Off Topic -- "X-BeenThere: " missing from list message headers.

Suddenly my message filters stopped working. I've been using "X-BeenThere:" in the message headers to filter list emails. Do I need to create new filters, has X-BeenThere been obsoleted? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: criterion proposal: upgrading across 2 releases

> I feel that for something as important as system upgrade, we should provide a > better level of quality and assurance for upgrading across 2 releases. > Currently we have no criterion and testing it is just an afterthought, not > even tracked anywhere. I'd like to amend the existing criterion to

2015-11-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - Minutes

== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting == Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-11-23/fedora-qa.2015-11-23-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

> >> Well, here's our latest mess-up: > >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-e00b75e39f > >> dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.7.0-1.fc22 had enough karma for stable > >> on > > Oct 29, which was Go/No-Go day. Therefore it was considered "resolved". > > > > "Had enough karma" != queued

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 227 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 176 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 109

rawhide report: 20151123 changes

Compose started at Mon Nov 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

testcase proposal: joining bios+uefi in system upgrade section

Now that we have system-upgrade instead of fedup, I don't think we need to split every single upgrade test case between bios and uefi, as we have it right now: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Installation_test_matrix#Upgrade The difference is that fedup created its own upgrade

Re: criterion proposal: upgrading across 2 releases

I believe a failure to upgrade from N-2 to N should not block the N release. The reason is limited resources, both for tests and for changes to fix problems. These resources are more valuable applied to the N release than to something two releases in the past. If someone wants to test a

Re: Off Topic -- "X-BeenThere: " missing from list message headers.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/23/2015 04:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:42:53 -0800 Adam Williamson > wrote: > >> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:35 -0800, Joshua Andrews wrote: >>> Suddenly my message filters stopped working. I've

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 297 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467 openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 177 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9141 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc21 166

Re: Off Topic -- "X-BeenThere: " missing from list message headers.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:50:00 -0500 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > A similar and more annoying problem is that mailman 3 lost the > X-List-Administrivia header (and didn't replace it with anything at > all), so all list administrators have no simple way to filter out the >

Re: testcase proposal: joining bios+uefi in system upgrade section

> Now that we have system-upgrade instead of fedup, I don't think we need to > split every single upgrade test case between bios and uefi, as we have it > right now: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Installation_test_matrix#Upgrade > > The difference is that fedup created its own upgrade

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:36:16 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > #2 MOAR METADATA > > > The alternative is to make the existing Blocker trackers do more work. > In this model we wouldn't add any new tracker bugs; we'd just add new > 'magic words' in the

2015-11-25 @ 21:00 UTC - Taskotron Outage and Upgrade

# Taskotron Outage and Upgrade # Date: 2015-11-25 # Time: 21:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Length: Approximately 4 hours There is a larger infra outage scheduled for Wednesday and we're going to take advantage of that to do an upgrade to production Taskotron.

Fedora Rawhide 20151123 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Kde live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151122 Images in Rawhide 20151122 but not this: Kde live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 26 of

criterion proposal: upgrading across 2 releases

Our current upgrade criterion says: "For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete an upgrade from a fully updated installation of the previous stable Fedora release with that package set installed."

Re: criterion proposal: upgrading across 2 releases

On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 13:26 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > I feel that for something as important as system upgrade, we should provide > > a > > better level of quality and assurance for upgrading across 2 releases. > > Currently we have no criterion and testing it is just an afterthought, not > >

Re: Off Topic -- "X-BeenThere: " missing from list message headers.

On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:35 -0800, Joshua Andrews wrote: > Suddenly my message filters stopped working. I've been using "X-BeenThere:" > in the message headers to filter list emails. Do I need to create new > filters, has X-BeenThere been obsoleted? This is probably to do with the mailman3

Re: testcase proposal: joining bios+uefi in system upgrade section

On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 10:36 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > Oh, one more thing - similarly to _bios and _uefi test cases, I'd > like to change existing _workstation_encrypted test case to just > _encrypted test case - it shouldn't matter which package set is > installed to verify that there's no

Re: Off Topic -- "X-BeenThere: " missing from list message headers.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 12:42:53 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:35 -0800, Joshua Andrews wrote: > > Suddenly my message filters stopped working. I've been using > > "X-BeenThere:" in the message headers to filter list emails. Do I > > need to