Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 13:29:22 +0100
From: "Chris Utech" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: stop-down [v04.n354/2]
Message: 2
Hi !
I have an F2 (Photomic S) and a 500mm reflex lens, which means that I
have
to use stop-down metering.
Can anyone enlighten me about the term stop-down metering? Does it
I said:
Nope, you need the PN-11 to get to 1:1 with this lens. It has a 55mm
extension.
That information was incorrect. The 105mm MF lens requires the PN-11 to
get to 1:1. If the PK-13 has 27.5 mm of extension, then it will be
required to get the 55mm lens to 1:1.
Jim
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 16:01:31 +0200
From: Marc Femenia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PK-13 extension ring [v04.n345/8]
Message: 8
Hello everybody!
I have been offered the possibility of buying a 55/2.8 micro with a
PK-13
extension ring. I think that with this combo a ratio of 1:1 reproduction
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:21:17 +0530
From: "Amarendra N Kolipakam" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blue Skies and filter stacking [v04.n345/3]
Message: 3
snip
Now, the main subject of the post:
I was shooting some landscapes with my N70 + 35-80 4-5.6 AF-D setup a
while ago
and saw that the whole
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 15:31:51 +0200
From: Walter Freiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New AF-S 400/4.5 ??? [v04.n344/11]
Message: 11
Hi all
I heard that Moose Peterson should have claimed in his newsletter, that
Nikon were about to introduce a new 400/4.5 AF-S lens that weighs only
slightly
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 17:45:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Robert Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dirt seen thru the view finder on an F5 [v04.n305/19]
Message: 19
In general what can people do to maintain viewing clarify on an F5.
Same as any other SLR. You clean the screen and the mirror.
I'm
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 14:55:38 -0600
From: "Stan Lipnowski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:Even More Questions Re TC 14B [v04.n287/13]
Message: 13
Using the 300 F4, TC 14B and an F70 my display blinks F - -. This is on
A,
S, P, and M.
What is the reasoning for this ith the TC 14 B?
TIA
Stan
The
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 22:07:14 -0800
From: Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: some manual focus lens questions [v04.n235/25]
Message: 25
I have been shopping for the following prime lenses and I'd appreciate
if
someone would describe the _optical_ differences, if any, between the
following
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:30:07 +1100
From: Tony Balm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: V4.216/23: flimsy flash feet on NIKON flash etc. [v04.n218/25]
Message: 25
It's not a bad idea to have a weak point to break rather than damage the
camera, this I can accept. What I have trouble accepting is that
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:24:19 +0100
From: "Thomas Buro" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Circular Polarizing Filter for F3? [v04.n202/3]
Message: 3
Title says it all: Does the F3 require a circular Polarizing Filter for
correct
exposure?
No
AF Cameras need it for correct focus. Some cameras which
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:44:42 -0500
From: MIKE MOORE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Good Lense for Portraits? [v04.n200/30]
Message: 30
I'm considering buying a 105mm 2.8 D
AF Micro-Nikkor for portraits. I'll
be coupling it to a N70. Good
choice? I shoot mostly BW if it
matters. Also anyone know
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 22:56:08 -0500
From: Mike Rohde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Commnets requested on Nikor 300mm f4 EDIF [v04.n198/31]
Message: 31
Looking to buy a 300mm lense. Can't afford the f2.8 nikors. Was
wondering what everyone thought of the 300mm f4 nikor. When using in day
light
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 22:09:46 -0800
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to take Sepia Photos?? [v04.n183/20]
Message: 20
I know this isn't nikon specific but, I know of no better place to ask.
I
am going to be doing a photo shoot for a friends parents and they want
some
of the pictures
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:50:47 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cande V Ananth)
Subject: Particle of dust in my N90s [v04.n166/15]
Message: 15
Folks:
I own an N90s, and I just noticed that there is a small black
particle (perhaps dust) when I look through the view finder.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 13:13:18 PST
From: Michael Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 35/2 and 50/1.8 vs 35-80 for sharpness [v04.n160/15]
Message: 15
Hi folks,
I bought a 35/2.0 and a 50/1.8 recently. They're both great
lenses to use and I'm growing to love them already.
However, I decided to
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:14:15 +0100
From: "Thomas Buro" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Metal Hood for 50/1.8 AIS [v04.n157/21]
Message: 21
On a website I found that you should use the HR-2 for the 50mmAF1.8, and
50AIS1.2 (orHS-9) or the HR-1 (orHS12) for the 50mmAIS1.4.
The website is
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 13:51:27 +1300 (NZDT)
From: "Lars E. Anderson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PK-3 on N90s [v04.n151/1]
Message: 1
The N90s manual says that the PK-3 ring cannot be used on the N90s. Why
not? Will it cause damage? Can the PK-3 need to be modified to fit?
Ths PK3 is a
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 1998 22:12:37 +0800
From: miguel n nacianceno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: the uses of the F5/F100 focus system [v04.n152/25]
Message: 25
Dear guys,
I'm a little curious here. I use an F90x and an FM2n and I've never had
the
chance to use an F5 (much more the new F100). I do
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 12:01:33 -
From: "John Partis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sharpness: Nikkor lens versus film [v04.n150/14]
Message: 14
Anyone any thoughts on comparison of lens sharpness versus film? What I
mean
is - if I have a 55mm microNikkor (renowned for its sharpness, and
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 21:02:56 +0800
From: miguel n nacianceno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: how 'bout these lenses? [v04.n150/17]
Message: 17
Hey guys,
My dad was kind enough to lend/give me some of his lenses. I haven't had
the time to do some enlargement comparison so I'd like really to hear
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 13:50:01 PST
From: Michael Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nikon 75-300 [v04.n143/23] [v04.n146/31]
Message: 31
snip
I'm an amateur without much experience, but I have the Sigma
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO macro lens and I love it. I find it every
bit as sharp as, say, the
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 10:49:12 +0600
From: "Anil Advani" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Longer exposure in the A mode on F3. [v04.n145/4]
Message: 4
The F3 CANNOT be set to any exposure longer than 8 seconds -
regardless if in "A" or "M" mode! The only way to shoot longer
exposures than 8
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:56:07 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Troubleshooting my FG [v04.n142/2]
Message: 2
snip
I am having some trouble with my Nikon FG and was hoping someone
here could help me identify it. The problem has been present for a few
years
but recently has started to
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 12:48:04 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Longer exposure in the A mode on F3. [v04.n140/17]
Dear All:
I just bought a used F3, and tried it yesterday. When I set exposure in
the
A mode, I found that the shutter could not close if the exposure time
was
longer than
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 23:24:00 -0600 (CST)
From: Coleman Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Flash advice, please [v04.n140/19]
I have recently asked the list advice on the N90s and also several
different
lenses. I have received numerous replies and some great advice. Many
thanks to all of you
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 10:48:23 +0100
From: Eertmans Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ever tried to fix a broken FM meter? [3]
Hi,
Last week, I sent my FM for repair. After a fall, the meter ceased to
function. Well, the camera is already back but not fixed... parts are
not available anymore
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:45:43 GMT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (N H)
Subject: F3HighPoint specs or features? [16]
I'm considering swapping my Nikkormat FS and 8008s for a single camera
and
am thinking a F3Highpoint is what I need. Where can I find a spec sheet
or
general features of the F3.
BH's
27 matches
Mail list logo
