important/useful functionality of Frescobaldi (e.g. two-way point-and-click
> navigation) into a LaTeX-based IDE?
>
TexStudio let's you right-click the pdf output and select
Hi all,
> Fortunately for me, I'm using lualatex already, so that worked. I do indeed
> lose point-and-click, but it's good to know that if frescobaldi stops working
> I at least have a backup.
I’ve been considering moving fully to *lula*tex ever since Urs demonstrated his
lyluatex
so that worked. I do
indeed lose point-and-click, but it's good to know that if frescobaldi
stops working I at least have a backup. Thanks for the help!
N. Andrew Walsh
er/ihn/ihm/sein | he/him/his
Berlin
> yeah, I just had the package-manager in gentoo downgrade to the previous
> version of snappy, and then filed a bug with gentoo. It's a workaround for
> now.
>
> As another workaround, I'm trying to get my latex editor to use lilypond-book,
> but since it's on a nonstandard path, I don't seem
Hi Jean,
yeah, I just had the package-manager in gentoo downgrade to the previous
version of snappy, and then filed a bug with gentoo. It's a workaround for
now.
As another workaround, I'm trying to get my latex editor to use
lilypond-book, but since it's on a nonstandard path, I don't seem able
> It gets a bit more complicated now. See this bug:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=278633
>
> That bug is for freeBSD, but I expect it applies to other
> distros as well (it certainly applies to gentoo, as I'm
> getting the exact same error). In short, snappy (an archiver)
>
pro.se
>
> 29 apr. 2024 kl. 11:40 skrev Robert Garrigos :
>
> I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (not working), so I went for Visual
> Studio Code, with some lilypond plugins, and I have to say that it offers
> everything I need
>
> Robert
>
> El 28 abr. 2024,
manually :-(
> I myself am a Linux user (Mint), and so far Frescobaldi is still running
> flawlessly.
> And - another question out of curiosity: Could it be a workaround (if
> Qt5 would be officially retired and no longer be available in the repos
> of the "big" distros like
I use it on Sonoma without issues.
Med vänlig hälsning / Kind regards
Mats-Olof Liljegren
e-pro
Oskarsvägen 11B
702 14 Örebro
Tel 070 360 19 19
e-post m...@e-pro.se
web: http://e-pro.se
> 29 apr. 2024 kl. 11:40 skrev Robert Garrigos :
>
> I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (no
I cannot use Frescobaldi on Mac Sonoma (not working), so I went for Visual
Studio Code, with some lilypond plugins, and I have to say that it offers
everything I need
Robert
> El 28 abr. 2024, a les 13:57, Jean Abou Samra va
> escriure:
>
>> Is Frescobaldi the most commo
to version 1.2.0 a few days ago,
and it contains symbols that aren't defined in earlier versions. So
qtwebengine-5* will fail on systems with older versions of qtwebengine but
newer versions of snappy. My error message is this:
--
$ frescobaldi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "
Would it maybe make things a bit easier to leave the whole MacOS
business aside and take care of the Linux-specific stuff first? And
what actually about Windows - out of curiosity. I myself am a Linux
user (Mint), and so far Frescobaldi is still running flawlessly.
And - another question out
> […]
> Well, the explanation wasn't that brief. Sorry that I didn't have
> time to write a shorter one, as they say.
PS: Maybe I should mention that at the time I went down the rabbit
hole of Python packaging in general because of Frescobaldi, I wrote
two articles on the LinuxFR site,
> unfortunately, as I noted above, the problem seems to be that frescobaldi
> depends on a now-deprecated version of qtwebengine, and without updating
> it we'll eventually reach a point where it no longer runs. I looked into
> this because qtwebengine-5.15 failed to compile o
y at 200Mbps for some reason?!)
> — and I’m happy to put a machine on a DMZ for external access.
>
> Is there anything, non-programming-wise, I can do to help the cause?
Currently, I don't have the time or honestly the stamina to work on
Frescobaldi again, but if anyone does tackle
> Just had a quick look. It seems to me we need to create a python-poppler-qt6,
> port qpageview to Qt6 and of course frescobaldi itself. I would hope that
> qpageview and frescobaldi both basically mean moving from PyQt5 to PyQt6 which
> I expect to be mostly busy work. The poppler b
> Thanks, but unfortunately the kind of work needed is deeply technical, not
> busy work.
