Public bug reported:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories
Support for mixed data/metadata is only in the integration branch and
not the 2 year old stable branch.
$ git clone http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
$ cd btrfs-progs-unstable
$ git
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu oneiric (development branch)
11.10 (updated about 20 min ago via hardline (which thankfully auto-configures
for me))
network-manager 0.8.9997+git.20110721t045648.36db194...
network-manager-gnome 0.8.9997+git.20110726t113022.cc3d423
nm-applet blongs to
I tried getting more data after getting home. Killing network manager's
applet and then reloading it from a console to capture the error stream.
(nm-applet:13297): libnotify-WARNING **: Failed to connect to proxy
** (nm-applet:13297): DEBUG: old state indicates that this was not a disconnect 0
Me too in 11.10; apport also didn't want to authenticate me and I had to
manually sudo to run it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810335
Title:
NetworkManager crashed with SIGABRT in
Public bug reported:
My Eee901 has a 4 Billion Byte SSD and an 8 Billion Byte ssd. Selecting
btrfs however results in out of space errors even before the initial
stage of the install is complete due to exhaustion of nodes with the
default FS values designed for larger devices.
** Affects:
Do I need to file a regression against 1.98-1ubuntu9 for Lucid 10.04
LTS? These precise symptoms are occurring again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580408
Title:
Option 'No' at
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526912
Title:
nouveau framebuffer crashed : [TTM] DRM memory manager type 2 is not
I downloaded and installed grub-pc_1.99~20101126-1ubuntu3_amd64.deb
03-Dec-2010 06:05 872K (along with grub-common same version) and
the problem is fixed in that version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
You no longer have to do this site-wide:
sudo editor /etc/apache2/conf.d/egroupware
php_admin_value request_order GPCS
Why isn't this set by default?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Better fix:
sudo editor /etc/apache2/conf.d/egroupware
Change this line to add /usr/share/doc (permissive; or have the packages
it's split across added)
php_admin_value open_basedir
/usr/share/egroupware:/var/lib/egroupware:/tmp:/usr/share/php:/usr/share/doc
NOTE: You should also add
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: egroupware
I know it's already in these two bugs, but waiting for upstream changes
is not necessary since two very simple workarounds that could be back-
ported to many older versions exist.
From bugs:
This is fairly easy to repeat.
Suspend laptop.
(My battery happened to reach 100% recharge during suspend; relation
undetermined)
Resume laptop.
[13429.220048] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
[13441.203970] Corrupted low memory at 88001580 (1580 phys) =
1a8635f004700
[13441.203980]
Public bug reported:
Apport is reporting horridly generic descriptions for this bug;
absolutely useless. I'm going to create a bug with metabug in the
subject and see if I can consolidate things that fit this pattern
against a single bug.
WARNING: at
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545640/AlsaDevices.txt
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545641/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
Does this happen at 'cold' boot, or only when resuming from a suspend or
hibernation? If the later is the case, please mark as duplicate of bug
543672. (unless another reply says otherwise)
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543672 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543672
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543672
metabug lucid check_for_bios_corruption on suspend/resume
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543672 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543672
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543672
metabug lucid check_for_bios_corruption on suspend/resume
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
This might be related to bug 543672. Does it happen _every_ time you
boot, or just when you're coming out of suspend or hibernation?
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xcb/0xe0()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533181
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543672 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543672
I disagree that this is a duplicate of bug 418417; I think they could be
fixed by the same solution, but one is for Karmic and the other Lucid.
So instead I'll collect it in to bug 543672.
** This bug has
Are you getting this error only after the computer was put to sleep (in
to a suspend or hibernation state)? If yes, please mark as duplicate of
bug 543672.
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xe5/0x100()
Are you getting this error only after the computer was put to sleep (in
to a suspend or hibernation state)? If yes, please mark as duplicate of
bug 543672.
