Github user amankothari04 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
@viirya did you get a chance to review this ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19492
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19487
Looking a bit more at this. I see it handles """ as well as empty, and also
other forms of invalid URI which Path can't handle today ("multiple colons
except with file:// on windows, etc).
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82730/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
**[Test build #82730 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82730/testReport)**
for PR 18979 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19452#discussion_r144532481
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinHelperSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19480#discussion_r144541081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -201,6 +201,23 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19488
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82725/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19464
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82726/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19464
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19464
**[Test build #82726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82726/testReport)**
for PR 19464 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
**[Test build #82731 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82731/testReport)**
for PR 18979 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
Thanks for reviewing this/getting it in. Personally, I had it in the
"improvement" category rather than bug fix. If it wasn't for that line in the
docs, there'd be no ambiguity about
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19487
LGTM. I'm going stick out today a slight roll of my PathOutputCommitter
class which is one layer above FileOutputCommitter : lets people write
committers without output & work paths, yet
Github user aphasingnirvana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
@srowen I believe the bug still persists. Shouldn't we reopen it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
**[Test build #82730 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82730/testReport)**
for PR 18979 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
**[Test build #82727 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82727/testReport)**
for PR 19476 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19476
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82727/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
**[Test build #82732 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82732/testReport)**
for PR 18979 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
I guess we wouldn't change the docs in branch-2.2 alone as we have a safe
fix here for this mismatch anyway. I think I just wanted to say this backport
can be justified.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19491
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82728/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19491
**[Test build #82728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82728/testReport)**
for PR 19491 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19488
**[Test build #82733 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82733/testReport)**
for PR 19488 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19480
**[Test build #82734 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82734/testReport)**
for PR 19480 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17290
I don't think this change was the ultimate fix, and it caused another
problem, so no I don't think this PR should be reopened.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
**[Test build #82729 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82729/testReport)**
for PR 18805 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19487#discussion_r144545827
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/io/HadoopMapReduceCommitProtocol.scala
---
@@ -60,15 +71,6 @@ class
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19452#discussion_r144533029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinHelperSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user maryannxue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19488#discussion_r144543377
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -205,14 +205,15 @@ object PhysicalAggregation {
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
PS, for people who are interested in dynamic committers,
[MAPREDUCE-6823](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6823) is
something to look at. It allows you to switch committers
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19480
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19494
[SPARK-22249][SQL] isin with empty list throws exception on cached DataFrame
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As pointed out in the JIRA, there is a bug which causes an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19480
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82735/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19494
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19494
@srowen do you mean replacing `contains` with `exists`? If so, might you
please explain me why `exists` is a better option? Thanks.
---
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r144597485
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -510,9 +511,43 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
Okay. I am sorry for this trouble. Should we revert this if you guys feel
strongly about it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
I have a lot of sympathy for the argument that infrastructure software
shouldn't have too many backports and that those should be generally bug fixes.
But, if I were working on a Spark distribution
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r144602775
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -84,25 +84,45 @@ private[sql] trait ColumnarBatchScan
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
**[Test build #82741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82741/testReport)**
for PR 19419 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
Turns out that's caused by SparkContext failing to clean up after itself
when the `UnsatisfiedLinkError` happens, so those errors are red herrings...
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82738/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19480
**[Test build #82735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82735/testReport)**
for PR 19480 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
@steveloughran Thanks for your inputs. Totally agree on your opinions.
Spark is an infrastructure software. We have to be very careful when
backporting the PRs.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
Could you resolve the conflicts again?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r144599111
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -510,9 +511,43 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
Thank you, @cloud-fan , @gatorsmile , and @viirya !!!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
I am not really worried about this particular change. It's already merged
and it seems a small and safe change. I am not planning to revert it.
But, in general, let's avoid of merging changes
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19464#discussion_r144604878
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/FileSuite.scala ---
@@ -510,4 +510,87 @@ class FileSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
LocalSparkContext {
Github user sathiyapk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19451
@rxin I think it would be better to keep all the rules of the "Replace
Operators" batch in a single file. So if you prefer to keep the rule in a new
file, we can move all the replace operator
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19269
**[Test build #82738 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82738/testReport)**
for PR 19269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
**[Test build #82742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82742/testReport)**
for PR 19419 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
**[Test build #82737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82737/testReport)**
for PR 19419 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
Hi, @steveloughran .
> is the issue with ORC that if there's nothing to write, it doesn't
generate a file (so avoiding that issue with sometimes you get 0-byte ORC files
& things
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82732/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979
**[Test build #82731 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82731/testReport)**
for PR 18979 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19470
BTW, @cloud-fan . Could you review #18460 , too? I think we need your final
approval. :)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r144594930
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -510,9 +511,43 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r144600676
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -510,9 +511,43 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r144601470
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -510,9 +511,43 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
LGTM, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user barnardb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19354
I totally understand the reluctance to have non-ASF projects in a list
headed by "The system currently supportsâ¦". Looking at the [Powered
By](https://spark.apache.org/powered-by.html) page, it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19451
**[Test build #82740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82740/testReport)**
for PR 19451 at commit
Github user sathiyapk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19451
@gatorsmile
> Could you please add an end-to-end testsuite except.sql of
SQLQueryTestSuite.scala?
Please verify `except.sql ` and `except.sql.out` files are enough for the
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
I haven't been able to reproduce the issue locally, but looking at the
jenkins logs I see a bunch of exceptions like these:
```
17/10/13 06:53:26.609 dispatcher-event-loop-15 ERROR
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
Sure, I will and let me note it ahead next time. I made a mistake while
trying to think of reasons for this backport.
---
-
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r144609180
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -23,21 +23,37 @@ import
Github user krishna-pandey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
@jerryshao removed Whitespace at end of line 440 in package.scala. ok to
test.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18979#discussion_r144595826
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/BasicWriteStatsTracker.scala
---
@@ -44,20 +47,32 @@ case class
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19448
@HyukjinKwon branch-2.2 is in a maintenance branch, I am not sure it is
appropriate to merge this change to branch-2.2 since it is not really a bug
fix. If the doc is not accurate, we should fix the
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r144598051
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -510,9 +511,43 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18460
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747#discussion_r144603628
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/columnar/InMemoryTableScanExec.scala
---
@@ -23,21 +23,37 @@ import
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18805
(I'll file a bug and send a PR for it separately, btw.)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
**[Test build #82741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82741/testReport)**
for PR 19419 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19419
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82741/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82746/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18747
**[Test build #82746 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82746/testReport)**
for PR 18747 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19435
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19467
**[Test build #82747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82747/testReport)**
for PR 19467 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19467
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82747/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19385
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19495
**[Test build #82751 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82751/testReport)**
for PR 19495 at commit
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144681758
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -170,9 +175,119 @@
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144680448
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -122,7 +126,8 @@
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144681733
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -170,9 +175,119 @@
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144680213
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosFineGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -159,7 +160,8 @@
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144680478
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -170,9 +175,119 @@
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144680608
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -522,6 +522,43 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144680489
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -170,9 +175,119 @@
Github user ArtRand commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19437#discussion_r144680353
--- Diff:
resource-managers/mesos/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -122,7 +126,8 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19452
**[Test build #82748 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82748/testReport)**
for PR 19452 at commit
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
