Re: parenthesis around dot only (note value indication)

Hi Dirck, See Harm's : https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2017-05/msg00371.html E.g.: \version "2.24.3" #(define (parenthesize-dot parentheses-item) (let* ((dot (ly:grob-object (ly:grob-parent parentheses-item Y) 'dot))) (if (not (null? dot)) (begin (set!

parenthesis around dot only (note value indication)

Hi all I know this is highly unusual, but is there a way to add parentheses around the DOT ONLY after the notehead? see following image: [cid:85851784-8a26-48b0-b2b4-b9a8e03b517c] FYI, I have a piece with sequences of octaves. Every instance has a note value of a dotted quarter-note. There

Re: Issue with durations and roman numeral analysis tool

David and Aaron: Thank you for your prompt response and for resolving the issue. Joe Srednicki Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS On Tuesday, April 30, 2024, 8:12 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: Hi Joe, On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:55 PM Joseph Srednicki wrote: Based on the input, I expect

Re: Transparent box around notes

On 2024-04-30 5:30 pm, David Nalesnik wrote: What LilyPond version is the LSR currently running? (I'm wondering if you are able to use the revised add-grob-definition there.) This is documented on the Contributing page [1]. [1]: https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/html/contributing.html LSR

Re: Transparent box around notes

Hi Paolo, On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:09 PM Paolo Prete wrote: > Ta > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 8:04 PM K. Blum wrote: > >> Hi Paolo, hi everyone, >> >> > Yeah, it works if I just replace add-grob-definition with: >> > >> > #(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry) >> >(set!

Re: Issue with durations and roman numeral analysis tool

Hi Joe, On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:55 PM Joseph Srednicki wrote: > > Based on the input, I expect the vi 6 4 to appear beneath the final > sixteenth note of the second beat of the measure. However, the vi 6 4 > appears under the first note of the third beat in the measure. > > Can anyone please

Re: Issue with durations and roman numeral analysis tool

On 2024-04-30 4:54 pm, Joseph Srednicki wrote: Hello: I am having difficulty with durations and the roman numeral analysis tool roman_numeral_analysis_tool.ily, which I downloaded from GitHub - lyp-packages/roman-numerals: LilyPond typesetter for Roman numeral harmonic analysis See the tiny

Issue with durations and roman numeral analysis tool

Hello: I am having difficulty with durations and the roman numeral analysis tool  roman_numeral_analysis_tool.ily, which I downloaded from GitHub - lyp-packages/roman-numerals: LilyPond typesetter for Roman numeral harmonic analysis See the tiny example below. In this example, I have used beat

Re: Transparent box around notes

Ta On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 8:04 PM K. Blum wrote: > Hi Paolo, hi everyone, > > > Yeah, it works if I just replace add-grob-definition with: > > > > #(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry) > >(set! all-grob-descriptions > > (cons ((@@ (lily) completize-grob-entry) > >

RE: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

Paolo, Thank you. Mark From: Paolo Prete Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 1:08 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek ; lilypond-user Subject: Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives? You'll find all you need at the main page: https://github.com/paopre/Spontini Cheers On Tue,

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

You'll find all you need at the main page: https://github.com/paopre/Spontini Cheers On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:04 PM Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Paolo, > > > > Installation instructions? > Learning/notation manual? > > I want to try it. > > > > Mark > > > > *From:*

RE: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

Paolo, Installation instructions? Learning/notation manual? I want to try it. Mark From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org On Behalf Of Paolo Prete Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 12:58 PM To: Dirck Nagy ; lilypond-user Subject: Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

FYI I just made a new release of Spontini editor, with the most recent changes (most notably: support for recent Lilypond versions) As mentioned before, I don't own a MacOS, but the HUGE implemented CI/CD should avoid bad surprises. When I say "huge", I mean it. I always hope that someone decides

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

On 2024-04-30 10:05 am, Karlin High wrote: On 4/30/2024 10:25 AM, Jennifer Doering wrote: What happened to the Frescobaldi dev? Just doesn't have time to maintain it anymore? Link to past discussion: His software

Re: Transparent box around notes

Hi Paolo, hi everyone, Yeah, it works if I just replace add-grob-definition with: #(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry)    (set! all-grob-descriptions          (cons ((@@ (lily) completize-grob-entry)                 (cons grob-name grob-entry))                

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

On 4/30/2024 10:25 AM, Jennifer Doering wrote: What happened to the Frescobaldi dev? Just doesn't have time to maintain it anymore? Link to past discussion: His software development activity appears reduced after a

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

What happened to the Frescobaldi dev? Just doesn't have time to maintain it anymore?

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

Hi all, There are various alternatives around at least for Linux users, but there will certainly be different ones available for the Mac users as well. And who knows: maybe Frescobaldi will survive after all. And if it may stop working one day, it is good to know that at least you are not

Re: Embedding music expression in lyrics

On 2024-04-30 15:33, Walt North wrote: Hello,  I have a case where I'm putting together something will be mostly chordnames and lyrics with a few music expression hints needed here and there. I've been able to get most of what I want using \markup.  The only issue I've come across is

Embedding music expression in lyrics

Hello,  I have a case where I'm putting together something will be mostly chordnames and lyrics with a few music expression hints needed here and there. I've been able to get most of what I want using \markup.  The only issue I've come across is that the inserted markup seems to also add to

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:45 AM Dirck Nagy wrote: > Hi all > > Reading that last thread about Frescobaldi and its possible disappearance > from Mac is causing me to panic. Jean, I did not realize that you were the > last person to seriously work on Frescobaldi / Mac. > > > I use Mac exclusively,

Re: Transparent box around notes

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:38 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > [...] the snippet is _very_ useful, and certainly much easier to use > > than the lsr snippet. > > Please submit the example as a new LSR snippet. > > I submitted it (see: https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1=1188 ) but the second box

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

VS Code also provide point and click. Snippets and wizards are tipical features for any other programming language in VS Code. It should not be too difficult to write them for lilypond. I understand that it can be difficult to find the developers and mantainers to keep Frescobaldi runnig, but

2.25.15 segno repeat appearance: add text to coda sign

How does one add text to the coda sign using Segno repeat structure, i.e. add "To coda" to the coda sign automatically created? TIA, Paul

Re: Fw: Frescobaldi ... panic alternatives?

> FYI, what I like the most about Frescobaldi are: > >  * Templates and wizards >  * Snippets >  * Point and Click selection >  * Syntax highlighting > > If Frescobaldi for Mac does indeed vanish, what are my alternatives for a > Lilypond editor? Syntax highlighting should be doable in Emacs,