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xcb/0xe0()
I'm a bit perplexed by this:
Corrupted low memory at 88001580 (1580 phys) = 1a8635f004700
Corrupted low memory at 88001588 (1588 phys) = f700
Corrupted low memory at 88001590 (1590 phys) = 1bfff9442e5b
Corrupted low memory at 88001598 (1598 phys) =
I think this bug effects me too; and is matched to the sometimes
detected kernel-error. However I only discovered it when I realized I
was selecting Sleep and wondered where Suspend and Hibernate options
were tossed; leading to a google search.
--
sleep,hibernation fail
Maybe it's like bug 418417 but from another angle?
--
sleep,hibernation fail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535553
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I too am experiencing issues with multiple luks partitions. Under a
single LVM I have three crypt-volumes. One for /, /home, and swap. All
require passwords.
I have read the man page for crypttab and my entries are NOT using
noearly; therefore all three partitions should be prompted for and
This, BTW, was at one point working in Karmic, but recently broke (I
don't remember exactly what updates that occurred with) and also showed
up when I re-installed with just Lucid since it had otherwise become
stable enough for near normal use (and more in depth testing).
--
System frezes after
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon
This seems to be a meta-glitch relating to an update that I applied last
night.
Logging in after booting this morning showed the custom background
image, but none of the (autohide) taskbars appeared nor did alt+f2 work.
Switching
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41454575/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: InitctlList.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41454576/InitctlList.txt
** Attachment added: ProcAttrCurrent.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41454577/ProcAttrCurrent.gz
Agreed, this effects me as well in a similar way.
Still present in current 10.04 kernel: 2.6.32-16-generic
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xe5/0x100()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418417
You received this bug notification
Almost inexplicably after leaving the laptop turned off over-night and
turning it back on (without first booting any other install on it) the
system loaded without further issue. I have no idea if it is a race
condition or some other cause.
I'll keep updating and testing as normal. If I am
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
black-screen framebuffer console: [lbm-drm] nouveau :02:00.0: No ctxprog
for NV86
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525207
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
The 20100224 daily alternate installs and boots successfully to X.
Install SSH server before rebooting.
After applying the latest updates to the system/X upon reboot the
laptop's screen is back-light off and the system non-navigable.
ps axf
PID TTY STAT TIME
** Attachment added: dmesg of event
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39698456/dmesg
--
nouveau framebuffer crashed : [TTM] DRM memory manager type 2 is not clean.
kernel BUG at
/build/buildd/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32-2.6.32/debian/build/build-generic/nouveau/ttm/ttm_bo.c:1475!
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39698486/Xorg.0.log
--
nouveau framebuffer crashed : [TTM] DRM memory manager type 2 is not clean.
kernel BUG at
/build/buildd/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32-2.6.32/debian/build/build-generic/nouveau/ttm/ttm_bo.c:1475!
I noticed this regression after re-installing 9.10 and performing normal
system updates. I was backing out of a full Lucid install to dual 9.10
/ lucid installs.
I can enter the passwords for / and swap correctly within the initrd.
Then fsck is run on /boot (/dev/sda3) and / (lvm).
Next a
Still doesn't work with 20100224.
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Daily build 20100222 fixes my framebuffer issues and this bug no longer
effects me. However depending on a framebuffer as a core system
component somehow seems like the wrong route to take.
--
[lucid] Plymouth hangs at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518034
You received this bug
It seems that the fix for this made it in to the Daily alternate CD for
20100222. I've installed it and the system allows me to unlock the
single test partition I now have setup on my dual-ubuntu-boot laptop
before flickering briefly and entering X.
However I am then unable to access any other
A different bug was my root cause. Though the bugs both involve lack of
working framebuffer leading to an unusable, non-trivial to test/repair,
system.
--
Intel 915GM/GMS/910GML: blank screen after booting 2.6.32
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515246
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Install as normal on a system that will default to nouveau framebuffer.
X loads
Switch to a virtual console (ctrl+alt+f1)
Observed behavior: Static image of last X information.
