Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14173
cc @felixcheung @sun-rui @mengxr @junyangq
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user shivaram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14173
[SPARKR][SPARK-16507] Add a CRAN checker, fix Rd aliases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a check-cran.sh script that runs `R CMD check` as CRAN. Also fixes
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090#discussion_r70346974
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -306,6 +306,64 @@ head(ldf, 3)
{% endhighlight %}
+ Run a given function on a large dataset
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13993
Change LGTM. Thanks @junyangq and @yanboliang for reviewing. Merging this
to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14011
Thanks @yanboliang - LGTM. Merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090#discussion_r70202560
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -306,6 +306,64 @@ head(ldf, 3)
{% endhighlight %}
+ Run a given function on a large dataset
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090#discussion_r70202064
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -306,6 +306,64 @@ head(ldf, 3)
{% endhighlight %}
+ Run a given function on a large dataset
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
No - I just noticed a JIRA that said it was a regression, so I wanted to
make sure you caught this in the RC cycle
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14118
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14011
@yanboliang is this good to go ? Would be good to merge this soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Thanks @keypointt -- LGTM. Will merge this once Jenkins passes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
Thanks @keypointt -- Changes look good to me. @felixcheung any other
comments ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70125056
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70124201
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70122513
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70122361
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70121939
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70121544
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70121398
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70012365
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
LGTM. Thanks @dongjoon-hyun -- Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70009456
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082#discussion_r70008001
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096#discussion_r70006591
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1804,11 +1804,11 @@ test_that("describe() and summarize() on a
Data
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096#discussion_r70003846
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1804,11 +1804,11 @@ test_that("describe() and summarize() on a
Data
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
Yeah we should just call it with empty columns (instead of all the columns)
and let the Scala side do the appropriate thing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14082
I'll take a look at this today. Also cc @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13984
LGTM. Merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13984#discussion_r69997940
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -744,6 +747,9 @@ read.df.default <- function(path = NULL, source = NULL,
schema = NULL, ...) {
if (is.n
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14096
I'm not sure this is something we should be fixing just on R frontend.
What happens when we run the query from Scala / Python ? If we get the same
error we should be fixing it in Scala
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13984#discussion_r69945470
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -744,6 +747,9 @@ read.df.default <- function(path = NULL, source = NULL,
schema = NULL, ...) {
if (is.n
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090
cc @felixcheung @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14041
I just noticed that our nightly docs build has been failing with an error
related to kafka (Example [1]). Will this PR fix this or should we open a new
JIRA for this ?
[1]
https
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13984#discussion_r69487213
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -744,6 +747,9 @@ read.df.default <- function(path = NULL, source = NULL,
schema = NULL, ...) {
if (is.n
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14046#discussion_r69486820
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1258,10 +1258,12 @@ test_that("date functions on a DataFrame", {
df2 <- cr
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14019
@dongjoon-hyun I merged this into branch-2.0, so it should be present in
the next RC.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14019
Thanks @dongjoon-hyun - I manually tested this as well and it works fine.
LGTM. Will merge after Jenkins passes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13984#discussion_r69359023
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -744,6 +746,9 @@ read.df.default <- function(path = NULL, source = NULL,
schema = NULL, ...) {
if (is.n
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13975
Thanks @sun-rui -- I just tested this and this fixes the issue with the
`pipeRDD` unit test on my machine.
LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760
Thanks all. LGTM. Merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13975
@sun-rui This is a great find ! I will test this locally as well
cc @JoshRosen who was running into the same problem with pipeRDD tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13904
Sure - LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13946
merging this to master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760#discussion_r68508656
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -243,17 +236,73 @@ setMethod("gapply",
signature(x = "GroupedData"),
func
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13885
LGTM. Thanks @felixcheung - Merging this into master and branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13885#discussion_r68491306
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -110,11 +110,46 @@ infer_type <- function(x) {
}
}
-getDefaultSqlSource <- fu
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760
@felixcheung Any other comments on this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839#discussion_r68480005
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -194,7 +194,12 @@ setMethod("isLocal",
setMethod("showDF",
signature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839#discussion_r68433503
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -194,7 +194,12 @@ setMethod("isLocal",
setMethod("showDF",
signature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13885#discussion_r68423467
--- Diff: R/pkg/NAMESPACE ---
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ export("sparkR.session")
export("sparkR.init")
export("
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839
Thanks @ScrapCodes -- R changes LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13877
The new document in the screenshot looks pretty good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13877#discussion_r68352034
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -390,23 +376,41 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"KMeansModel"),
return(d
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839#discussion_r68317660
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -194,7 +194,12 @@ setMethod("isLocal",
setMethod("showDF",
signature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13839#discussion_r68317336
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ setMethod("isLocal",
#' @param x A SparkDataFrame
