Hi Adriano,
I haven’t looked through minutes and such yet, but as I recall this ordering
was discussed a number of times on Validation Subcommittee calls during the
creation of SC-062 (i.e. sometime in 2020-2023). The resultant ordering
originated from the combination of 3 primary sources:
1.
Thank you Jaime , but I had already checked that.
At that link I can only find the following very short exchange between
chrisbn and sleevi:
@chrisbn chrisbn May 13, 2022
Yes, I wonder about the order of fields not in this list.
I understand the hierarchy to order logic, but is the order
The discussion in
https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/36#discussion_r872103477 could
help.
> On 21 Mar 2024, at 09:39, Adriano Santoni via Servercert-wg
> wrote:
>
> All, can anyone help me find the past email discussion, or at least the
> rationale that someone wrote somewhere
All, can anyone help me find the past email discussion, or at least the
rationale that someone wrote somewhere (e.g. on Github?), supporting the
Subject attributes encoding relative order requirement that was
introduced in BR 2.0.0 (Ballot SC-062) ?
I am talking about §7.1.4.2 Subject