Expected behavior: Video-reset to standard bios console (old behavior) OR to
framebuffer console
** Attachment added: Dmesg booting an install from daily alternate 20100222
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39521936/dmesg
--
daily 20100222 (+?) nouveau framebuffer works for X, unable to switch back to
normal virtual consoles
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525664
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
My symptoms are an utter inability to have a working framebuffer console
which creates a cascade of failure ending with what I learned was called
plymouth freezing with a solid white bar of characters when I
blacklisted all framebuffer/nvidia/nouveau related modules in chroot
** Attachment added: One attempt that I noticed had interesting messages
after...
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39469384/ubuntu-forced-flashdrive-boot.txt
--
black-screen framebuffer console: [lbm-drm] nouveau :02:00.0: No ctxprog
for NV86
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525207
You
Public bug reported:
Feb 20 08:55:58 in-target: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
that you have
Feb 20 08:55:58 in-target: requested an impossible situation or if you are
using the unstable
Feb 20 08:55:58 in-target: distribution that some required packages have not
yet been
** Attachment added: syslog
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442430/partman
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524811
You received
** Attachment added: Sorry, THIS is syslog
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442435/syslog
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
** Attachment added: hardware
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442441/hardware-summary
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524811
** Attachment added: media info: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64
(20100220)
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442449/media-info
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
Confirmed also fails in a VM as well as when using a net-install from a
USB drive.
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524811
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub-installer
Feb 20 23:10:47 grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '/dev/sda'
Feb 20 23:10:47 grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install
--no-floppy --force /dev/sda
Feb 20 23:10:49 grub-installer: /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
** Attachment added: hardware
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39459532/hardware-summary
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this
** Attachment added: partman
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39459548/partman
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this bug
** Attachment added: syslog
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39459554/syslog
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this bug
Confirmed fixed when using net-install to download. Now I'm running in
to other bugs... Thank you for the quick resolution.
It seems like this is something an automated test should catch and hold
production of the daily images over.
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220
I think I might have the same issue on an Nvidia 8xxx based laptop;
unfortunately I can't see anything past boot and am not sure if
netconsole is built in to the kernel (which is how I debug things on
kernels I compile for other distros).
--
Intel 915GM/GMS/910GML: blank screen after booting
The problem with a normal table is you get a result like this:
# | Really Long Description | Another big description | A third description
|
User 1 |
User 2 |
User 3 |
I won't bother adding the spaces since the display will strip them out,
but I think you can figure out how that grid wastes
If that is the case then the root user should be added to the admin
group by default.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
System administration task dialgues do not allow the account 'root' to
authenticate even with a password
Sorry, I was trying to clarify potential use cases, both for passwords
with and passwords without sys-admin capabilities. Editing accounts is
probably some other bug... all the usability issues that I see as
related actually collections of different bugs. Each bug a small piece
of grit fouling
Also, I just noticed when going to file the other wishlist bug... Why
was my bug linked to GDM as a duplicate? I specifically chose the
proper package and hadn't looked; this isn't related to mine at all!
--
Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
This is a wishlist priority item, please change that as I don't have
that kind of access.
I think it would be much easier to understand and control current
account privileges if there were a tabular format.
Across the top slanted (
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
While I agree that the correct policy would be to (after a clear
warning) allow password-less accounts...
'Documentation' in this case should be a CLEAR error message triggered
by this combination of events:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
Tested on 9.10 beta and 9.04 as well.
Steps to reproduce:
#Set a root password.
sudo passwd
# Verify you can login at a local console.
(ctrl+alt+f1) login...
Logout/switch back to your X session.
Attempt to launch a graphical
My use case is different. My parents are near retirement and just want
a super-easy-to-use computer; that means security via physical access
only. Accounts are merely a preference filing system to them.
Password-less accounts in the admin group are a questionable thing; but
if that's what the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
The user logged in at the time was NOT root. As I described, I had
created a root password (I like su better than sudo -s, and local root
login is nicer for servicing a system than the potential alternative
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
I should clarify, this is an issue I encountered trying to unlock the
privileged mode of system administration tasks. As an example,
adding/modifying users/groups with the tool found in the system menu.