>
Just had a quick look. It seems to me we need to create a python-poppler-qt6,
port qpageview to Qt6 and of course frescobaldi itself. I would hope that
qpageview and frescobaldi both basic
> I understood that. I was responding in particular to Jean’s comment
>
> > NB: I don't own a macOS machine, which of course makes all testing very
> difficult
>
> but also offering the hardware for use in whatever way it might be helpful
> (e.g., compilation, not just testing).
>
> Cheers,
>
Hi,
> unfortunately, as I noted above, the problem seems to be that frescobaldi
> depends on a now-deprecated version of qtwebengine, and without updating it
> we'll eventually reach a point where it no longer runs.
I understood that. I was responding in particular to Jean’s comment
Hi All,
The Qt5 dependency seems a much more serious and important issue than the
packaging for macOS. Although an app bundle installer is most desirable for
ordinary macOS users, there are alternatives such as MacPorts and Homebrew. I’m
currently running Frescobaldi from the latest source
Hi Kieren,
unfortunately, as I noted above, the problem seems to be that frescobaldi
depends on a now-deprecated version of qtwebengine, and without updating it
we'll eventually reach a point where it no longer runs. I looked into this
because qtwebengine-5.15 failed to compile on my machine
Hi all,
>> If there is busy work that needs to be done on the project, I can do that,
>> but I also don't own a Mac.
I own a bunch of Macs. In fact, right here in my studio I have two late-2014
Mac Minis with fresh Monterey installs which are completely unused. I also have
a *really*
> If there is busy work that needs to be done on the project, I can do that, but
> I also don't own a Mac.
Thanks, but unfortunately the kind of work needed is deeply technical, not busy
work.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 4:15 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Doing some system updates today, I see that frescobaldi is the only
> program that requires PyQtWebEngine:5, which in turn requires
> qtwebengine:5. Looking at the frescobaldi page, I see a somewhat concerning
> note that
> Is Frescobaldi the most common tool on Linux, or what do the majority of
> Lilypond users use?
Frescobaldi is the most common LilyPond editor, on all OSes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I use Frescobaldi on all of my Macs with slightly different operating systems.
It works well, but I'm concerned about the future. Unfortunately, I'm not a
programmer, so I can't contribute with coding. This is exciting, perhaps a bit
too exciting, considering how we'll be able to continue
> Doing some system updates today, I see that frescobaldi is the only program
> that requires PyQtWebEngine:5, which in turn requires qtwebengine:5. Looking
> at the frescobaldi page, I see a somewhat concerning note that the project is
> on the verge of being unmaintained, due to thi
Hi List,
Doing some system updates today, I see that frescobaldi is the only program
that requires PyQtWebEngine:5, which in turn requires qtwebengine:5.
Looking at the frescobaldi page, I see a somewhat concerning note that the
project is on the verge of being unmaintained, due
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:59 AM Hajo Baess wrote:
> I have (just completely accidentally, with a little help from the
> Breeze theme color scheme) discovered a keyboard shortcut for switching
> back and forth between the editor and the Music View. I think that it
> is undocumented, and strange
work...
>
> No mouse needed.
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 13.02.2024 um 13:24 -0600 schrieb Guy Stalnaker:
> > I do not see such a toggle or any system call in the Key Shortcuts
> > preferences that seems relevant. And perhaps that is not surprising -
> > Frescobaldi is afte
rising -
> Frescobaldi is after all a code editor; that it assumes (!) one would
> always want the code visible makes sense to me.
>
> Regards
>
> On 2/12/24 15:36, Hajo Baess wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Maybe I am missing it alltogether or it does not exi
Maybe I was not clear enough in what I said: Of course the code should
be visible all the time. What I mean is the following:
When you have Frescobaldi open with its split window, there is always
one of the two halves active and reacts to input. Say, you are in the
editor, but want to go
I do not see such a toggle or any system call in the Key Shortcuts
preferences that seems relevant. And perhaps that is not surprising -
Frescobaldi is after all a code editor; that it assumes (!) one would
always want the code visible makes sense to me.
