Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71699/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
**[Test build #71699 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71699/testReport)**
for PR 11867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71701/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
**[Test build #71701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71701/testReport)**
for PR 16593 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16656
**[Test build #71708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71708/testReport)**
for PR 16656 at commit
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16656
[SPARK-18116][DStream] Report stream input information after recover from
checkpoint
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Run a streaming application which souce from
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
**[Test build #71707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71707/testReport)**
for PR 16654 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71698/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
**[Test build #71698 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71698/testReport)**
for PR 16654 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586
Hi @srowen, I think it is ready for a second look. In short, the current
status is,
- there are some test failures
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586#issuecomment-273437565)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71696/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
**[Test build #71696 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71696/testReport)**
for PR 16645 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586#discussion_r97022356
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListenerSuite.scala ---
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ class SparkListenerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71702/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
**[Test build #71702 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71702/testReport)**
for PR 16593 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770#discussion_r97021451
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/PowerIterationClustering.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16586
They all pass in individual tests with `test-only` (please check the logs
above).
```
org.apache.spark.scheduler.SparkListenerSuite:
- local metrics (8 seconds, 656
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16619
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71700/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16619
**[Test build #71700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71700/testReport)**
for PR 16619 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16619
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97019304
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97019071
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -124,7 +129,8 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582#discussion_r97018717
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/JettyUtils.scala ---
@@ -306,23 +311,31 @@ private[spark] object JettyUtils extends Logging {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631
Thanks! Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
**[Test build #71706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71706/testReport)**
for PR 16566 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97018334
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631#discussion_r97017980
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ abstract class UnaryNode
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631#discussion_r97017902
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ abstract class UnaryNode extends
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566#discussion_r97017872
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -38,6 +45,149 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note LDAModel since 2.1.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16655
**[Test build #71705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71705/testReport)**
for PR 16655 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593#discussion_r97017743
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/CreateHiveTableAsSelectCommand.scala
---
@@ -45,6 +46,18 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16655
cc @yhuai @gatorsmile @windpiger
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16655
[SPARK-19305][SQL] partitioned table should always put partition columns at
the end of table schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For data source tables, we will
Github user junegunn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16347
Rebased to current master. The patch is simpler thanks to the refactoring
made in [SPARK-18243](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18243).
Anyway, I can understand your rationale
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16642
**[Test build #71704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71704/testReport)**
for PR 16642 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16642
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71703/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16642
**[Test build #71703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71703/testReport)**
for PR 16642 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16642
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97016294
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -124,7 +129,8 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16642
**[Test build #71703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71703/testReport)**
for PR 16642 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16643
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16643
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71695/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16643
**[Test build #71695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71695/testReport)**
for PR 16643 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16653
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
thanks all, let's make a summary:
1. no CTAS
`
create table t(a int, b int, c string, d string)
using $provider
partitioned by(d, c)
`
the schema order of table in
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97015657
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper extends
Github user keypointt closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15353
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
**[Test build #71702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71702/testReport)**
for PR 16593 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
**[Test build #71699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71699/testReport)**
for PR 11867 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566#discussion_r97014380
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -38,6 +45,149 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note LDAModel since 2.1.0
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566#discussion_r97014257
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -38,6 +45,149 @@ setClass("KMeansModel", representation(jobj = "jobj"))
#' @note LDAModel since 2.1.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16593
**[Test build #71701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71701/testReport)**
for PR 16593 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16619
**[Test build #71700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71700/testReport)**
for PR 16619 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16653
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71697/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16457
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16457
I think it better to discuss in the JIRA. When we come to an agreement, I
will reopen this pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16653
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16653
**[Test build #71697 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71697/testReport)**
for PR 16653 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
**[Test build #71698 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71698/testReport)**
for PR 16654 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631#discussion_r97013889
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ abstract class UnaryNode
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631
LGTM except one comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
[SPARK-19303][ML][WIP] Add evaluate method in clustering models
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1, add evaluation metric in summary
2, add an evaluate() method
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646
looks good. just have some question not specific to this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97013742
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -124,7 +129,8 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97013542
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97013459
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16653
**[Test build #71697 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71697/testReport)**
for PR 16653 at commit
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16653
[SPARK-19302][DOC][MINOR] Fix the wrong item format in security.md
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In docs/security.md, there is a description as follows.
```
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user admackin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16652
[SPARK-19234][MLLib] AFTSurvivalRegression should fail fast when any labels
are zero
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If any labels of 0.0 (which are invalid) are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
**[Test build #71696 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71696/testReport)**
for PR 16645 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71693/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16645
**[Test build #71693 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71693/testReport)**
for PR 16645 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16633
Hi @viirya , the main concern of @scwf is that, we can't afford performance
regression in any customer scenarios. I think you can understand that :)
I went through the discussion above, it
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16647
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16647
Thanks! Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631#discussion_r97009203
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ abstract class UnaryNode extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16631#discussion_r97008849
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ abstract class UnaryNode
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71694/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #71694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71694/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
**[Test build #71692 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71692/testReport)**
for PR 15219 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15219
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71692/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16630
jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97007956
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16646#discussion_r97007694
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GaussianMixtureWrapper.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +92,10 @@ private[r] object GaussianMixtureWrapper extends
Github user scwf commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16633
@viirya i suggest fix the 2 in this pr, let's wait some comment on 1. /cc
@rxin and @wzhfy who may comment on the first case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71690/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11867
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