#' @param numRows The numb
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13838
LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760#discussion_r68268602
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -199,17 +199,10 @@ createMethods()
#' Applies a R function to each group in the input GroupedData
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13660
@felixcheung @jkbradley any more comments on this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760#discussion_r68090167
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -199,17 +199,10 @@ createMethods()
#' Applies a R function to each group in the input GroupedData
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13838#discussion_r68089154
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -392,47 +392,81 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
#' Assigns a group ID to all the jobs started by this thread un
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13760#discussion_r68087556
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/group.R ---
@@ -242,18 +235,73 @@ createMethods()
setMethod("gapply",
signature(x = &q
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13838#discussion_r68086736
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -392,47 +392,81 @@ sparkR.session <- function(
#' Assigns a group ID to all the jobs started by this thread un
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
Irrespective of people reading the guide, it'll at least be useful to point
out what is the expected behavior in a code review etc. But yeah automatic
style checks would be really cool
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13820
I think the `#D` comes from using `dontrun`
https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/e5b21d0397c607883ff25cca379687b86933d730/src/library/tools/R/Rd2ex.R#L72
I don't see an easy way to disable
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13584
cc @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13805
Alright - yeah lets leave `explode` as is for now. LGTM. Merging this to
master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
Yeah - thanks for all the work in cleaning this up. One thing that i was
wondering is we could add some style guide checks or contribution guide rules
on how to maintain documentation. We can
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13660#discussion_r67920626
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -262,6 +262,83 @@ head(df)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Applying User-defined Function
+In SparkR, we
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
LGTM. Merging this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13805
Just wondering -- is there a list of SparkSQL deprecations for 2.0.0 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
Thanks - rebuilt locally and the docs look good. Will merge after Jenkins
passes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13805
cc @liancheng
Code changes look good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
Other than the comment about the `family` link the rest of the changes look
good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803#discussion_r67911376
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -33,7 +32,7 @@ setOldClass("jobj")
#' of `col2`. The name of the first column will be `$col1_$col
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
@felixcheung Can you change the JIRA in the title to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16109 ? I created a sub-task for
statfunctions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803
cc @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13660#discussion_r67910379
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -262,6 +262,83 @@ head(df)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Applying User-defined Function
+In SparkR, we
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13790
Thanks -- I should have noticed it before the merge, but missed it. I have
resolved the JIRA and put in a link to the PR there, so I think its all fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
Cool. Thanks - LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13801#discussion_r67818449
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -298,17 +296,17 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
#' @expo
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13801
Changes look fine given what was a part of #13023
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13801#discussion_r67818028
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -298,17 +296,17 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"NaiveBayesModel"),
#' @expo
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Alright I'm merging this to master and branch-2.0 so that it makes it to
the RC. We can try and fix minor things going forward
Thanks @felixcheung -- This is a much needed clean up
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Thanks for the update. This one looks fine to me now.
@dongjoon-hyun Any other comments ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
@mengxr @felixcheung Can we open a new issue of the form `Separate out rd
files for SparkR functions` ? We can then make a list there of everything thats
sharing a rd file right now and see what
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
@mengxr Yes - this is true and in #13798 we are making a few more of the
methods into individual Rd files. At a high level there is a tradition in R to
group together similar methods
(https
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
LGTM. This version looks good to me. Thanks for iterating on this. Will
wait for Jenkins and then merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67811551
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -134,9 +129,7 @@ setMethod("freqItems", signature(x = "SparkDataFrame",
cols = "character&qu
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295
@mhnatiuk Given that #13786 was merged, can you close this PR ? Only the PR
authors have permission to close a PR in the Spark project
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798#discussion_r67810125
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -689,67 +689,67 @@ setGeneric("randomSplit", function(x, weights, seed)
{ standardGeneric
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13799
Thanks LGTM. Will wait for @liancheng to also take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Yeah lets do that in a separate PR with discussion ? We don't lose much by
leaving in a few extra functions that we deprecate / remove later.
Thanks for the doc cleanup - I'll take one
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13798
Hmm can we document somewhere why we want to remove this functionality ? Is
this because spark context is no longer accessible ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109#discussion_r67806444
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/stats.R ---
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
setOldClass("jobj")
-#' crosstab
+#' @title SparkDataFrame statistic
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13786
LGTM. Merging this to master, branch-2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13109
cc @dongjoon-hyun
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13790
LGTM -- @felixcheung @sun-rui let me know if you have any comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13660#discussion_r67772111
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -262,6 +262,79 @@ head(df)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Applying User-defined Function
+In SparkR, we
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13660#discussion_r67771773
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -262,6 +262,79 @@ head(df)
{% endhighlight %}
+### Applying User-defined Function
+In SparkR, we
701 - 800 of 2516 matches
Mail list logo
