Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14052
**[Test build #61745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61745/consoleFull)**
for PR 14052 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14052
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61745/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14052
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049#discussion_r69520353
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -538,20 +538,29 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61746 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61746/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894#discussion_r69524371
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ private[ml] trait CrossValidatorParams extends
Github user maver1ck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14054
@srowen
Maybe we can add this as a configuration option ?
I'm not sure how this affects performance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13389
LGTM, merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69518421
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -230,6 +236,15 @@ trait FileFormat {
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
Same error, yes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69519846
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -230,6 +236,15 @@ trait FileFormat {
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69520870
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -172,6 +171,13 @@ case class
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61746/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012#discussion_r69522366
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1106,12 +1106,15 @@ object PushDownPredicate
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
**[Test build #61747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61747/consoleFull)**
for PR 14053 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r69511063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -237,54 +229,100 @@ case class Divide(left:
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
[SPARK-16374] [SQL] Remove Alias from MetastoreRelation and
SimpleCatalogRelation
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Different from the other leaf nodes,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
**[Test build #61747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61747/consoleFull)**
for PR 14053 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13389
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61747/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
**[Test build #61750 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61750/consoleFull)**
for PR 14038 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033#discussion_r69510808
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,63 @@ case class UserDefinedGenerator(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14053#discussion_r69516779
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ private[hive] class
Github user jameszhouyi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13542
Hi,
Could you please help to review this PR to merge it in 2.0.0 ? this broken
thing blocked our testing. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69520156
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -172,6 +171,13 @@ case class
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
Merged to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r69528969
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -31,4 +33,46 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756#discussion_r69528941
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -867,8 +865,8 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Ping @hvanhovell, @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r69511190
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -237,54 +229,100 @@ case class Divide(left:
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69519099
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -230,6 +236,15 @@ trait FileFormat {
}
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69519931
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -172,6 +171,13 @@ case class
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047#discussion_r69527187
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -391,6 +391,29 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
Left some comments, the overall structure looks good. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14044
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13389#discussion_r69527639
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/CatalystWriteSupport.scala
---
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ private[parquet]
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69532282
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
@cloud-fan Option 1 did not work for some cases. If
```UnsafeArrayWriter.write()``` is not called for all of elements, e.g. only
some of elements are written. For example, [this
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69519641
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -172,6 +171,13 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
**[Test build #61748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61748/consoleFull)**
for PR 14012 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14054
**[Test build #61749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61749/consoleFull)**
for PR 14054 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012#discussion_r69522538
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1106,12 +1106,15 @@ object PushDownPredicate
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69532511
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12972
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034
**[Test build #61746 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61746/consoleFull)**
for PR 14034 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69520532
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -172,6 +171,13 @@ case class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69520473
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -437,11 +442,26 @@ private[sql] object
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14051#discussion_r69521248
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038#discussion_r69521137
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/fileSourceInterfaces.scala
---
@@ -230,6 +236,15 @@ trait FileFormat {
}
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14054
[SPARK-16226] [SQL] Weaken JDBC isolation level to avoid locking when
writing partitions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Saving partitions to JDBC in transaction can
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69532226
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -725,4 +725,51 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61774/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
**[Test build #61775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61775/consoleFull)**
for PR 14041 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14009
Thank you for fast fix!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
**[Test build #61782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
**[Test build #61783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61783/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #61781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61781/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
@zsxwing I was able to do following without error:
git clone g...@github.com:apache/spark.git spark-master
cd spark-master
./dev/change-scala-version.sh 2.10
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69635219
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -423,18 +432,35 @@ private[spark]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61759/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61759/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
**[Test build #3161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3161/consoleFull)**
for PR 14041 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
**[Test build #61772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61772/consoleFull)**
for PR 14033 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13818
FYI this breaks Scala 2.10:
```
[info] Compiling 254 Scala sources and 5 Java sources to
/home/jenkins/workspace/spark-master-compile-sbt-scala-2.10/mllib/target/scala-2.10/classes...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61774/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14033
Master branch is broken now. I'll retry to test later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Ah, you are right. Exactly, [this
code](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MiscFunctionsSuite.scala#L150)
writes
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Master is broken currently. I'll retry to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
**[Test build #3162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3162/consoleFull)**
for PR 14041 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14020
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14020
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61768/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61776/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
From this + looking at jenkins, it seems like master is broken
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
**[Test build #61784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61784/consoleFull)**
for PR 9207 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61781/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
**[Test build #3163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3163/consoleFull)**
for PR 14043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61783/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889
**[Test build #61783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61783/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r69635495
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14057
[SPARK-15425][SQL] Disallow cross joins, even if it is broadcast nested
loop - WIP
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WIP
## How was this patch tested?
WIP
You can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61774/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
That build error looks hive related... I can try merging latest master
@tdas yes, the reason unidoc is failing is because it's throwing all
dependencies from all subprojects into one
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
I've fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13873
/cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #61767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61767/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
**[Test build #61770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61770/consoleFull)**
for PR 13756 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13756
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #61781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61781/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14043
LGTM pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
1 - 100 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