Regards
On 2/12/24 15:36, Hajo Baess
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 1:37 PM Hajo Baess wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Maybe I am missing it alltogether or it does not exist or it is to hard
> to find for me:
> I am looking for a keyboard shortcut in Frescobaldi enabling me to
> toggle between editor and music view, so I do
Hello all,
Maybe I am missing it alltogether or it does not exist or it is to hard
to find for me:
I am looking for a keyboard shortcut in Frescobaldi enabling me to
toggle between editor and music view, so I do not have to click with
the mouse.
I just can't find it. I have tried all kinds
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:57 AM Hans Aikema
wrote:
>
> I've created an issue for Frescobaldi and I should be able to start work
> on it today.
>
> https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/172
>
>
> Knute, you've missed a digit while copying the link and
On 15 Jan 2024, at 19:40, Knute Snortum wrote:On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 7:47 AM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
Calling
git grep "override[^=]*#'[a-z]"
in the current Frescobaldi source tree delivers _way_ too many hits. I
don't consider it sane that the current Fresc
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 7:47 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Calling
>
> git grep "override[^=]*#'[a-z]"
>
> in the current Frescobaldi source tree delivers _way_ too many hits. I
> don't consider it sane that the current Frescobaldi will pump out
> pre-2.18
Knute Snortum writes:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:28 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Bernhard Kleine writes:
>>
>> > Dear David,
>> >
>> > the file was created this morning from frescobaldi with the
>> > Partitur-Assistent and the pre-set
Bernhard Kleine writes:
> Am 15.01.2024 um 14:28 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Bernhard Kleine writes:
>>
>>> Dear David,
>>>
>>> the file was created this morning from frescobaldi with the
>>> Partitur-Assistent and the pre-set version of Lilypo
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:28 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> Bernhard Kleine writes:
>
> > Dear David,
> >
> > the file was created this morning from frescobaldi with the
> > Partitur-Assistent and the pre-set version of Lilypond was 2.25.7.
> > Nothing was done
Am 15.01.2024 um 14:28 schrieb David Kastrup:
Bernhard Kleine writes:
Dear David,
the file was created this morning from frescobaldi with the
Partitur-Assistent and the pre-set version of Lilypond was 2.25.7.
Nothing was done be myself apart from wrinting notes and lyrics.
If the "Par
Bernhard Kleine writes:
> Dear David,
>
> the file was created this morning from frescobaldi with the
> Partitur-Assistent and the pre-set version of Lilypond was 2.25.7.
> Nothing was done be myself apart from wrinting notes and lyrics.
If the "Partitur-Assistent"
Dear David,
the file was created this morning from frescobaldi with the
Partitur-Assistent and the pre-set version of Lilypond was 2.25.7.
Nothing was done be myself apart from wrinting notes and lyrics.
Am 15.01.2024 um 13:06 schrieb David Kastrup:
Bernhard Kleine writes:
The following MWE
Bernhard Kleine writes:
> The following MWE gave a warning
>
> C:/Users/bk/AppData/Local/Temp/frescobaldi-n7fp9iem/tmp_isr57mt/document.ly:52:25:
> Warnung: deprecated: missing `.' in property path StaffSymbol.staff-space
>
> I think maybe the frescobaldi is not aware of change
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:26 AM Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> The following MWE gave a warning
>
> C:/Users/bk/AppData/Local/Temp/frescobaldi-n7fp9iem/tmp_isr57mt/document.ly:52:25:
> Warnung: deprecated: missing `.' in property path StaffSymbol.staff-space
>
> I think may
The following MWE gave a warning
C:/Users/bk/AppData/Local/Temp/frescobaldi-n7fp9iem/tmp_isr57mt/document.ly:52:25:
Warnung: deprecated: missing `.' in property path StaffSymbol.staff-space
I think maybe the frescobaldi is not aware of changes to this lilypond
version. What do I have change
I found the answer. See the Frescobaldi issue.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
1 - 100 of 2442 matches
Mail list logo