It
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
Having this behavior isn't in it's self a bug. Not /documenting/ the
behavior properly in dialogs related to system administration tools /is/
a bug. Additionally when root ==HAS A PASSWORD== it is a valid
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33849674/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33849675/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33849676/ProcStatus.txt
--
Unable to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
Unable to authenticate as user 'root' (I have added a password) OR as
current user (account has no password due to end user preference).
The end users in question want one click logins and to not remember
passwords. They might be
If you upgrade the version of webkit on the CD, or download today's
daily-live CD (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/), does the bug
still happen?
Thank you, I didn't know about -that- set of daily builds and the
2009-10-16 build has proceeded past the section where the 9.10-Beta-x86
CD
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: migration-assistant
This is the actual real-world use case:
While trying to pitch Linux (Mint) to older users (50/60s) as a
replacement for an aging WinXP installation migration-assistant fails to
copy and create the selected accounts from the Windows
** Attachment added: Install Log from ubuntu 9.10 beta
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33804152/install-logs.tar.gz
--
Copies all accounts in to the single-initial account instead of copying
accounts to -new- accounts of the same name.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453570
You received this
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: migration-assistant
Migration-assistant should allow the following:
0) Operation Before, During, and After install.
1) Create new accounts
2) As mentioned in some ubuntu task documents, allow for backup/archiving
accounts to other media in the case of a
Please set importance to Wishlist (I don't seem to be able to make that
change)
--
Migration Assistant should be usable outside the installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453586
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: partman.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770448/partman.gz
** Attachment added: Casper.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770449/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770450/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added:
** Attachment added: syslog.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770524/syslog.gz
--
Ubiquity fails after the summary, dies while trying to show the partition editor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Ubuntu 9.10 Beta cd, ubituity as included and updated via apt-get update
; apt-get install ubiquity (to 2.0.0)
apt-cache policy ubiquity
ubiquity:
Installed: 2.0.0
Candidate: 2.0.0
Version table:
*** 2.0.0 0
500
It would be very nice to attach multiple attachments in one post... or
more than one with the first.
** Attachment added: ubiquity-debug.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770607/ubiquity-debug.gz
--
Ubiquity fails after the summary, dies while trying to show the partition editor
I confirm that this patch works for me, though it does ask me to decrypt
my root partition prior to resuming from swap (which is an un-necessary
entry of a password, unless it's checking the disk for resume
entries/info first; though it mounts / after it checks resume so I doubt
that is the case).
-Fully- updated xubuntu jaunty (9.04) install (amd64, 2gb ram, Turion64
(AMD dual core)).
KGpg
Version 2.1.0
Using KDE 4.2.2 (KDE 4.2.2)
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
While refreshing a selection of keys from the keyserver (after it
updates the keyring successfully)
Application: KGpg (kgpg), signal
The upstream bug is unconfirmed, while I can confirm that it does affect
me as well. Unfortunately it looks, from a glance, that upstream needs
a debug symbols version of kgpg run to collect additional information,
but ubuntu provides only stripped binaries.
Are there packages containing split
Public bug reported:
xmlto or docbook or docbook-dsssl or docbook-xml or docbook-xsl fails
with xsl:import : unable to load
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl
dpkg -l *docbook*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
The Updates appear to work on my laptop
Disk
|-Swap
|-Boot
|-LVM
|-lv-Crypto-Root
|-lv-Crypto-Home
|-lv-Crypto-Other
--
udev repeatedly generates change events for the same block device(s)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I just got a crash that matched this bug description exactly. If it's
reproducible I'll open another bug.
--
konsole crashed with SIGSEGV in KWindowSystem::compositingActive()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278588
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs,
This is a major problem.
Ctrl+Alt+Backspace is a STANDARD DEFAULT key sequence.
This is deliberately breaking a feature that long time users, support
staff, and others expect to be there and work.
Deviating from established conventions such as this should require at
least two things.
1) A way
If watch is the problem, what is it supposed to be doing anyway?
--
udev repeatedly generates change events for the same block device(s)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Setting importance is a problem; only a restricted set of users may set
it.
I believe this bug may be effecting me as well. It seems to thrash the
system for around 5 min, and then I'm left with a bazillion sleeping
processes.
4635 root 20 0 845m 474m 39m R8 23.9 0:41.44 Xorg
It would be nice if there were a status that reflected the general sentiment
of...
'Stale, possibly fixed with other updates'
** Changed in: xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
xfdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_foreach()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328377
You
TJ if that's the case then this is probably a flaw of the entire block
IO system design.
In my mind, the ideal solution would be to have an abstraction which
eventually reduces to a list of raw devices and block-ranges of action
per device. When a watch or event occurs it would only be within
Yeah, Fishor if TJ is correct then what's happening is this.
Udev adds watches on any of these devices which you have...
disk/partition
lvm
crypto
raid
(any other device-mapper things)
Only, unfortunately, two or more of those are the same real device. A
race condition (which would probably be
Another workaround -might- be possible within grub then.
During menu-selection hit e to edit
arrow over the kernel line
e to edit the line
add (after a space) to the end 'maxcpus=1' and it might boot.
I'll see if I can test that.
--
udev repeatedly generates change events for the same block
Unfortunately that does not seem to work on my test setup.
--
udev repeatedly generates change events for the same block device(s)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Scott, you have a strongly supported hypothesis, a problem domain of LVM
and -any- of the other watch rulesets.
Looking over every comment in this bug and everyone that mentions system
setup also seems to be running LVM in one way or another.
The topic in #ubuntu+1 should be updated to help
Interesting, I followed a different guide when setting up my
lvm+cryptsetup system and I have not had an issue with initrds not
containing cryptsetup, -except- once when I used -u instead of -c to run
update-initramfs.
http://www.debuntu.org/how-to-encrypted-partitions-over-lvm-with-luks-
My setup:
Dual core X2, 2gb ram, sata hard disk (sdaX), etc.
A windows vista partition (came with laptop -rarely- used... 'when I have to')
A normal boot partition
An LVM partition
crypttab
rootvolume /dev/ubuntu/encryptedroot none luks,retry=1
homevolume /dev/ubuntu/encryptedhome none
jh, can you get in or chroot and run:
sudo dpkg -l udev
You should see this:
ii udev 138-2~tj~ppa2j
rule-based device node and kernel event manager
If you do, please run this: (I use -c since -u has broken the cryptsetup
Interesting, I don't remember if I tried commenting it out with the
first spin of the PPA package or the 138-1 version of the package.
Does installing the PPA version of the package fix it?
--
[jaunty] doesn't boot anymore after udev upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received
If you've -only- commented it out like in my prior post:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/332270/comments/16
You -ALSO- need to update the initrd. The stale initrd will still have the bad
rulesets in it.
sudo update-initramfs -c -k all
gunzip -dc
Downgraded to 138-1
Copied auto-gen initrd to a temporary one and setup a grub line to boot
that.
Edited /lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules to remove the
'watch' lines.
regenerated initrds (which then become the defaults).
Results:
ppa-2 == Boots (already inside it before I started
Is anyone that does -not- use LVM or RAID or other device-mapper items
effected?
(I believe the effect for this is that the device-mapper devices have
different names/patterns that are user selectable, and that other
devices are black-listed from the watch some other way, instead of
white-listing
Here are some probable blacklist lines.
# skip rules for inappropriate block devices
KERNEL==ram*|fd*|nbd*|gnbd*|dm-*|md*|btibm*, GOTO=persistent_storage_end
# never access non-cdrom removable ide devices, the drivers are causing event
loops on open()
KERNEL==hd*[!0-9], ATTR{removable}==1,
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
